[JIRA] (OVIRT-1500) CI on ovirt-engine patch succeeded, but didn't mark CI=+1 on gerrit
by eedri (oVirt JIRA)
[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1500?page=com.atlassian.jir... ]
eedri updated OVIRT-1500:
-------------------------
Priority: Low (was: Medium)
> CI on ovirt-engine patch succeeded, but didn't mark CI=+1 on gerrit
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-1500
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1500
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Gerrit/git, oVirt CI
> Reporter: Allon Mureinik
> Assignee: infra
> Priority: Low
>
> In my recent engine patch https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/78911 the CI passed, but was not marked as so in gerrit.
> Looking through gerrit's history, here's what I *think* is going on:
> 08:41 - patchset #1 is submitted
> 08:41 - CI (check-patch) starts for both EL7 and fc25
> _At this point I noticed a typo in the commit method. I fixed it and posted patchset #2_
> 08:42 - patchset #2 is submitted
> _CI was never triggered for patchset #2. Is this because the only difference between it and patchset #1 is the commit message?_
> 09:15 - CI for patchset #1 completes, and marks *patchset #1* with CI=+1. This is not inherited to patchset #2 for some reason.
> Expected behavior:
> If CI for patchset #1 passed and the only difference is the commit message (not the parent commit and not the content), I'd expect the CI score to be inherited.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v1000.1092.1#100053)
7 years, 4 months
[JIRA] (OVIRT-1500) CI on ovirt-engine patch succeeded, but didn't mark CI=+1 on gerrit
by eedri (oVirt JIRA)
[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1500?page=com.atlassian.jir... ]
eedri commented on OVIRT-1500:
------------------------------
I'll lower priority and keep it for a while in case it pops again, if its not common then we will probably close it.
Thanks for reporting anyway!
> CI on ovirt-engine patch succeeded, but didn't mark CI=+1 on gerrit
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-1500
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1500
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Gerrit/git, oVirt CI
> Reporter: Allon Mureinik
> Assignee: infra
>
> In my recent engine patch https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/78911 the CI passed, but was not marked as so in gerrit.
> Looking through gerrit's history, here's what I *think* is going on:
> 08:41 - patchset #1 is submitted
> 08:41 - CI (check-patch) starts for both EL7 and fc25
> _At this point I noticed a typo in the commit method. I fixed it and posted patchset #2_
> 08:42 - patchset #2 is submitted
> _CI was never triggered for patchset #2. Is this because the only difference between it and patchset #1 is the commit message?_
> 09:15 - CI for patchset #1 completes, and marks *patchset #1* with CI=+1. This is not inherited to patchset #2 for some reason.
> Expected behavior:
> If CI for patchset #1 passed and the only difference is the commit message (not the parent commit and not the content), I'd expect the CI score to be inherited.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v1000.1092.1#100053)
7 years, 4 months
[JIRA] (OVIRT-1076) Create jobs to link Jira to Gerrit
by eedri (oVirt JIRA)
[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1076?page=com.atlassian.jir... ]
eedri reassigned OVIRT-1076:
----------------------------
Assignee: Dafna Ron (was: infra)
This can be a cool coding task to try out.
It will require learning a bit the JIRA API and also to get familiar with the Gerrit python API we already use on other jobs.
> Create jobs to link Jira to Gerrit
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-1076
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1076
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Gerrit/git
> Reporter: Barak Korren
> Assignee: Dafna Ron
>
> Jira probably has an API, so we can make jobs that will find Gerrit patches with 'Jira-Ticket' header and link that to the matching Jira ticket.
> We can also perhaps make the link show the patch status and be updated as the patch status changes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v1000.1092.1#100053)
7 years, 4 months