Re: [ovirt-users] Can´t use a VM Network VLAN, because the Virtual Machines inside can't reach the Gateway
I tried a different Aproach: One VLAN for each NIC I tried but not works.... I left the Virtual Machine pinging the Gateway after 10 minutes I left my Worstation alone and I went back to my home. Today i see the ping working (¿?) Maybe I rush too much...or maybe not. I reboot the Virtual Machine, same problem: after 15 minutes the Machine can't reach the Gateway, we need HA and 10+ minutes it's not considerated. After a I mess my oVirt LAB, after trying everything. This my last working setup with sloooooooooow reaching of Gateway: DATA CENTERS Logical Networks: ----------- Name: ovirtmgmt Description: Management Network Network Label: 1 MTU: Default ----------- Name: dmz Description: VLAN 50 Network Label: 50 Enable VLAN tagging: 50 VM network MTU: Default ----------- Name: Hosting Description: VLAN 100 Network Label: 100 Enable VLAN tagging: 100 VM network MTU: Default ------------ CLUSTERS Logical Networks ovirtmgmt Assign Required Display Network Migration Network dmz Assign Hosting Assign Required HOSTS Name: srvovirt02.cnsc.net Hostname/IP: 192.168.0.63 Network Interfaces HOSTS BOND VLAN NETWORK NAME ADDRESS MAC SPEED(Mbps) RX(Mbps) TX(Mbps) eno1 * ovirtmgmt 192.168.0.63 00:17:a4:77:00:18 10000 < 1 < 1 eno2 eno2.50 (50) dmz 192.168.50.8 00:17:a4:77:00:1a 10000 < 1 < 1 ens1f0 ens1f0.100 (100) Hosting 192.168.100.7 00:17:a4:77:00:1c 10000 < 1 < 1 ens1f1 00:17:a4:77:00:1e 0 < 1 < 1 Setup Hosts Networks Network: ovirtmgmt Static IP: 192.168.0.63 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0 Gateway: 192.168.0.1 Custom Properties: No available keys Sync network: Yes Network: dmz Static IP: 192.168.50.8 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.224 Gateway: 192.168.50.1 Custom Properties: Please select a key... Network: Hosting Static IP: 192.168.100.7 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.240 Gateway: 192.168.100.1 Custom Properties: Please select a key... Virtual Machines Name: PruebaVLAN Host: srvovirt02.cnsc.net Edit Network Interface Name: nic1 Profile: dmz/dmz Type: VirtIO Custom MAC address: 00:00:1a:4a:3e:00 Link State: Up Card Status: Plugged Network Interfaces in the Host srvovirt02.cnsc.net: 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master ovirtmgmt state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 4: ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 5: ens1f1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 6: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN link/ether 72:f8:9c:75:e3:86 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 7: ;vdsmdummy;: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 10: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master dmz state UNKNOWN qlen 500 link/ether fe:00:1a:4a:3e:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fc00:1aff:fe4a:3e00/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 17: eno2.50@eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master dmz state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 18: dmz: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.50.8/27 brd 192.168.50.31 scope global dmz valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 19: ens1f0.100@ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master Hosting state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 20: Hosting: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.100.7/28 brd 192.168.100.15 scope global Hosting valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 21: ovirtmgmt: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.0.63/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global ovirtmgmt valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2015-06-30 21:34 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14@gmail.com>:
You can count on it :)
2015-06-30 21:23 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:
Let us know how it works out, I am curious to see if having a untagged and tagged interface on the same bridge was an issue. On Jun 30, 2015 10:21 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Donny, Tomorrow I'm going to try this. :)
2015-06-30 21:12 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:
That tells me that there is a tagging issue between the host and the switch. Untagged traffic flows without issue via the same interface as tagged traffic. As a personal best practice I separate access ports(untagged) and trunk ports (tagged) traffic on different physical ports. Can you setup a separate phys interface for the tagged traffic, or must you be able to pass both on the same interface. On Jun 30, 2015 10:05 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
My mgmt network works wonderfully, Virtual Machines created on the mgmt even can reach Internet. But my company wants the traffic separated.
Thanks Donny, I'm a RHCSA from Colombia, but I'm learning about oVirt. (oVirt is a new thing in my country)
P.S : I want to put VMware in the Trash Can too. ^_ ^
2015-06-30 20:59 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:
There is a special place in my DC for vmware. TrashCan...lol On Jun 30, 2015 9:50 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm going to check it out... but how the host can reach the Gateway > and the Virtual Machine inside doesn't ? > > Donny you are very kind, this the last step to free my DataCenter > from VMware. > > 2015-06-30 20:46 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: > >> Does your switch have an IP on that vlan... I would step things out >> VM>host>switch>rtr >> >> You have already confirmed VM to host. >> >> I'm going to look at your screens again to make sure I didn't miss >> anything >> On Jun 30, 2015 9:42 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the explanation :) >>> >>> I set everything of the VLANs at oVirt, After I put a IP on the >>> Virtual Machine. But the Virtual Machine can't reach the gateway, The host >>> can do. The Virtual Machine only can reach the host. All the machines of >>> the range of net can reach the Virtual Machine. >>> >>> 2015-06-30 20:36 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>> >>>> I'm asking if your setting the vlan on the VM or at ovirt. >>>> >>>> More than likely if you are coming from VMware you have the Vlans >>>> set at the hypervisor. This does work in ovirt, I am doing it right now >>>> On Jun 30, 2015 9:31 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mmmm I'm new in oVirt :( >>>>> >>>>> VMs Interface is Virtual MachineS Interface or VM Network >>>>> Interface in the host ? >>>>> >>>>> I configured the IP of the VLAN in the host. >>>>> >>>>> I double check: the NIC of the Host has the VLAN assigned. >>>>> >>>>> Can you help me ? >>>>> >>>>> 2015-06-30 20:11 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>>>> >>>>>> Are you configuring the vms interface with the vlan or tagging >>>>>> at the host. >>>>>> On Jun 30, 2015 7:28 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Donny >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We have HP Switches (HP 5406zl) and they are configurated on >>>>>>> trunk mode. (VMware is configurated to use that). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any suggestion ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for your response. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2015-06-30 17:51 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Vlans are layer 2, sounds like a tagging problem. Cisco >>>>>>>> switches? The tag sticks to the host bridge, but is being stripped off when >>>>>>>> it leaves the host.... Is your switch in access mode or trunk? >>>>>>>> Hi Friends of oVirt >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm trying to migrate my company from VMware to oVirt. >>>>>>>> In my final tests, I set up 2 more VLANs in oVirt, (VM VLANs) >>>>>>>> The Virtual Machines in these VLANs, can be reached from the >>>>>>>> external IPs from the net range, >>>>>>>> but from the Virtual machines only can ping the Host with the >>>>>>>> Bridge and itself, can't reach the gateway. ¿? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I configured a IP Forwarding in the Host with the virtual >>>>>>>> machine, and nothing changes... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any idea ? This is the last duty before embrace oVirt in the >>>>>>>> company. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Look to the VLAN 100 configuration (My desired VM Network): >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/7hrog0a2n/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/68b40i1vr/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/lu6mlshgp/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/540o1qc0t/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/4kyg787bt/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/v7ralh7zb/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/kn903cl03/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For any idea, thanks in advance >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Users mailing list >>>>>>>> Users@ovirt.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >
I'm going to erase everything and the try this: http://www.ovirt.org/QA:TestCase_Hosted_Engine_Tagged_VLAN_Support 2015-07-02 10:41 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14@gmail.com>:
I tried a different Aproach:
One VLAN for each NIC
I tried but not works.... I left the Virtual Machine pinging the Gateway after 10 minutes I left my Worstation alone and I went back to my home. Today i see the ping working (¿?) Maybe I rush too much...or maybe not.
I reboot the Virtual Machine, same problem: after 15 minutes the Machine can't reach the Gateway, we need HA and 10+ minutes it's not considerated.
After a I mess my oVirt LAB, after trying everything.
This my last working setup with sloooooooooow reaching of Gateway:
DATA CENTERS
Logical Networks: ----------- Name: ovirtmgmt Description: Management Network Network Label: 1 MTU: Default ----------- Name: dmz Description: VLAN 50 Network Label: 50 Enable VLAN tagging: 50 VM network MTU: Default ----------- Name: Hosting Description: VLAN 100 Network Label: 100 Enable VLAN tagging: 100 VM network MTU: Default ------------
CLUSTERS
Logical Networks
ovirtmgmt Assign Required Display Network Migration Network dmz Assign Hosting Assign Required
HOSTS
Name: srvovirt02.cnsc.net Hostname/IP: 192.168.0.63
Network Interfaces
HOSTS BOND VLAN NETWORK NAME ADDRESS MAC SPEED(Mbps) RX(Mbps) TX(Mbps)
eno1 * ovirtmgmt 192.168.0.63 00:17:a4:77:00:18 10000 < 1 < 1
eno2 eno2.50 (50) dmz 192.168.50.8 00:17:a4:77:00:1a 10000 < 1 < 1
ens1f0 ens1f0.100 (100) Hosting 192.168.100.7 00:17:a4:77:00:1c 10000 < 1 < 1
ens1f1 00:17:a4:77:00:1e 0 < 1 < 1
Setup Hosts Networks
Network: ovirtmgmt Static IP: 192.168.0.63 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0 Gateway: 192.168.0.1 Custom Properties: No available keys Sync network: Yes
Network: dmz Static IP: 192.168.50.8 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.224 Gateway: 192.168.50.1 Custom Properties: Please select a key...
Network: Hosting Static IP: 192.168.100.7 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.240 Gateway: 192.168.100.1 Custom Properties: Please select a key...
Virtual Machines
Name: PruebaVLAN Host: srvovirt02.cnsc.net
Edit Network Interface
Name: nic1 Profile: dmz/dmz Type: VirtIO Custom MAC address: 00:00:1a:4a:3e:00 Link State: Up Card Status: Plugged
Network Interfaces in the Host srvovirt02.cnsc.net:
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master ovirtmgmt state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 4: ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 5: ens1f1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 6: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN link/ether 72:f8:9c:75:e3:86 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 7: ;vdsmdummy;: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 10: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master dmz state UNKNOWN qlen 500 link/ether fe:00:1a:4a:3e:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fc00:1aff:fe4a:3e00/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 17: eno2.50@eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master dmz state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 18: dmz: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.50.8/27 brd 192.168.50.31 scope global dmz valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 19: ens1f0.100@ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master Hosting state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 20: Hosting: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.100.7/28 brd 192.168.100.15 scope global Hosting valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 21: ovirtmgmt: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.0.63/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global ovirtmgmt valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2015-06-30 21:34 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14@gmail.com>:
You can count on it :)
2015-06-30 21:23 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:
Let us know how it works out, I am curious to see if having a untagged and tagged interface on the same bridge was an issue. On Jun 30, 2015 10:21 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Donny, Tomorrow I'm going to try this. :)
2015-06-30 21:12 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:
That tells me that there is a tagging issue between the host and the switch. Untagged traffic flows without issue via the same interface as tagged traffic. As a personal best practice I separate access ports(untagged) and trunk ports (tagged) traffic on different physical ports. Can you setup a separate phys interface for the tagged traffic, or must you be able to pass both on the same interface. On Jun 30, 2015 10:05 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
My mgmt network works wonderfully, Virtual Machines created on the mgmt even can reach Internet. But my company wants the traffic separated.
Thanks Donny, I'm a RHCSA from Colombia, but I'm learning about oVirt. (oVirt is a new thing in my country)
P.S : I want to put VMware in the Trash Can too. ^_ ^
2015-06-30 20:59 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:
> There is a special place in my DC for vmware. TrashCan...lol > On Jun 30, 2015 9:50 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I'm going to check it out... but how the host can reach the Gateway >> and the Virtual Machine inside doesn't ? >> >> Donny you are very kind, this the last step to free my DataCenter >> from VMware. >> >> 2015-06-30 20:46 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >> >>> Does your switch have an IP on that vlan... I would step things >>> out VM>host>switch>rtr >>> >>> You have already confirmed VM to host. >>> >>> I'm going to look at your screens again to make sure I didn't miss >>> anything >>> On Jun 30, 2015 9:42 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for the explanation :) >>>> >>>> I set everything of the VLANs at oVirt, After I put a IP on the >>>> Virtual Machine. But the Virtual Machine can't reach the gateway, The host >>>> can do. The Virtual Machine only can reach the host. All the machines of >>>> the range of net can reach the Virtual Machine. >>>> >>>> 2015-06-30 20:36 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>>> >>>>> I'm asking if your setting the vlan on the VM or at ovirt. >>>>> >>>>> More than likely if you are coming from VMware you have the >>>>> Vlans set at the hypervisor. This does work in ovirt, I am doing it right >>>>> now >>>>> On Jun 30, 2015 9:31 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Mmmm I'm new in oVirt :( >>>>>> >>>>>> VMs Interface is Virtual MachineS Interface or VM Network >>>>>> Interface in the host ? >>>>>> >>>>>> I configured the IP of the VLAN in the host. >>>>>> >>>>>> I double check: the NIC of the Host has the VLAN assigned. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you help me ? >>>>>> >>>>>> 2015-06-30 20:11 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you configuring the vms interface with the vlan or tagging >>>>>>> at the host. >>>>>>> On Jun 30, 2015 7:28 PM, "Julián Tete" < >>>>>>> danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Donny >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We have HP Switches (HP 5406zl) and they are configurated on >>>>>>>> trunk mode. (VMware is configurated to use that). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any suggestion ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for your response. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2015-06-30 17:51 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Vlans are layer 2, sounds like a tagging problem. Cisco >>>>>>>>> switches? The tag sticks to the host bridge, but is being stripped off when >>>>>>>>> it leaves the host.... Is your switch in access mode or trunk? >>>>>>>>> Hi Friends of oVirt >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm trying to migrate my company from VMware to oVirt. >>>>>>>>> In my final tests, I set up 2 more VLANs in oVirt, (VM >>>>>>>>> VLANs) >>>>>>>>> The Virtual Machines in these VLANs, can be reached from the >>>>>>>>> external IPs from the net range, >>>>>>>>> but from the Virtual machines only can ping the Host with >>>>>>>>> the Bridge and itself, can't reach the gateway. ¿? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I configured a IP Forwarding in the Host with the virtual >>>>>>>>> machine, and nothing changes... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Any idea ? This is the last duty before embrace oVirt in the >>>>>>>>> company. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Look to the VLAN 100 configuration (My desired VM Network): >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/7hrog0a2n/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/68b40i1vr/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/lu6mlshgp/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/540o1qc0t/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/4kyg787bt/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/v7ralh7zb/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/kn903cl03/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For any idea, thanks in advance >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Users mailing list >>>>>>>>> Users@ovirt.org >>>>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>
Don't work.... :'( I'm going to try this: *https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072027 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072027>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072027 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072027>* 2015-07-02 11:40 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14@gmail.com>:
I'm going to erase everything and the try this:
http://www.ovirt.org/QA:TestCase_Hosted_Engine_Tagged_VLAN_Support
2015-07-02 10:41 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14@gmail.com>:
I tried a different Aproach:
One VLAN for each NIC
I tried but not works.... I left the Virtual Machine pinging the Gateway after 10 minutes I left my Worstation alone and I went back to my home. Today i see the ping working (¿?) Maybe I rush too much...or maybe not.
I reboot the Virtual Machine, same problem: after 15 minutes the Machine can't reach the Gateway, we need HA and 10+ minutes it's not considerated.
After a I mess my oVirt LAB, after trying everything.
This my last working setup with sloooooooooow reaching of Gateway:
DATA CENTERS
Logical Networks: ----------- Name: ovirtmgmt Description: Management Network Network Label: 1 MTU: Default ----------- Name: dmz Description: VLAN 50 Network Label: 50 Enable VLAN tagging: 50 VM network MTU: Default ----------- Name: Hosting Description: VLAN 100 Network Label: 100 Enable VLAN tagging: 100 VM network MTU: Default ------------
CLUSTERS
Logical Networks
ovirtmgmt Assign Required Display Network Migration Network dmz Assign Hosting Assign Required
HOSTS
Name: srvovirt02.cnsc.net Hostname/IP: 192.168.0.63
Network Interfaces
HOSTS BOND VLAN NETWORK NAME ADDRESS MAC SPEED(Mbps) RX(Mbps) TX(Mbps)
eno1 * ovirtmgmt 192.168.0.63 00:17:a4:77:00:18 10000 < 1 < 1
eno2 eno2.50 (50) dmz 192.168.50.8 00:17:a4:77:00:1a 10000 < 1 < 1
ens1f0 ens1f0.100 (100) Hosting 192.168.100.7 00:17:a4:77:00:1c 10000 < 1 < 1
ens1f1 00:17:a4:77:00:1e 0 < 1 < 1
Setup Hosts Networks
Network: ovirtmgmt Static IP: 192.168.0.63 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0 Gateway: 192.168.0.1 Custom Properties: No available keys Sync network: Yes
Network: dmz Static IP: 192.168.50.8 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.224 Gateway: 192.168.50.1 Custom Properties: Please select a key...
Network: Hosting Static IP: 192.168.100.7 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.240 Gateway: 192.168.100.1 Custom Properties: Please select a key...
Virtual Machines
Name: PruebaVLAN Host: srvovirt02.cnsc.net
Edit Network Interface
Name: nic1 Profile: dmz/dmz Type: VirtIO Custom MAC address: 00:00:1a:4a:3e:00 Link State: Up Card Status: Plugged
Network Interfaces in the Host srvovirt02.cnsc.net:
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master ovirtmgmt state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 4: ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 5: ens1f1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 6: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN link/ether 72:f8:9c:75:e3:86 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 7: ;vdsmdummy;: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 10: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master dmz state UNKNOWN qlen 500 link/ether fe:00:1a:4a:3e:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fc00:1aff:fe4a:3e00/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 17: eno2.50@eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master dmz state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 18: dmz: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.50.8/27 brd 192.168.50.31 scope global dmz valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 19: ens1f0.100@ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master Hosting state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 20: Hosting: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.100.7/28 brd 192.168.100.15 scope global Hosting valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 21: ovirtmgmt: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.0.63/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global ovirtmgmt valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2015-06-30 21:34 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14@gmail.com>:
You can count on it :)
2015-06-30 21:23 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:
Let us know how it works out, I am curious to see if having a untagged and tagged interface on the same bridge was an issue. On Jun 30, 2015 10:21 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Donny, Tomorrow I'm going to try this. :)
2015-06-30 21:12 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:
That tells me that there is a tagging issue between the host and the switch. Untagged traffic flows without issue via the same interface as tagged traffic. As a personal best practice I separate access ports(untagged) and trunk ports (tagged) traffic on different physical ports. Can you setup a separate phys interface for the tagged traffic, or must you be able to pass both on the same interface. On Jun 30, 2015 10:05 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
> My mgmt network works wonderfully, Virtual Machines created on the > mgmt even can reach Internet. But my company wants the traffic separated. > > Thanks Donny, I'm a RHCSA from Colombia, but I'm learning about > oVirt. (oVirt is a new thing in my country) > > P.S : I want to put VMware in the Trash Can too. ^_ ^ > > 2015-06-30 20:59 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: > >> There is a special place in my DC for vmware. TrashCan...lol >> On Jun 30, 2015 9:50 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm going to check it out... but how the host can reach the >>> Gateway and the Virtual Machine inside doesn't ? >>> >>> Donny you are very kind, this the last step to free my DataCenter >>> from VMware. >>> >>> 2015-06-30 20:46 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>> >>>> Does your switch have an IP on that vlan... I would step things >>>> out VM>host>switch>rtr >>>> >>>> You have already confirmed VM to host. >>>> >>>> I'm going to look at your screens again to make sure I didn't >>>> miss anything >>>> On Jun 30, 2015 9:42 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks for the explanation :) >>>>> >>>>> I set everything of the VLANs at oVirt, After I put a IP on the >>>>> Virtual Machine. But the Virtual Machine can't reach the gateway, The host >>>>> can do. The Virtual Machine only can reach the host. All the machines of >>>>> the range of net can reach the Virtual Machine. >>>>> >>>>> 2015-06-30 20:36 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm asking if your setting the vlan on the VM or at ovirt. >>>>>> >>>>>> More than likely if you are coming from VMware you have the >>>>>> Vlans set at the hypervisor. This does work in ovirt, I am doing it right >>>>>> now >>>>>> On Jun 30, 2015 9:31 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Mmmm I'm new in oVirt :( >>>>>>> >>>>>>> VMs Interface is Virtual MachineS Interface or VM Network >>>>>>> Interface in the host ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I configured the IP of the VLAN in the host. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I double check: the NIC of the Host has the VLAN assigned. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you help me ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2015-06-30 20:11 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are you configuring the vms interface with the vlan or >>>>>>>> tagging at the host. >>>>>>>> On Jun 30, 2015 7:28 PM, "Julián Tete" < >>>>>>>> danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Donny >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We have HP Switches (HP 5406zl) and they are configurated on >>>>>>>>> trunk mode. (VMware is configurated to use that). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Any suggestion ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for your response. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2015-06-30 17:51 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Vlans are layer 2, sounds like a tagging problem. Cisco >>>>>>>>>> switches? The tag sticks to the host bridge, but is being stripped off when >>>>>>>>>> it leaves the host.... Is your switch in access mode or trunk? >>>>>>>>>> Hi Friends of oVirt >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to migrate my company from VMware to oVirt. >>>>>>>>>> In my final tests, I set up 2 more VLANs in oVirt, (VM >>>>>>>>>> VLANs) >>>>>>>>>> The Virtual Machines in these VLANs, can be reached from >>>>>>>>>> the external IPs from the net range, >>>>>>>>>> but from the Virtual machines only can ping the Host with >>>>>>>>>> the Bridge and itself, can't reach the gateway. ¿? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I configured a IP Forwarding in the Host with the virtual >>>>>>>>>> machine, and nothing changes... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any idea ? This is the last duty before embrace oVirt in >>>>>>>>>> the company. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Look to the VLAN 100 configuration (My desired VM Network): >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/7hrog0a2n/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/68b40i1vr/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/lu6mlshgp/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/540o1qc0t/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/4kyg787bt/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/v7ralh7zb/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/kn903cl03/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For any idea, thanks in advance >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Users mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Users@ovirt.org >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >
Something isn't right. Are you using centos 7 for hosts or the node ISO. I just setup Vlans and it works just fine on my end. Try setting the switch ports to access mode with your Vlans, remove the tagging from ovirt and see if it works. I know that isn't how you want to set things up, but we need to start isolating things... Is it just the gateway.... Can you ping other machines on different subnets... What about pinging google On Jul 2, 2015 5:51 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
Don't work.... :'(
I'm going to try this:
*https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072027 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072027>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072027 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072027>*
2015-07-02 11:40 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14@gmail.com>:
I'm going to erase everything and the try this:
http://www.ovirt.org/QA:TestCase_Hosted_Engine_Tagged_VLAN_Support
2015-07-02 10:41 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14@gmail.com>:
I tried a different Aproach:
One VLAN for each NIC
I tried but not works.... I left the Virtual Machine pinging the Gateway after 10 minutes I left my Worstation alone and I went back to my home. Today i see the ping working (¿?) Maybe I rush too much...or maybe not.
I reboot the Virtual Machine, same problem: after 15 minutes the Machine can't reach the Gateway, we need HA and 10+ minutes it's not considerated.
After a I mess my oVirt LAB, after trying everything.
This my last working setup with sloooooooooow reaching of Gateway:
DATA CENTERS
Logical Networks: ----------- Name: ovirtmgmt Description: Management Network Network Label: 1 MTU: Default ----------- Name: dmz Description: VLAN 50 Network Label: 50 Enable VLAN tagging: 50 VM network MTU: Default ----------- Name: Hosting Description: VLAN 100 Network Label: 100 Enable VLAN tagging: 100 VM network MTU: Default ------------
CLUSTERS
Logical Networks
ovirtmgmt Assign Required Display Network Migration Network dmz Assign Hosting Assign Required
HOSTS
Name: srvovirt02.cnsc.net Hostname/IP: 192.168.0.63
Network Interfaces
HOSTS BOND VLAN NETWORK NAME ADDRESS MAC SPEED(Mbps) RX(Mbps) TX(Mbps)
eno1 * ovirtmgmt 192.168.0.63 00:17:a4:77:00:18 10000 < 1 < 1
eno2 eno2.50 (50) dmz 192.168.50.8 00:17:a4:77:00:1a 10000 < 1 < 1
ens1f0 ens1f0.100 (100) Hosting 192.168.100.7 00:17:a4:77:00:1c 10000 < 1 < 1
ens1f1 00:17:a4:77:00:1e 0 < 1 < 1
Setup Hosts Networks
Network: ovirtmgmt Static IP: 192.168.0.63 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0 Gateway: 192.168.0.1 Custom Properties: No available keys Sync network: Yes
Network: dmz Static IP: 192.168.50.8 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.224 Gateway: 192.168.50.1 Custom Properties: Please select a key...
Network: Hosting Static IP: 192.168.100.7 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.240 Gateway: 192.168.100.1 Custom Properties: Please select a key...
Virtual Machines
Name: PruebaVLAN Host: srvovirt02.cnsc.net
Edit Network Interface
Name: nic1 Profile: dmz/dmz Type: VirtIO Custom MAC address: 00:00:1a:4a:3e:00 Link State: Up Card Status: Plugged
Network Interfaces in the Host srvovirt02.cnsc.net:
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master ovirtmgmt state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 4: ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 5: ens1f1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 6: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN link/ether 72:f8:9c:75:e3:86 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 7: ;vdsmdummy;: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 10: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master dmz state UNKNOWN qlen 500 link/ether fe:00:1a:4a:3e:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fc00:1aff:fe4a:3e00/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 17: eno2.50@eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master dmz state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 18: dmz: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.50.8/27 brd 192.168.50.31 scope global dmz valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 19: ens1f0.100@ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master Hosting state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 20: Hosting: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.100.7/28 brd 192.168.100.15 scope global Hosting valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 21: ovirtmgmt: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.0.63/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global ovirtmgmt valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2015-06-30 21:34 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14@gmail.com>:
You can count on it :)
2015-06-30 21:23 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:
Let us know how it works out, I am curious to see if having a untagged and tagged interface on the same bridge was an issue. On Jun 30, 2015 10:21 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Donny, Tomorrow I'm going to try this. :)
2015-06-30 21:12 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:
> That tells me that there is a tagging issue between the host and the > switch. > Untagged traffic flows without issue via the same interface as > tagged traffic. > As a personal best practice I separate access ports(untagged) and > trunk ports (tagged) traffic on different physical ports. > Can you setup a separate phys interface for the tagged traffic, or > must you be able to pass both on the same interface. > On Jun 30, 2015 10:05 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> My mgmt network works wonderfully, Virtual Machines created on the >> mgmt even can reach Internet. But my company wants the traffic separated. >> >> Thanks Donny, I'm a RHCSA from Colombia, but I'm learning about >> oVirt. (oVirt is a new thing in my country) >> >> P.S : I want to put VMware in the Trash Can too. ^_ ^ >> >> 2015-06-30 20:59 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >> >>> There is a special place in my DC for vmware. TrashCan...lol >>> On Jun 30, 2015 9:50 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm going to check it out... but how the host can reach the >>>> Gateway and the Virtual Machine inside doesn't ? >>>> >>>> Donny you are very kind, this the last step to free my DataCenter >>>> from VMware. >>>> >>>> 2015-06-30 20:46 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>>> >>>>> Does your switch have an IP on that vlan... I would step things >>>>> out VM>host>switch>rtr >>>>> >>>>> You have already confirmed VM to host. >>>>> >>>>> I'm going to look at your screens again to make sure I didn't >>>>> miss anything >>>>> On Jun 30, 2015 9:42 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the explanation :) >>>>>> >>>>>> I set everything of the VLANs at oVirt, After I put a IP on the >>>>>> Virtual Machine. But the Virtual Machine can't reach the gateway, The host >>>>>> can do. The Virtual Machine only can reach the host. All the machines of >>>>>> the range of net can reach the Virtual Machine. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2015-06-30 20:36 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm asking if your setting the vlan on the VM or at ovirt. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> More than likely if you are coming from VMware you have the >>>>>>> Vlans set at the hypervisor. This does work in ovirt, I am doing it right >>>>>>> now >>>>>>> On Jun 30, 2015 9:31 PM, "Julián Tete" < >>>>>>> danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mmmm I'm new in oVirt :( >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> VMs Interface is Virtual MachineS Interface or VM Network >>>>>>>> Interface in the host ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I configured the IP of the VLAN in the host. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I double check: the NIC of the Host has the VLAN assigned. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you help me ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2015-06-30 20:11 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Are you configuring the vms interface with the vlan or >>>>>>>>> tagging at the host. >>>>>>>>> On Jun 30, 2015 7:28 PM, "Julián Tete" < >>>>>>>>> danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Donny >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We have HP Switches (HP 5406zl) and they are configurated >>>>>>>>>> on trunk mode. (VMware is configurated to use that). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any suggestion ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your response. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2015-06-30 17:51 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me> >>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Vlans are layer 2, sounds like a tagging problem. Cisco >>>>>>>>>>> switches? The tag sticks to the host bridge, but is being stripped off when >>>>>>>>>>> it leaves the host.... Is your switch in access mode or trunk? >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Friends of oVirt >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to migrate my company from VMware to oVirt. >>>>>>>>>>> In my final tests, I set up 2 more VLANs in oVirt, (VM >>>>>>>>>>> VLANs) >>>>>>>>>>> The Virtual Machines in these VLANs, can be reached from >>>>>>>>>>> the external IPs from the net range, >>>>>>>>>>> but from the Virtual machines only can ping the Host with >>>>>>>>>>> the Bridge and itself, can't reach the gateway. ¿? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I configured a IP Forwarding in the Host with the virtual >>>>>>>>>>> machine, and nothing changes... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Any idea ? This is the last duty before embrace oVirt in >>>>>>>>>>> the company. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Look to the VLAN 100 configuration (My desired VM Network): >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/7hrog0a2n/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/68b40i1vr/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/lu6mlshgp/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/540o1qc0t/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/4kyg787bt/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/v7ralh7zb/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/kn903cl03/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For any idea, thanks in advance >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Users@ovirt.org >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>
participants (2)
-
Donny Davis -
Julián Tete