3:39 a.m.
Hi folks,
I would like to propose splitting cli/sdk projects as each of them should become a
master-project for different implementations
and i guess we wouldn't want mixing different SDKs and CLIs under same project.
--
Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
11:44 a.m.
On 09/29/2011 04:39 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to propose splitting cli/sdk projects as each of them should become a
master-project for different implementations
and i guess we wouldn't want mixing different SDKs and CLIs under same project.
When Itamar and I worked the initial project list we kept them together
so that there would be more momentum around both. What I suggest is that
as we get going and the maintainer count increases around each we look
at splitting them.
What we can do is manage then as two GIT trees in anticipation of this.
Carl.
3:40 p.m.
On Thursday 29 September 2011 11:39:29 Michael Pasternak wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to propose splitting cli/sdk projects as each of them should become a
master-project for different implementations
and i guess we wouldn't want mixing different SDKs and CLIs under same project.
+1.
Makes a lot of sense, as long as this kicks off in sync' with
the downstream sdk/cli. That is, make sure we're able to port
patches from upstream to downstream with as little changes as possible.
--
/d
"Ford," he said, "you're turning into a penguin. Stop it."
--Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
4597
days inactive
4599
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Carl Trieloff -
Doron Fediuck -
Michael Pasternak