GlusterFS rebase for oVirt 4.3
According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's safe to move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0. This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3: CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2] If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which should work with current oVirt code. Sahina, can you give directions on what we should move to? Thanks. [1] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/ [2] http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/storage/ppc64le/ -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's safe to move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3: CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]
If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which should work with current oVirt code.
Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2 is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in. HTH, Niels PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
Sahina, can you give directions on what we should move to?
Thanks.
[1] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/ [2] http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/storage/ppc64le/
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/IQYAWSN5KLO5OQ...
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's safe to move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3: CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]
If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which should work with current oVirt code.
Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2 is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
HTH, Niels
PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5. Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS? Also, for oVirt 4.2 due to dependency on gluster-gnfs we are still dependent on gluster 3.12 which is EOL. What's our best option here? Shyam, Amar, looking for your inputs.
Sahina, can you give directions on what we should move to?
Thanks.
[1] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/ [2] http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/storage/ppc64le/
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/IQYAWSN5KLO5OQ...
Il giorno lun 19 nov 2018 alle ore 14:42 Sahina Bose <sabose@redhat.com> ha scritto:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's
safe to
move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3: CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]
If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which should work with current oVirt code.
Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2 is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
HTH, Niels
PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5. Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?
Also, for oVirt 4.2 due to dependency on gluster-gnfs we are still dependent on gluster 3.12 which is EOL. What's our best option here? Shyam, Amar, looking for your inputs.
Raising this again since we are in a bit of a hurry for this to be changed. this change already missed 4.3.0 Alpha, it would be nice to get it in by beta release.
Sahina, can you give directions on what we should move to?
Thanks.
[1] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/ [2] http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/storage/ppc64le/
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/IQYAWSN5KLO5OQ...
-- SANDRO BONAZZOLA MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 02:02:42PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il giorno lun 19 nov 2018 alle ore 14:42 Sahina Bose <sabose@redhat.com> ha scritto:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's
safe to
move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3: CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]
If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which should work with current oVirt code.
Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2 is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
HTH, Niels
PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5. Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?
Also, for oVirt 4.2 due to dependency on gluster-gnfs we are still dependent on gluster 3.12 which is EOL. What's our best option here? Shyam, Amar, looking for your inputs.
Raising this again since we are in a bit of a hurry for this to be changed. this change already missed 4.3.0 Alpha, it would be nice to get it in by beta release.
I think we can keep gluster-3.12 on the CentOS mirrors, but without centos-release-gluster312 in CentOS Extras? If there is a demand for NFS, then integrating NFS-Ganesha is your best option. But this is not a drop-in replacement and will need some work. In case there is no need for NFS, then it will be easier to move to a FUSE mount or libgfapi application. Niels
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's safe to move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3: CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]
If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which should work with current oVirt code.
Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2 is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
HTH, Niels
PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5. Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?
We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a few days? Niels
Top posting 1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all probability will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for this decision. (as Niels stated) 2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and possibly the best outcome for this issue Shyam On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's safe to move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3: CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]
If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which should work with current oVirt code.
Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2 is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
HTH, Niels
PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5. Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?
We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a few days?
Niels
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
Top posting
1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all probability will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for this decision. (as Niels stated)
2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and possibly the best outcome for this issue
Well, I guess so. oVirt does not seem to use the centos-release-gluster* packages, so they can consume the gluster-5 repository just like they do now. Gluster 5 has not been announced on the CentOS lists as the centos-release-gluster* packages still need to be pushed to CentOS Extras (and that will be done when CentOS 7.6 is available). Niels
Shyam
On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's safe to move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3: CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]
If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which should work with current oVirt code.
Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2 is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
HTH, Niels
PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5. Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?
We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a few days?
Niels
Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:13 Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> ha scritto:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
Top posting
1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all probability will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for this decision. (as Niels stated)
2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and possibly the best outcome for this issue
Well, I guess so. oVirt does not seem to use the centos-release-gluster* packages, so they can consume the gluster-5 repository just like they do now. Gluster 5 has not been announced on the CentOS lists as the centos-release-gluster* packages still need to be pushed to CentOS Extras (and that will be done when CentOS 7.6 is available).
Only issue I see with consuming Gluster 5 is that it's not available in Fedora 28, so in order to consume it we need either to switch to Fedora 29 or backport it on Fedora 28
Niels
Shyam
On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's
safe to
move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3: CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and
wrote: ppc64le[2]
If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on
glusterd which
should work with current oVirt code.
Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2 is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
HTH, Niels
PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5. Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?
We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a few days?
Niels
-- SANDRO BONAZZOLA MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:13 Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> ha scritto:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
Top posting
1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all probability will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for this decision. (as Niels stated)
2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and possibly the best outcome for this issue
Well, I guess so. oVirt does not seem to use the centos-release-gluster* packages, so they can consume the gluster-5 repository just like they do now. Gluster 5 has not been announced on the CentOS lists as the centos-release-gluster* packages still need to be pushed to CentOS Extras (and that will be done when CentOS 7.6 is available).
Only issue I see with consuming Gluster 5 is that it's not available in Fedora 28, so in order to consume it we need either to switch to Fedora 29 or backport it on Fedora 28
We don't update the versions in Fedora releases. However we do provide the packages here: https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/ Can you use that repository? Niels
Niels
Shyam
On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's
safe to
> move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0. > > This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3: > CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and
wrote: ppc64le[2]
> > If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a > significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which > should work with current oVirt code.
Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2 is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
HTH, Niels
PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5. Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?
We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a few days?
Niels
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>
Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:39 Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> ha scritto:
Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:13 Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com
ha scritto:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
Top posting
1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all
will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for this decision. (as Niels stated)
2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: probability possibly
the best outcome for this issue
Well, I guess so. oVirt does not seem to use the centos-release-gluster* packages, so they can consume the gluster-5 repository just like they do now. Gluster 5 has not been announced on the CentOS lists as the centos-release-gluster* packages still need to be pushed to CentOS Extras (and that will be done when CentOS 7.6 is available).
Only issue I see with consuming Gluster 5 is that it's not available in Fedora 28, so in order to consume it we need either to switch to Fedora 29 or backport it on Fedora 28
We don't update the versions in Fedora releases. However we do provide the packages here: https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/
Can you use that repository?
Yes, thanks
Niels
Niels
Shyam
On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >> According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and
it's
>> move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0. >> >> This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3: >> CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and
safe to ppc64le[2]
>> >> If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a >> significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which >> should work with current oVirt code. > > Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2 > is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in. > > HTH, > Niels > > > PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the > centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5. Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?
We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a few days?
Niels
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>
-- SANDRO BONAZZOLA MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>
Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:56 Sandro Bonazzola < sbonazzo@redhat.com> ha scritto:
Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:39 Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> ha scritto:
Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:13 Niels de Vos < ndevos@redhat.com> ha scritto:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
Top posting
1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all
will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for this decision. (as Niels stated)
2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: probability possibly
the best outcome for this issue
Well, I guess so. oVirt does not seem to use the centos-release-gluster* packages, so they can consume the gluster-5 repository just like they do now. Gluster 5 has not been announced on the CentOS lists as the centos-release-gluster* packages still need to be pushed to CentOS Extras (and that will be done when CentOS 7.6 is available).
Only issue I see with consuming Gluster 5 is that it's not available in Fedora 28, so in order to consume it we need either to switch to Fedora 29 or backport it on Fedora 28
We don't update the versions in Fedora releases. However we do provide the packages here: https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/
Can you use that repository?
Yes, thanks
here's the patch for switching to Gluster 5: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95833/
Niels
Niels
Shyam
On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola
wrote:
>>> According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's safe to >>> move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0. >>> >>> This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3: >>> CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2] >>> >>> If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a >>> significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which >>> should work with current oVirt code. >> >> Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2 >> is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in. >> >> HTH, >> Niels >> >> >> PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the >> centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available > > I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5. > Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?
We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a few days?
Niels
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>
-- SANDRO BONAZZOLA MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>
participants (4)
-
Niels de Vos -
Sahina Bose -
Sandro Bonazzola -
Shyam Ranganathan