11:58 a.m.
Hello,
are there any plans to make something similar to this one that was for
f18 --> f19 and ovirt 3.2 --> 3.3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009335
More in general, are there right now particular bugzilla opened and
addressed to enable f20? Or particular blockers that I don't see in
general (perhaps JBoss version?)
Or do we have to retain that for the future only RHEL/CentOS OS will
be addressed (together with the node isos)?
Thaks,
Gianluca
12:29 p.m.
Il 14/04/2014 10:58, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
Hello,
are there any plans to make something similar to this one that was for
f18 --> f19 and ovirt 3.2 --> 3.3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009335
We'll prepare that once we're able to support a clean install on F20.
More in general, are there right now particular bugzilla opened and
addressed to enable f20? Or particular blockers that I don't see in
general (perhaps JBoss version?)
Sure: Bug 1060198 - [RFE] add support for Fedora 20
Or do we have to retain that for the future only RHEL/CentOS OS
will
be addressed (together with the node isos)?
Fedora 20 is quite different from Fedora 19. I guess that once we'll be able to
support it as clean install the safest path will be backup / export
from F19; clean F20 install, restore / import into F20.
Thaks,
Gianluca
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
11:22 p.m.
On 04/14/2014 05:29 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 14/04/2014 10:58, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
> Hello,
> are there any plans to make something similar to this one that was for
> f18 --> f19 and ovirt 3.2 --> 3.3
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009335
We'll prepare that once we're able to support a clean install on F20.
> More in general, are there right now particular bugzilla opened and
> addressed to enable f20? Or particular blockers that I don't see in
> general (perhaps JBoss version?)
Sure: Bug 1060198 - [RFE] add support for Fedora 20
> Or do we have to retain that for the future only RHEL/CentOS OS will
> be addressed (together with the node isos)?
Fedora 20 is quite different from Fedora 19. I guess that once we'll be able to
support it as clean install the safest path will be backup / export
from F19; clean F20 install, restore / import into F20.
TBH, maybe we should focus on F21 and skip F20 since its 6 months since
F20 GA'd.
wait, F21 is only due october - seems they changed their life cycle from
the previous 6 months cycle.
hmmm, we should consider which target makes more sense considering the
effort each version takes us.
>
> Thaks,
> Gianluca
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
11:29 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
To: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>, "Gianluca Cecchi"
<gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com>, "users"
<users(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 11:22:12 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Bugzilla to migrate from f19 to f20 and newer release of oVirt
possible?
On 04/14/2014 05:29 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il 14/04/2014 10:58, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
>> Hello,
>> are there any plans to make something similar to this one that was for
>> f18 --> f19 and ovirt 3.2 --> 3.3
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009335
>
> We'll prepare that once we're able to support a clean install on F20.
>
>> More in general, are there right now particular bugzilla opened and
>> addressed to enable f20? Or particular blockers that I don't see in
>> general (perhaps JBoss version?)
>
> Sure: Bug 1060198 - [RFE] add support for Fedora 20
>
>> Or do we have to retain that for the future only RHEL/CentOS OS will
>> be addressed (together with the node isos)?
>
> Fedora 20 is quite different from Fedora 19. I guess that once we'll be
> able to support it as clean install the safest path will be backup /
> export
> from F19; clean F20 install, restore / import into F20.
TBH, maybe we should focus on F21 and skip F20 since its 6 months since
F20 GA'd.
wait, F21 is only due october - seems they changed their life cycle from
the previous 6 months cycle.
hmmm, we should consider which target makes more sense considering the
effort each version takes us.
The only real issue is jboss, as the log collector is not actually used and should be made
completely optional.
The fact that fedora's jboss is incompatible with us should not make us not provide
users service if they like by downloading and extracting upstream jboss to /opt or
similar.
I do not see any reason to force users into fedora-19 only because something that is easy
to workaround.
>
>>
>> Thaks,
>> Gianluca
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
3667
days inactive
3694
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alon Bar-Lev -
Gianluca Cecchi -
Itamar Heim -
Sandro Bonazzola