[RFC] integrety: storage pool deactivate/undefine needs to consider vm usage #355
 
            
            
            
            
                24 Aug
                
                    2016
                
            
            
                24 Aug
                
                '16
                
            
            
            
        
    
                6:42 p.m.
            
        Propose: do not deactive or undefine storage pool with vms being used. Avoid undefine storage pool was already discussed. Talking about deactive, we've got some questions: 1) Since the storage volume is available, the vm can run with storage poll on or off. So, we are going only to avoid deactive pools that can make storage volume unavailable, like nfs? 2) Or we are going to extend this rule to all storage pools? -- Ramon Nunes Medeiros Kimchi Developer Linux Technology Center Brazil IBM Systems & Technology Group Phone : +55 19 2132 7878 ramonn@br.ibm.com
        3355
        
      
          Age (days ago)
        
      
        3355
        
    
          Last active (days ago)
        
        
        
        0 comments
    
    
        
        1 participants
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    participants (1)
- 
                 Ramon Medeiros Ramon Medeiros