[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.4.0 Beta release refresh is now available for testing

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't Ovirt an HA cluster? I assume pacemaker would be for specific apps like httpd or database, correct? Gluster is more of a distributed file system. I'm just wondering with the performance complaints with gluster if there wouldn't be a better solution. Just thinking out loud. Eric Evans Digital Data Services LLC. 304.660.9080 -----Original Message----- From: Uwe Laverenz <uwe(a)laverenz.de&gt; Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 1:57 PM To: users(a)ovirt.org Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.4.0 Beta release refresh is now available for testing Hi Eric, Am 13.04.20 um 18:15 schrieb eevans(a)digitaldatatechs.com: if I'm not mistaken, these two have different purposes: gluster(fs) is a distributed storage software and pacemaker is for resource management of HA cluster systems. regards, Uwe _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/33JKX6SNGJZ...