+1, glad to hear that. On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:32 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
I am starting to see master jobs passing so it seems the issue is resolved
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/Change%20queue%20jobs/job/ovirt-master_change...
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 5:54 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:
I'm back at the office tomorrow, let me know if anything else else is needed.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, 17:34 Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
openvswitch2.10 was tagged and Gal just merged: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/
I re-triggered latest changes from failed projects and will update once I see results.
thanks, Dafna
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
sandro was away for a few days. maybe eyal or Rafael Martins can help with the tagging issue
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM Galit Rosenthal <grosenth@redhat.com> wrote:
Any updates, still failing?
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:49 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
adding sandron
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: > > my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using > openvswitch2.9 and > > not 2.10 > > is that package bump merged? > > No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged. > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso > > <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the > issue in > >> > upgrade > >> > I do see that > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ > >> > has > >> > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and > dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so > >> > hope > >> > it would grab the correct one. > >> > > >> > >> I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that > works. > >> That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push > the > >> latest one available. > >> > >> Fingers crossed. > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso > >> > <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> >> > Hi, > >> >> > > >> >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite. > >> >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk > deps. > >> >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there > are some > >> >> > issues > >> >> > with dependencies. > >> >> > > >> >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can > you > >> >> > please > >> >> > update on the issue? > >> >> > > >> >> > full log is here; > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifac... > >> >> > > >> >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: > >> >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ > >> >> > > >> >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks, > >> >> > Dafna > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Hi all, > >> >> > >> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. > >> >> > >> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk > libraries, > >> >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. > >> >> > >> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the > current > >> >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us > dpdk > >> >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. > >> >> > >> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not > openvswitch 2.9 > >> >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled > in the > >> >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch > because > >> >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not > the > >> >> *extras*. > >> >> > >> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using > ovs-2.10 with > >> >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. > >> >> > >> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using > ovs-2.10 > >> >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host > yum.log - at > >> >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. > >> >> > >> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what > we want to > >> >> deliver: > >> >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig > >> >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from > centos > >> >> extra packages > > @Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump > the ovs version > > >> >> > >> >> [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 > >> >> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ > >> >> [2] - > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ > >> >> [3] - > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ > >> >> [4] - > >> >> > >> >> > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/export... > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >
--
GALIT ROSENTHAL
SOFTWARE ENGINEER
Red Hat
galit@gmail.com T: 972-9-7692230 <https://red.ht/sig>
-- Eyal edri MANAGER RHV/CNV DevOps EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)