Re: [ovirt-users] Some tests results: lustrefs over nfs on VM
On Nov 19, 2017 11:05 PM, "Arman Khalatyan" <arm2arm(a)gmail.com> wrote:
hi Yaniv,
yes for sure I hit some cache in between but not the vm cache, it has a 4GB
ram, with oflag=direct I get about 120MB/s
for the data analysis the cache is our friend:)
The backend is a lustrefs 2.10.x.
yes we have dedicated 10G on the hosts, where we can limit the vm interface
to 10Gbit?
Define QoS on the NIC.
But I think you wish to limit IO, no?
Y.
Am 19.11.2017 8:33 nachm. schrieb "Yaniv Kaul" <ykaul(a)redhat.com>:
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Arman Khalatyan <arm2arm(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, in our environment we got pretty good io performance on VM, with
following configuration:
lustrebox: /lust mounted on "GATEWAY" over IB
GATEWAY: export /lust as nfs4 on 10G interface
VM(test.vm): import as NFS over 10G interface
[root(a)test.vm <root(a)gans.vm> ~]# dd if=/dev/zero bs=128K count=100000
Without oflag=direct, you are hitting (somewhat) the cache.
of=/test/tmp/test.tmp
100000+0 records in
100000+0 records out
13107200000 <(310)%20720-0000> bytes (13 GB) copied, 20.8402 s, 629 MB/s
looks promising for the future deployments.
Very - what's the backend storage?
only one problem remains that on heavy io I get some wornings that the vm
network is saturated, are there way to configure the bandwidth limits to
10G for the VM Interface??
Yes, but you really need a dedicated storage interface, no?
Y.
thank you beforehand,
Arman.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 5.6 KB)