On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:49:59AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il 29/11/2013 09:43, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>>>> Meeting summary
>>>> * Agenda and roll Call (doron, 15:02:42)
>>>> * 3.3 update releases (doron, 15:04:23)
>>>> * 3.4 planning (doron, 15:04:24)
>>>> * conferences and workshops (doron, 15:04:26)
>>>> * infra update (doron, 15:04:27)
>>>> * other topics (doron, 15:04:29)
>>>> * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/admin/projects/ovirt-release
>>>> (danken, 15:12:58)
>>>> * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/21794
>>>> * LINK: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-release/16800/
>>>> * mburns to add sbonazzo as a maintainer to support ovirt-release
>>>> project (doron, 15:18:17)
>>> ovirt-release-9 released yesterday
>> BTW: I see that this package contains
>> (and ovirt-release-fedora-8-1.noarch already did so)
>> By default all lines are disabled in it.
>> When and how this repo should be enabled? Only when using nightly or
>> only under developers/maintainers indications?
> I think that fedora-virt-preview should be used with nightly, stable shouldn't
> However, since fedora-virt-preview contains vdsm - related packages not needed if you
run only ovirt-engine (without using the same host as
> hypervisor) I think it's better to wait for VDSM guys answer.
Vdsm is not in
virt-preview is not needed for ovirt-3.3, and frankly, I think it should
be dropped from ovirt-release.
It used to be needed on the nodes when vdsm required a version of
libvirt that was not yet in Fedora. Now that we have el6 as a
fully-supported platform, and given that el6 is missing from
virt-preview, virt-preview is much less helpful to us.
So, any objection in removing virt-preview from ovirt-release?
What about nightly? Will it be needed there?
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at