On 06/17/2012 06:20 PM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
Got more questions on this, now that I am re-visiting this.
The last time i tried using SHAREDFS, i started from
createStorageDomain verb, and it works fine.
But now we have connectStorageServer verb... which i believe is the
new way of doing things ?
If i start from connectStorageServer verb to mount using SHAREDFS (
which goes via PosixFs... MountConnection flow), that won't help me
entirely here, right ?
Because it only mounts based on the dict sent, but does not do
anything with the image and metadata stuff ( which createStorageDomain
flow did ).
I am wondering if its too early to start using connectStorageServer ?
If not, how can i re-write the above vdsm standalone example using
connectStorageServer instead of createStorageDomain flow ?
'Guess i got confused.. the standalone example does use
connectStorageServer followed by createStorageDomain.
Scratch the question .. my bad..