Re: [ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt master (ovirt-engine) ] [ 18-10-2018 ] [ 002_bootstrap.add_hosts ]

I am starting to see master jobs passing so it seems the issue is resolved https://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/Change%20queue%20jobs/job/ovirt-master_cha... On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 5:54 PM Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > I'm back at the office tomorrow, let me know if anything else else is > needed. > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, 17:34 Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> openvswitch2.10 was tagged and Gal just merged: >> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ >> >> I re-triggered latest changes from failed projects and will update once >> I see results. >> >> thanks, >> Dafna >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 PM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> sandro was away for a few days. maybe eyal or Rafael Martins can help >>> with the tagging issue >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM Galit Rosenthal <grosenth(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Any updates, still failing? >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:49 PM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> adding sandron >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < >>>>> mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>> > my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using >>>>>> openvswitch2.9 and >>>>>> > not 2.10 >>>>>> > is that package bump merged? >>>>>> >>>>>> No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged. >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >>>>>> > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >> > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the >>>>>> issue in >>>>>> >> > upgrade >>>>>> >> > I do see that >>>>>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ >>>>>> >> > has >>>>>> >> > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and >>>>>> dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so >>>>>> >> > hope >>>>>> >> > it would grab the correct one. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that >>>>>> works. >>>>>> >> That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push >>>>>> the >>>>>> >> latest one available. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Fingers crossed. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >>>>>> >> > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >> >> > Hi, >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite. >>>>>> >> >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk >>>>>> deps. >>>>>> >> >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there >>>>>> are some >>>>>> >> >> > issues >>>>>> >> >> > with dependencies. >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can >>>>>> you >>>>>> >> >> > please >>>>>> >> >> > update on the issue? >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > full log is here; >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/arti... >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: >>>>>> >> >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > Thanks, >>>>>> >> >> > Dafna >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> Hi all, >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk >>>>>> libraries, >>>>>> >> >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the >>>>>> current >>>>>> >> >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us >>>>>> dpdk >>>>>> >> >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not >>>>>> openvswitch 2.9 >>>>>> >> >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled >>>>>> in the >>>>>> >> >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch >>>>>> because >>>>>> >> >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not >>>>>> the >>>>>> >> >> *extras*. >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using >>>>>> ovs-2.10 with >>>>>> >> >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using >>>>>> ovs-2.10 >>>>>> >> >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host >>>>>> yum.log - at >>>>>> >> >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what >>>>>> we want to >>>>>> >> >> deliver: >>>>>> >> >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig >>>>>> >> >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from >>>>>> centos >>>>>> >> >> extra packages >>>>>> >>>>>> @Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump >>>>>> the ovs version >>>>>> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 >>>>>> >> >> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ >>>>>> >> >> [2] - >>>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ >>>>>> >> >> [3] - >>>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ >>>>>> >> >> [4] - >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/exp... >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> GALIT ROSENTHAL >>>> >>>> SOFTWARE ENGINEER >>>> >>>> Red Hat >>>> >>>> <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>> >>>> galit(a)gmail.com T: 972-9-7692230 >>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>> >>>