12:02 p.m.
Hi,
From vdsm code i can see support for storage domain of type SHARED_FS
But when trying to configure a new storage domain, i don't see SHARED_FS
as a available domtype filed in the dropdown.
I want to use shared FS to connect to try and connect to gluster mount
point on my node, but unable to as I don't see that option.
From http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/PosixFSConnection - I understand
that its the same as sharedFS, so what is PosixFSConnection then, is it
just a new interface that provides a wrapper for what is sharedFS now ?
The status of this says Done, but I don't see the UI part of this, am I
missing something.
Also pls let me know if usign sharedFS to make the node use gluster mount
is correct or not ?
thanx,
deepak
4:07 p.m.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 02:32:35PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
Hi,
From vdsm code i can see support for storage domain of type SHARED_FS
But when trying to configure a new storage domain, i don't see SHARED_FS
as a available domtype filed in the dropdown.
I want to use shared FS to connect to try and connect to gluster mount
point on my node, but unable to as I don't see that option.
From http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/PosixFSConnection - I understand
that its the same as sharedFS, so what is PosixFSConnection then, is it
just a new interface that provides a wrapper for what is sharedFS now ?
Currently, the NAS the ovirt supports are local file system, and NFS.
The status of this says Done, but I don't see the UI part of this, am I
missing something.
Look closer in
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/PosixFSConnection#Current_Status ..
Vdsm has API support for mounting any Posix file system. but this is not
yet available from oVirt Engine and GUI.
Also pls let me know if usign sharedFS to make the node use gluster mount
is correct or not ?
I do not think that anyone has tried this.. be the first!
8:24 a.m.
On 02/22/2012 06:37 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 02:32:35PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
> Hi,
> From vdsm code i can see support for storage domain of type SHARED_FS
> But when trying to configure a new storage domain, i don't see SHARED_FS
> as a available domtype filed in the dropdown.
> I want to use shared FS to connect to try and connect to
gluster mount
> point on my node, but unable to as I don't see that option.
> From http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/PosixFSConnection
- I understand
> that its the same as sharedFS, so what is PosixFSConnection then, is it
> just a new interface that provides a wrapper for what is sharedFS now ?
Currently, the NAS the ovirt supports are local file system, and NFS.
> The status of this says Done, but I don't see the UI part of this, am I
> missing something.
Look closer in
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/PosixFSConnection#Current_Status ..
Vdsm has API support for mounting any Posix file system. but this is not
yet available from oVirt Engine and GUI.
> Also pls let me know if usign sharedFS to make the node use gluster mount
> is correct or not ?
I do not think that anyone has tried this.. be the first!
Sure :), but how ? since there is no UI support yet.
Is there a way I can use the vdsm cli to drive, any ovirt wiki page
that helps provide insight on how to use vdsm cli ?
2:24 p.m.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:54:26AM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 02/22/2012 06:37 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 02:32:35PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
>>Hi,
>> From vdsm code i can see support for storage domain of type SHARED_FS
>>But when trying to configure a new storage domain, i don't see SHARED_FS
>>as a available domtype filed in the dropdown.
>>
>>I want to use shared FS to connect to try and connect to gluster mount
>>point on my node, but unable to as I don't see that option.
>>
>> From http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/PosixFSConnection - I understand
>>that its the same as sharedFS, so what is PosixFSConnection then, is it
>>just a new interface that provides a wrapper for what is sharedFS now ?
>Currently, the NAS the ovirt supports are local file system, and NFS.
>>The status of this says Done, but I don't see the UI part of this, am I
>>missing something.
>Look closer in
>http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/PosixFSConnection#Current_Status ..
>
>Vdsm has API support for mounting any Posix file system. but this is not
>yet available from oVirt Engine and GUI.
>
>>Also pls let me know if usign sharedFS to make the node use gluster mount
>>is correct or not ?
>I do not think that anyone has tried this.. be the first!
Sure :), but how ? since there is no UI support yet.
Is there a way I can use the vdsm cli to drive, any ovirt wiki page
that helps provide insight on how to use vdsm cli ?
I'd start from http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Vdsm_Standalone
and tweak it to use SHAREDFS_DOMAIN instead of LOCALFS_DOMAIN
You'd have to do some digging into vdsm/storage/storage_connection.py
for the right params to connectStorageServer.
Dan.
4:03 p.m.
On 02/23/2012 04:54 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:54:26AM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
> On 02/22/2012 06:37 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 02:32:35PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> From vdsm code i can see support for storage domain of type SHARED_FS
>>> But when trying to configure a new storage domain, i don't see SHARED_FS
>>> as a available domtype filed in the dropdown.
>>>
>>> I want to use shared FS to connect to try and connect to gluster mount
>>> point on my node, but unable to as I don't see that option.
>>>
>>> From http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/PosixFSConnection - I understand
>>> that its the same as sharedFS, so what is PosixFSConnection then, is it
>>> just a new interface that provides a wrapper for what is sharedFS now ?
>> Currently, the NAS the ovirt supports are local file system, and NFS.
>>> The status of this says Done, but I don't see the UI part of this, am I
>>> missing something.
>> Look closer in
>> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/PosixFSConnection#Current_Status ..
>>
>> Vdsm has API support for mounting any Posix file system. but this is not
>> yet available from oVirt Engine and GUI.
>>
>>> Also pls let me know if usign sharedFS to make the node use gluster mount
>>> is correct or not ?
>> I do not think that anyone has tried this.. be the first!
> Sure :), but how ? since there is no UI support yet.
> Is there a way I can use the vdsm cli to drive, any ovirt wiki page
> that helps provide insight on how to use vdsm cli ?
I'd start from http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Vdsm_Standalone
and tweak it to use SHAREDFS_DOMAIN instead of LOCALFS_DOMAIN
You'd have to do some digging into vdsm/storage/storage_connection.py
for the right params to connectStorageServer.
Great, let me start and get back if i land up into issues.
thanks for the pointer.
Dan.
2:25 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
On 02/23/2012 04:54 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:54:26AM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
>> On 02/22/2012 06:37 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 02:32:35PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> From vdsm code i can see support for storage domain of type
>>>> SHARED_FS
>>>> But when trying to configure a new storage domain, i don't see
>>>> SHARED_FS
>>>> as a available domtype filed in the dropdown.
>>>>
>>>> I want to use shared FS to connect to try and connect to gluster
>>>> mount
>>>> point on my node, but unable to as I don't see that option.
>>>>
>>>> From http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/PosixFSConnection - I
>>>> understand
>>>> that its the same as sharedFS, so what is PosixFSConnection
>>>> then, is it
>>>> just a new interface that provides a wrapper for what is
>>>> sharedFS now ?
>>> Currently, the NAS the ovirt supports are local file system, and
>>> NFS.
>>>> The status of this says Done, but I don't see the UI part of
>>>> this, am I
>>>> missing something.
>>> Look closer in
>>> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/PosixFSConnection#Current_Status
>>> ..
>>>
>>> Vdsm has API support for mounting any Posix file system. but this
>>> is not
>>> yet available from oVirt Engine and GUI.
>>>
>>>> Also pls let me know if usign sharedFS to make the node use
>>>> gluster mount
>>>> is correct or not ?
>>> I do not think that anyone has tried this.. be the first!
>> Sure :), but how ? since there is no UI support yet.
>> Is there a way I can use the vdsm cli to drive, any ovirt wiki
>> page
>> that helps provide insight on how to use vdsm cli ?
> I'd start from http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Vdsm_Standalone
> and tweak it to use SHAREDFS_DOMAIN instead of LOCALFS_DOMAIN
>
> You'd have to do some digging into
> vdsm/storage/storage_connection.py
> for the right params to connectStorageServer.
Any help on documenting this so people would not have to dig into the code would be
greatly appreciated.
>
Great, let me start and get back if i land up into issues.
thanks for the pointer.
Let us know if you need further assistance..
> Dan.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
5:12 p.m.
On 02/27/2012 04:55 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
Any help on documenting this so people would not have to dig into the code would be
greatly appreciated.
> Great, let me start and get back if i land up into issues.
> thanks for the pointer.
Let us know if you need further assistance..
This is how I plan to attack it... using vdscli, let me know if my steps
are correct ?
1) Use createStorageDomain to create a SHAREDFS_DOMAIN of domTypes data
& iso
2) Use createStoragePool and associate the above sd's with this pool.
3) How to copy .iso into the newly create iso dom ? engine-iso-uploader
won't know abt it, rite ?
4) create a volume to represent my vm disk
5) Use create to create a VM and run it
Is this the recommended way ( to use individual vdscli cmds) or the way
its done in
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Vdsm_Standalone ?
5:36 p.m.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 07:42:15PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 02/27/2012 04:55 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
>
>Any help on documenting this so people would not have to dig into the code would be
greatly appreciated.
>
>>Great, let me start and get back if i land up into issues.
>>thanks for the pointer.
>Let us know if you need further assistance..
This is how I plan to attack it... using vdscli, let me know if my
steps are correct ?
1) Use createStorageDomain to create a SHAREDFS_DOMAIN of domTypes
data & iso
2) Use createStoragePool and associate the above sd's with this pool.
3) How to copy .iso into the newly create iso dom ?
engine-iso-uploader won't know abt it, rite ?
I would've used `cp` (chown to make sure vdsm can read it when needed).
4) create a volume to represent my vm disk
5) Use create to create a VM and run it
Is this the recommended way ( to use individual vdscli cmds) or the
way its done in
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Vdsm_Standalone ?
For human-triggered setup, running vdsClient from bash may be easier.
But the suggested python script is expected to take you slightly further
on the road to reproducible testable application on top of Vdsm.
If you have that python script working for LOCALFS, I'd suggest you try
making it work for SHAREDFS too.
6:08 p.m.
New subject: [Users] new wiki for ovirt-engine-cli
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/CLI
--
Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
8:44 a.m.
New subject: [Users] new wiki for ovirt-engine-cli
On 02/29/2012 08:38 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
I would like to see something similar for VDSM cli (vdsClient) :)
10:31 a.m.
New subject: [Users] new wiki for ovirt-engine-cli
On 03/01/2012 07:44 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 02/29/2012 08:38 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/CLI
>
I would like to see something similar for VDSM cli (vdsClient) :)
vdsm-cli doesn't deal with users too much.
we'll need a password file approach, session absed handling or kerberos
to close this gap.
10:40 a.m.
New subject: [Users] new wiki for ovirt-engine-cli
On 03/01/2012 09:31 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 03/01/2012 07:44 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
> On 02/29/2012 08:38 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
>> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/CLI
>>
> I would like to see something similar for VDSM cli (vdsClient) :)
vdsm-cli doesn't deal with users too much.
we'll need a password file approach, session absed handling or kerberos to close this
gap.
adding this to my TODO list.
--
Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
10:38 a.m.
New subject: [Users] new wiki for ovirt-engine-cli
On 03/01/2012 07:44 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 02/29/2012 08:38 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/CLI
>
I would like to see something similar for VDSM cli (vdsClient) :)
if VDSM api will expose RSDL (RESTful service description language), we could
generate SDK [1] for it and then very same cli can be used against this sdk
[1] our ovirt-engine-sdk [2] is auto-generated from RSDL exposed in ovirt-engine-api
[2] http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/SDK
--
Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
5:51 p.m.
New subject: [Users] new wiki for ovirt-engine-cli
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:38:41AM +0200, Michael Pasternak wrote:
On 03/01/2012 07:44 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
> On 02/29/2012 08:38 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
>> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/CLI
>>
> I would like to see something similar for VDSM cli (vdsClient) :)
>
if VDSM api will expose RSDL (RESTful service description language), we could
generate SDK [1] for it and then very same cli can be used against this sdk
[1] our ovirt-engine-sdk [2] is auto-generated from RSDL exposed in ovirt-engine-api
[2] http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/SDK
REST API for Vdsm is in the works, http://gerrit.ovirt.org/2021
but I am not sure that mixing the layers and having one cli to Engine and Vdsm
makes sense. In fact, I would guess that Engine would not be surprised if you
spring a VM below its feet, or migrate an existing VM.
That's why vdsClient is considered and test and debug tool.
6:14 p.m.
New subject: [Users] new wiki for ovirt-engine-cli
On 03/04/2012 04:51 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:38:41AM +0200, Michael Pasternak wrote:
>
> On 03/01/2012 07:44 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
>> On 02/29/2012 08:38 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
>>> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/CLI
>>>
>> I would like to see something similar for VDSM cli (vdsClient) :)
>>
>
> if VDSM api will expose RSDL (RESTful service description language), we could
> generate SDK [1] for it and then very same cli can be used against this sdk
>
> [1] our ovirt-engine-sdk [2] is auto-generated from RSDL exposed in ovirt-engine-api
> [2] http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/SDK
REST API for Vdsm is in the works, http://gerrit.ovirt.org/2021
but I am not sure that mixing the layers and having one cli to Engine and Vdsm
makes sense.
it's not mixing of two CLIs, if vdsm will expose RSDL, will be generated vdsm sdk,
i.e cli will be completely different as it will work against vdsm sdk,
all I'm saying that if vdsm will expose RSDL, it will get sdk/cli for free ...
In fact, I would guess that Engine would not be surprised if you
spring a VM below its feet, or migrate an existing VM.
That's why vdsClient is considered and test and debug tool.
--
Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
8:55 a.m.
On 02/29/2012 08:06 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 07:42:15PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
> On 02/27/2012 04:55 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
>> Any help on documenting this so people would not have to dig into the code would
be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>> Great, let me start and get back if i land up into issues.
>>> thanks for the pointer.
>> Let us know if you need further assistance..
> This is how I plan to attack it... using vdscli, let me know if my
> steps are correct ?
>
> 1) Use createStorageDomain to create a SHAREDFS_DOMAIN of domTypes
> data& iso
> 2) Use createStoragePool and associate the above sd's with this pool.
> 3) How to copy .iso into the newly create iso dom ?
> engine-iso-uploader won't know abt it, rite ?
I would've used `cp` (chown to make sure vdsm can read it when needed).
engine-iso-uploader create the needed dir structure (metadata, images,
dom_md etc)
and put the .iso in the right dir. Using `cp` I will have to do that
myself, rite ?
> 4) create a volume to represent my vm disk
> 5) Use create to create a VM and run it
>
> Is this the recommended way ( to use individual vdscli cmds) or the
> way its done in
> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Vdsm_Standalone ?
>
For human-triggered setup, running vdsClient from bash may be easier.
But the suggested python script is expected to take you slightly further
on the road to reproducible testable application on top of Vdsm.
If you have that python script working for LOCALFS, I'd suggest you try
making it work for SHAREDFS too.
Thanks, will try using the python script itself. When i use the script
and create LOCALFS (and SHAREDFS in future) will these domains
and hence VMs created on top of these domains be visible and manageable
from OE side ?
10:26 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
On 02/29/2012 08:06 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 07:42:15PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
>> On 02/27/2012 04:55 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
>>> Any help on documenting this so people would not have to dig into
>>> the code would be greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>>> Great, let me start and get back if i land up into issues.
>>>> thanks for the pointer.
>>> Let us know if you need further assistance..
>> This is how I plan to attack it... using vdscli, let me know if my
>> steps are correct ?
>>
>> 1) Use createStorageDomain to create a SHAREDFS_DOMAIN of domTypes
>> data& iso
>> 2) Use createStoragePool and associate the above sd's with this
>> pool.
>> 3) How to copy .iso into the newly create iso dom ?
>> engine-iso-uploader won't know abt it, rite ?
> I would've used `cp` (chown to make sure vdsm can read it when
> needed).
>
engine-iso-uploader create the needed dir structure (metadata,
images,
dom_md etc)
and put the .iso in the right dir. Using `cp` I will have to do that
myself, rite ?
No. createStorageDomain does all that for you, engine-iso-uploader just copies the iso
files and sets permissions (at least I hope that's all it does).
>> 4) create a volume to represent my vm disk
>> 5) Use create to create a VM and run it
>>
>> Is this the recommended way ( to use individual vdscli cmds) or
>> the
>> way its done in
>> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Vdsm_Standalone ?
>>
> For human-triggered setup, running vdsClient from bash may be
> easier.
> But the suggested python script is expected to take you slightly
> further
> on the road to reproducible testable application on top of Vdsm.
>
> If you have that python script working for LOCALFS, I'd suggest you
> try
> making it work for SHAREDFS too.
>
Thanks, will try using the python script itself. When i use the
script
and create LOCALFS (and SHAREDFS in future) will these domains
and hence VMs created on top of these domains be visible and
manageable
from OE side ?
7:45 p.m.
On 02/29/2012 08:06 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 07:42:15PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
> On 02/27/2012 04:55 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
>> Any help on documenting this so people would not have to dig into the code would
be greatly appreciated.
> >>> Great, let me start and get back if i land up into
issues.
>>> thanks for the pointer.
>> Let us know if you need further assistance..
> This is how I plan to attack it... using vdscli, let me know if my
> steps are correct ?
> 1) Use createStorageDomain to create a SHAREDFS_DOMAIN of
domTypes
> data& iso
> 2) Use createStoragePool and associate the above sd's with this pool.
> 3) How to copy .iso into the newly create iso dom ?
> engine-iso-uploader won't know abt it, rite ?
I would've used `cp` (chown to make sure vdsm can read it when needed).
> 4) create a volume to represent my vm disk
> 5) Use create to create a VM and run it
> Is this the recommended way ( to use individual vdscli
cmds) or the
> way its done in
> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Vdsm_Standalone ?
For human-triggered setup, running vdsClient from bash may be
easier.
But the suggested python script is expected to take you slightly further
on the road to reproducible testable application on top of Vdsm.
If you have that python script working for LOCALFS, I'd suggest you try
making it work for SHAREDFS too.
Hi All
Getting this error, while doing createStorageDomain for SHAREDFS
From vdsm.log
-------------------
Thread-29::DEBUG::2012-03-06
03:35:27,127::safelease::53::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(initLock) FAILED:
<err> = "panic: [11002] can't open '%s':
/rhev/data-center/mnt/llm65.in.ibm.com:dpkvol/ff214060-642d-43b7-ac51-23278371ee1f/dom_md/leases:
(Invalid argument)\n"; <rc> = 255
Thread-29::WARNING::2012-03-06
03:35:27,127::safelease::55::ClusterLock::(initLock) could not
initialise spm lease (255): []
Thread-29::WARNING::2012-03-06
03:35:27,127::sd::328::Storage.StorageDomain::(initSPMlease) lease did
not initialize successfully
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/sd.py", line 324, in initSPMlease
safelease.ClusterLock.initLock(self._getLeasesFilePath())
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/safelease.py", line 56, in initLock
raise se.ClusterLockInitError()
ClusterLockInitError: Could not initialize cluster lock: ()
Thread-29::INFO::2012-03-06
03:35:27,128::logUtils::39::dispatcher::(wrapper) Run and protect:
createStorageDomain, Return response: None
Getting the below error when trying to createStoragePool...
From vdsm.log
-------------------
Thread-35::DEBUG::2012-03-06
03:35:27,323::safelease::72::ClusterLock::(acquire) Acquiring cluster
lock for domain ff214060-642d-43b7-ac51-23278371ee1f
Thread-35::DEBUG::2012-03-06
03:35:27,323::safelease::81::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(acquire)
'/usr/bin/sudo -n /usr/bin/setsid /usr/bin/ionice -c1 -n0 /bin/su vdsm
-s /bin/sh -c "/usr/libexec/vdsm/spmprotect.sh start
ff214060-642d-43b7-ac51-23278371ee1f 1000 5
/rhev/data-center/mnt/llm65.in.ibm.com:dpkvol/ff214060-642d-43b7-ac51-23278371ee1f/dom_md/leases
30000 1000 3"' (cwd /usr/libexec/vdsm)
Thread-35::DEBUG::2012-03-06
03:35:27,374::safelease::81::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(acquire) FAILED:
<err> = "panic: [11019] can't open '%s':
/rhev/data-center/mnt/llm65.in.ibm.com:dpkvol/ff214060-642d-43b7-ac51-23278371ee1f/dom_md/leases:
(Invalid argument)\n"; <rc> = 1
Thread-35::ERROR::2012-03-06
03:35:27,374::task::855::TaskManager.Task::(_setError)
Task=`4d02e106-5d7c-4373-a834-5d5f4ea297be`::Unexpected error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 863, in _run
return fn(*args, **kargs)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/logUtils.py", line 38, in wrapper
res = f(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 694, in createStoragePool
return sp.StoragePool(spUUID, self.taskMng).create(poolName,
masterDom, domList, masterVersion, safeLease)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/sp.py", line 546, in create
msd.acquireClusterLock(self.id)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/sd.py", line 379, in acquireClusterLock
self._clusterLock.acquire(hostID)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/safelease.py", line 83, in acquire
raise se.AcquireLockFailure(self._sdUUID, rc, out, err)
AcquireLockFailure: Could not obtain lock:
'id=ff214060-642d-43b7-ac51-23278371ee1f, rc=1, out=[], err=["panic:
[11019] can\'t open \'%s\':
/rhev/data-center/mnt/llm65.in.ibm.com:dpkvol/ff214060-642d-43b7-ac51-23278371ee1f/dom_md/leases:
(Invalid argument)"]'
Thread-35::DEBUG::2012-03-06
03:35:27,376::task::874::TaskManager.Task::(_run)
Task=`4d02e106-5d7c-4373-a834-5d5f4ea297be`::Task._run:
4d02e106-5d7c-4373-a834-5d5f4ea297be (6,
'82350e39-5940-48c0-81b3-c9955ada0f08', 'my gluster pool',
'ff214060-642d-43b7-ac51-23278371ee1f',
['ff214060-642d-43b7-ac51-23278371ee1f'], 1) {} failed - stopping task
for it.
Thread-35::DEBUG::2012-03-06
03:35:27,381::resourceManager::562::ResourceManager::(releaseResource)
No one is waiting for resource
'Storage.82350e39-5940-48c0-81b3-c9955ada0f08', Clearing records.
Thread-35::ERROR::2012-03-06
03:35:27,381::dispatcher::90::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run)
{'status': {'message': 'Could not obtain lock:
\'id=ff214060-642d-43b7-ac51-23278371ee1f, rc=1, out=[], err=["panic:
[11019] can\\\'t open \\\'%s\\\':
/rhev/data-center/mnt/llm65.in.ibm.com:dpkvol/ff214060-642d-43b7-ac51-23278371ee1f/dom_md/leases:
(Invalid argument)"]\'', 'code': 651}}
4:34 p.m.
On 02/29/2012 08:06 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 07:42:15PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
> On 02/27/2012 04:55 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
>> Any help on documenting this so people would not have to dig into the code would
be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>> Great, let me start and get back if i land up into issues.
>>> thanks for the pointer.
>> Let us know if you need further assistance..
>
If you have that python script working for LOCALFS, I'd suggest you try
making it work for SHAREDFS too.
I was able to use the VDSM_Standalone example, and modify it to use SHAREDFS
and export glusterfs as a DATA_DOMAIN and invoke VM backed by gluster
storage.
I edited http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Vdsm_Standalone (scroll below) &
added it as
a SHAREDFS example.
12:37 p.m.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:04:47PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 02/29/2012 08:06 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 07:42:15PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
>>On 02/27/2012 04:55 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
>>>Any help on documenting this so people would not have to dig into the code
would be greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>>>Great, let me start and get back if i land up into issues.
>>>>thanks for the pointer.
>>>Let us know if you need further assistance..
>>
>If you have that python script working for LOCALFS, I'd suggest you try
>making it work for SHAREDFS too.
>
>
I was able to use the VDSM_Standalone example, and modify it to use SHAREDFS
and export glusterfs as a DATA_DOMAIN and invoke VM backed by
gluster storage.
I edited http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Vdsm_Standalone (scroll below) &
added it as
a SHAREDFS example.
Thanks! It is great news that all you need is O_DIRECT in fuse, and that
Vdsm's SHAREDFS interface works as it is for gluster.
Regards,
Dan.
3:50 p.m.
On 03/19/2012 03:07 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:04:47PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
> On 02/29/2012 08:06 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>> Let us know if you need further assistance..
>> If you have that python script working for LOCALFS, I'd suggest you try
>> making it work for SHAREDFS too.
>>
>>
> I was able to use the VDSM_Standalone example, and modify it to use SHAREDFS
> and export glusterfs as a DATA_DOMAIN and invoke VM backed by
> gluster storage.
>
> I edited http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Vdsm_Standalone (scroll below)&
> added it as
> a SHAREDFS example.
Thanks! It is great news that all you need is O_DIRECT in fuse, and that
Vdsm's SHAREDFS interface works as it is for gluster.
Regards,
Dan.
Hello,
Got more questions on this, now that I am re-visiting this.
The last time i tried using SHAREDFS, i started from createStorageDomain
verb, and it works fine.
But now we have connectStorageServer verb... which i believe is the new
way of doing things ?
If i start from connectStorageServer verb to mount using SHAREDFS (
which goes via PosixFs... MountConnection flow), that won't help me
entirely here, right ?
Because it only mounts based on the dict sent, but does not do anything
with the image and metadata stuff ( which createStorageDomain flow did ).
I am wondering if its too early to start using connectStorageServer ? If
not, how can i re-write the above vdsm standalone example using
connectStorageServer instead of createStorageDomain flow ?
4:36 p.m.
On 06/17/2012 03:50 PM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 03/19/2012 03:07 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:04:47PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
>> On 02/29/2012 08:06 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>> Let us know if you need further assistance..
>>> If you have that python script working for LOCALFS, I'd suggest you try
>>> making it work for SHAREDFS too.
>>>
>>>
>> I was able to use the VDSM_Standalone example, and modify it to use
>> SHAREDFS
>> and export glusterfs as a DATA_DOMAIN and invoke VM backed by
>> gluster storage.
>>
>> I edited http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Vdsm_Standalone (scroll below)&
>> added it as
>> a SHAREDFS example.
> Thanks! It is great news that all you need is O_DIRECT in fuse, and that
> Vdsm's SHAREDFS interface works as it is for gluster.
>
> Regards,
> Dan.
>
Hello,
Got more questions on this, now that I am re-visiting this.
The last time i tried using SHAREDFS, i started from createStorageDomain
verb, and it works fine.
But now we have connectStorageServer verb... which i believe is the new
way of doing things ?
If i start from connectStorageServer verb to mount using SHAREDFS (
which goes via PosixFs... MountConnection flow), that won't help me
entirely here, right ?
Because it only mounts based on the dict sent, but does not do anything
with the image and metadata stuff ( which createStorageDomain flow did ).
I am wondering if its too early to start using connectStorageServer ? If
not, how can i re-write the above vdsm standalone example using
connectStorageServer instead of createStorageDomain flow ?
Will a solution via engine (i.e - create PosixFS storage domain) be good
for you?
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
8:13 a.m.
On 06/17/2012 07:06 PM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
On 06/17/2012 03:50 PM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 03:07 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:04:47PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
>>> On 02/29/2012 08:06 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>>> Let us know if you need further assistance..
>>>> If you have that python script working for LOCALFS, I'd suggest you
try
>>>> making it work for SHAREDFS too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I was able to use the VDSM_Standalone example, and modify it to use
>>> SHAREDFS
>>> and export glusterfs as a DATA_DOMAIN and invoke VM backed by
>>> gluster storage.
>>>
>>> I edited http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Vdsm_Standalone (scroll below)&
>>> added it as
>>> a SHAREDFS example.
>> Thanks! It is great news that all you need is O_DIRECT in fuse, and that
>> Vdsm's SHAREDFS interface works as it is for gluster.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dan.
>>
> Hello,
> Got more questions on this, now that I am re-visiting this.
> The last time i tried using SHAREDFS, i started from createStorageDomain
> verb, and it works fine.
>
> But now we have connectStorageServer verb... which i believe is the new
> way of doing things ?
> If i start from connectStorageServer verb to mount using SHAREDFS (
> which goes via PosixFs... MountConnection flow), that won't help me
> entirely here, right ?
> Because it only mounts based on the dict sent, but does not do anything
> with the image and metadata stuff ( which createStorageDomain flow did ).
>
> I am wondering if its too early to start using connectStorageServer ? If
> not, how can i re-write the above vdsm standalone example using
> connectStorageServer instead of createStorageDomain flow ?
Will a solution via engine (i.e - create PosixFS storage domain) be good
for you?
Well, no. I kind of mis-interpreted the problem. My Q stands canceled.
The right way indeed is to use createStorageServer followed by
createStorageDomain, which i was confused initially a bit, but now its
cleared.
8:26 p.m.
New subject: [Users] [vdsm] How to configure sharedFS ?
On 06/17/2012 06:20 PM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
Hello,
Got more questions on this, now that I am re-visiting this.
The last time i tried using SHAREDFS, i started from
createStorageDomain verb, and it works fine.
But now we have connectStorageServer verb... which i believe is the
new way of doing things ?
If i start from connectStorageServer verb to mount using SHAREDFS (
which goes via PosixFs... MountConnection flow), that won't help me
entirely here, right ?
Because it only mounts based on the dict sent, but does not do
anything with the image and metadata stuff ( which createStorageDomain
flow did ).
I am wondering if its too early to start using connectStorageServer ?
If not, how can i re-write the above vdsm standalone example using
connectStorageServer instead of createStorageDomain flow ?
'Guess i got confused.. the standalone example does use
connectStorageServer followed by createStorageDomain.
Scratch the question .. my bad..
4539
days inactive
4656
days old
23 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Ayal Baron -
Dan Kenigsberg -
Deepak C Shetty -
Itamar Heim -
Michael Pasternak -
Yair Zaslavsky