[RFC] integrety: storage pool deactivate/undefine needs to consider vm usage #355

24 Aug
2016
24 Aug
'16
7:42 p.m.
Propose: do not deactive or undefine storage pool with vms being used. Avoid undefine storage pool was already discussed. Talking about deactive, we've got some questions: 1) Since the storage volume is available, the vm can run with storage poll on or off. So, we are going only to avoid deactive pools that can make storage volume unavailable, like nfs? 2) Or we are going to extend this rule to all storage pools? -- Ramon Nunes Medeiros Kimchi Developer Linux Technology Center Brazil IBM Systems & Technology Group Phone : +55 19 2132 7878 ramonn@br.ibm.com
3271
Age (days ago)
3271
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Ramon Medeiros