On 08/09/2016 03:55 PM, Archana Singh wrote:
Hi Suresh,
1) I guess for virtual network do you mean type as "network" instead
"direct"?
virtual network(type=direct)
My bad,,yes its type="network" for virtual network
2) Just to be clear the network xml example given by you are not for
libvirt network xml instead interface xml used in domain xml.
correct
3) Just to addon example of interface xml for virtual
network(type=network) (current implementation).
<interface type='network' name='ethX'>
<start mode='onboot'/>
<source network='default'/>
<model type='virtio'/>
</interface>
thank you
Thanks,
Archana Singh
On 08/09/2016 02:42 PM, Suresh Babu Angadi wrote:
> Hi All,
> To support, attaching a physical interface to guest as macvtap or
> attaching ovs bridge to guest without creating libvirt network, I
> propose following changes to 'networks' attribute of templates josn.
>
> current implementation:
> 'networks' attribute expects list of virtual network names
>
> changes:
> 'networks': list of dictionary
> type: can be direct, network or bridge
> interface: name of physical interface(type=direct) or
> ovs (type=bridge) or virtual network(type=direc
correction - virtual
network(type=network)
> mode(required if type=direct): bridge or vepa
>
> for macvtap: type is direct and mode can be bridge or vepa
> for ovs: type is bridge and mode is not required
> for virtual network: type=network(current implementation)
>
> Examples of network xml for attaching macvtap and ovs to guest
> without libvirt:
> OVS:
> <interface type="bridge">
> <source bridge="vswitch0"/>
> <virtualport type="openvswitch"/>
> <model type="virtio"/>
> </interface>
>
> macvtap with bridge mode:
> <interface type="direct">
> <source dev="eth0" mode="bridge"/>
> <model type="virtio"/>
> </interface>
>
> macvtap with vepa mode:
> <interface type="direct">
> <source dev="bond0" mode="vepa"/>
> <model type="virtio"/>
> </interface>
>
--
Regards,
Suresh Babu Angadi