[JIRA] (OVIRT-920) Add a standard-CI job and button "build-scratch-artifacts"
by eyal edri [Administrator] (oVirt JIRA)
[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-920?page=com.atlassian.jira... ]
eyal edri [Administrator] updated OVIRT-920:
--------------------------------------------
Epic Link: OVIRT-400
> Add a standard-CI job and button "build-scratch-artifacts"
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-920
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-920
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: By-EMAIL
> Reporter: Yedidyah Bar David
> Assignee: infra
>
> Hi,
> I think it will be useful to have an option to very easily (such as
> pressing a button in gerrit) to do a full build of a project,
> similarly to current build-artifacts, but for a pending patch - so it
> will not be collected by any publisher, and will keep its artifacts
> for a short time (say, 2 days).
> This will allow to use these artifacts for manual tests, perhaps
> longer than check-patch, in case a developer wants to do them.
> --
> Didi
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v1000.620.0#100023)
7 years, 11 months
[JIRA] (OVIRT-920) Add a standard-CI job and button "build-scratch-artifacts"
by eyal edri [Administrator] (oVirt JIRA)
[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-920?page=com.atlassian.jira... ]
eyal edri [Administrator] updated OVIRT-920:
--------------------------------------------
Epic Link: OVIRT-400
> Add a standard-CI job and button "build-scratch-artifacts"
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-920
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-920
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: By-EMAIL
> Reporter: Yedidyah Bar David
> Assignee: infra
>
> Hi,
> I think it will be useful to have an option to very easily (such as
> pressing a button in gerrit) to do a full build of a project,
> similarly to current build-artifacts, but for a pending patch - so it
> will not be collected by any publisher, and will keep its artifacts
> for a short time (say, 2 days).
> This will allow to use these artifacts for manual tests, perhaps
> longer than check-patch, in case a developer wants to do them.
> --
> Didi
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v1000.620.0#100023)
7 years, 11 months
[JIRA] (OVIRT-922) Add new project to standard ci from github
by eyal edri [Administrator] (oVirt JIRA)
[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-922?page=com.atlassian.jira... ]
eyal edri [Administrator] updated OVIRT-922:
--------------------------------------------
Epic Link: OVIRT-400
> Add new project to standard ci from github
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-922
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-922
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Jenkins
> Reporter: Ondra Machacek
> Assignee: infra
>
> I would like to request a jenkins machine for Ansible modules tests.
> Those tests needs host with nested virtualization as it will create a few virtual machines for tests.
> Actually, what I would need is similar machine which OST are using, but with preinstalled vagrant and ansible.
> Then I would need some possibility to run this job from a hook from github, when new commit is pushed.
> The tests are described here for an idea:
> https://github.com/machacekondra/ovirt-tests
> Would that be possible?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v1000.620.0#100023)
7 years, 11 months
[JIRA] (OVIRT-919) Fwd: CI slaves extremely slow - overloaded slaves?
by eyal edri [Administrator] (oVirt JIRA)
[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-919?page=com.atlassian.jira... ]
eyal edri [Administrator] updated OVIRT-919:
--------------------------------------------
Epic Link: OVIRT-403
> Fwd: CI slaves extremely slow - overloaded slaves?
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-919
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-919
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: By-EMAIL
> Components: Jenkins
> Reporter: Barak Korren
> Assignee: infra
> Labels: hypervisors, performance, slaves, standard-ci
>
> From: Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
> Date: 7 December 2016 at 21:33
> Subject: CI slaves extremely slow - overloaded slaves?
> To: infra <infra(a)ovirt.org>, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com>, Dan
> Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com>
> Hi all,
> In the last weeks we see more and more test failures due to timeouts in the CI.
> For example:
> 17:19:49 ======================================================================
> 17:19:49 FAIL: test_scale (storage_filesd_test.GetAllVolumesTests)
> 17:19:49 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 17:19:49 Traceback (most recent call last):
> 17:19:49 File
> "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-fc24-x86_64/vdsm/tests/storage_filesd_test.py",
> line 165, in test_scale
> 17:19:49 self.assertTrue(elapsed < 1.0, "Elapsed time: %f seconds"
> % elapsed)
> 17:19:49 AssertionError: Elapsed time: 1.105877 seconds
> 17:19:49 -------------------- >> begin captured stdout << ---------------------
> 17:19:49 1.105877 seconds
> This test runs in 0.048 seconds on my laptop:
> $ ./run_tests_local.sh storage_filesd_test.py -s
> nose.config: INFO: Ignoring files matching ['^\\.', '^_', '^setup\\.py$']
> storage_filesd_test.GetAllVolumesTests
> test_no_templates OK
> test_no_volumes OK
> test_scale 0.047932 seconds
> OK
> test_with_template OK
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 4 tests in 0.189s
> It seems that we are overloading the CI slaves. We should not use nested kvm
> for the CI, such vms are much slower then regular vms, and we probably run
> too many vms per cpu.
> We can disable such tests in the CI, but we do want to know when there is
> a regression in this code. Before it was fixed, the same test took 9 seconds
> on my laptop. We need fast machines in the CI for this.
> Nir
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v1000.620.0#100023)
7 years, 11 months
[JIRA] (OVIRT-919) Fwd: CI slaves extremely slow - overloaded slaves?
by eyal edri [Administrator] (oVirt JIRA)
[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-919?page=com.atlassian.jira... ]
eyal edri [Administrator] reassigned OVIRT-919:
-----------------------------------------------
Assignee: Evgheni Dereveanchin (was: infra)
Epic Link: OVIRT-403
> Fwd: CI slaves extremely slow - overloaded slaves?
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-919
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-919
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: By-EMAIL
> Components: Jenkins
> Reporter: Barak Korren
> Assignee: Evgheni Dereveanchin
> Labels: hypervisors, performance, slaves, standard-ci
>
> From: Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
> Date: 7 December 2016 at 21:33
> Subject: CI slaves extremely slow - overloaded slaves?
> To: infra <infra(a)ovirt.org>, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com>, Dan
> Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com>
> Hi all,
> In the last weeks we see more and more test failures due to timeouts in the CI.
> For example:
> 17:19:49 ======================================================================
> 17:19:49 FAIL: test_scale (storage_filesd_test.GetAllVolumesTests)
> 17:19:49 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 17:19:49 Traceback (most recent call last):
> 17:19:49 File
> "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-fc24-x86_64/vdsm/tests/storage_filesd_test.py",
> line 165, in test_scale
> 17:19:49 self.assertTrue(elapsed < 1.0, "Elapsed time: %f seconds"
> % elapsed)
> 17:19:49 AssertionError: Elapsed time: 1.105877 seconds
> 17:19:49 -------------------- >> begin captured stdout << ---------------------
> 17:19:49 1.105877 seconds
> This test runs in 0.048 seconds on my laptop:
> $ ./run_tests_local.sh storage_filesd_test.py -s
> nose.config: INFO: Ignoring files matching ['^\\.', '^_', '^setup\\.py$']
> storage_filesd_test.GetAllVolumesTests
> test_no_templates OK
> test_no_volumes OK
> test_scale 0.047932 seconds
> OK
> test_with_template OK
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 4 tests in 0.189s
> It seems that we are overloading the CI slaves. We should not use nested kvm
> for the CI, such vms are much slower then regular vms, and we probably run
> too many vms per cpu.
> We can disable such tests in the CI, but we do want to know when there is
> a regression in this code. Before it was fixed, the same test took 9 seconds
> on my laptop. We need fast machines in the CI for this.
> Nir
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v1000.620.0#100023)
7 years, 11 months