On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 10:48 +0800, Mark Wu wrote:
On 03/18/2014 10:55 PM, Christy Perez wrote:
> Adding a 15 second timeout instead of two seconds. This makes kimchi
> more robust in the face of NFS issues such as this one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christy Perez <christy(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> src/kimchi/model/libvirtstoragepool.py | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/kimchi/model/libvirtstoragepool.py
b/src/kimchi/model/libvirtstoragepool.py
> index b8f3d42..35666dc 100644
> --- a/src/kimchi/model/libvirtstoragepool.py
> +++ b/src/kimchi/model/libvirtstoragepool.py
> @@ -91,10 +91,9 @@ class NetfsPoolDef(StoragePoolDef):
> export_path, mnt_point]
> umount_cmd = ["umount", "-f", export_path]
> mounted = False
> - # 2 seconds looks like a reasonable time to wait for a refresh
> - # in the UI and enough time to verify that the NFS server
> - # is down.
> - cmd_timeout = 2
> + # Due to an NFS bug, NFSv4 exports may take 10-15 seconds to mount
> + # the first time.
Maybe you could add the info of related bug here too, such as
"rhbz#1023059". Anyway, 2s seems a little bit strict for nfs mount.
Okay
if I put that into the commit message instead? Or would you rather
it be in the comment?
> + cmd_timeout = 15
>
> with RollbackContext() as rollback:
> rollback.prependDefer(os.rmdir, mnt_point)
Reviewed-by: Mark Wu<wudxw(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>