On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 6:35 PM Yuval Turgeman <yturgema(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Ok, regarding the tar issue, there's another solution - since
commons-compress hard coded the blocking factor to 1, while the default in
tar is 20, we could continue creating the tar as we do today, but add a
bunch of zeros to the end of the tarball.
[yturgema@piggie ~/aa]$ ls -l ovirt-host-deploy_fc28.tar
-rw-r--r--. 1 yturgema yturgema 2166272 Sep 2 17:03
ovirt-host-deploy_fc28.tar
[yturgema@piggie ~/aa]$ python -c "print 10240-2166272%10240"
4608
[yturgema@piggie ~/aa]$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/stdout bs=4608 count=1 |
cat ovirt-host-deploy_fc28.tar - > new_host_deploy.tar
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
4608 bytes (4.6 kB, 4.5 KiB) copied, 0.000373488 s, 12.3 MB/s
[yturgema@piggie ~/aa]$ ls -l new_host_deploy.tar
-rw-rw-r--. 1 yturgema yturgema 2170880 Sep 17 18:16 new_host_deploy.tar
This would solve the problem, and not break el7, if this solution is
acceptable, I can send a patch.
This will probably work, but if you ask me, is too ugly. If we want to go
this path, we probably
have to find a reliable way to find out the blocking factor, or we risk
another failure in the
future.
What about simply giving up on all of this and calling the external 'tar'
utility also for
creating the archive, instead of using Java?
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 6:02 PM, Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, 16:25 Ravi Shankar Nori, <rnori(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> host-deploy is still broken on master fc28
>>
>
> Yes, there are multiple issues on FC28, but the question is if this fixed
> OST on CentOS?
>
>
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Yuval Turgeman <yturgema(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm pretty sure I verified this on el7 as well, i'll check again,
but
>>> thinking about it, tar will stop when it gets to the first empty block, so
>>> if the record size on the engine's side is large and the end is filled
with
>>> zeros, -b1 will make it stop at the first empty block so the next read on
>>> the host's side would get the trailing zeros which is what otopi reads.
>>> Btw, it could be a problem with deployed el7 systems as well, if for
>>> any reason the default on the host is set to something that is more than 20
>>> blocks (can be set with export TAR_BLOCKING_FACTOR for the root account on
>>> the host side).
>>> It's ok to revert the patch to fix the regression, but I don't see
any
>>> other way other than -b1... perhaps add a `cat -` after to just read until
>>> EOF or something, or have otopi strip the input.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Galit Rosenthal <grosenth(a)redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Didi,
>>>>
>>>> Is this what you are looking for
>>>>
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2259
>>>> ?
>>>> Galit
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 1:54 PM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think that in ovirt-engine we currently only build to centos.
>>>>> since we have not had an engine build for 2 weeks (on master) I
think
>>>>> we should merge and worry about fc28 once it would be relevant.
>>>>>
>>>>> the failure we have now could be another regression missed since the
>>>>> project has been broken for two weeks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Dafna
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:30 AM Yedidyah Bar David
<didi(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:49 AM Dafna Ron
<dron(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Didi, Marin, any update on the patch?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes - it passed. Actually failed, but only after host-deploy:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/oVirt%20system%20tests/job/ovirt-system-te...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd rather not merge it as-is, because it will break fedora.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If someone can have a look at the code generating the tar file,
and
>>>>>> can see if
>>>>>> it's easy to make it work well for both centos and fedora,
perhaps
>>>>>> by explicitly
>>>>>> setting all relevant params to some reasonable values, great.
>>>>>> Otherwise, I guess
>>>>>> we can merge for now, as fedora is still not supported anyway.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 11:09 AM Yedidyah Bar David <
>>>>>> didi(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 12:53 PM Yedidyah Bar David
<
>>>>>> didi(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 6:06 PM Martin Perina <
>>>>>> mperina(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Ravi Shankar
Nori <
>>>>>> rnori(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >> I see the same errors on my dev env. From
the logs attached
>>>>>> by Andrej the response received by otopi has a bunch of null
chars before
>>>>>> the actual response CONFIRM DEPLOY_PROCEED=yes
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >> 2018-09-14 15:49:23,018+0200 DEBUG
>>>>>> otopi.plugins.otopi.dialog.machine dialog.__logString:204
DIALOG:SEND
>>>>>> ### Response is CONFIRM DEPLOY_PROCEED=yes|no or ABORT
DEPLOY_PROCEED
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >> ^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@CONFIRM
DEPLOY_PROCEED=yes
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > Didi/Sandro, could you please take a look?
Below error seems
>>>>>> like some issue in otopi, where an error is raised when handling
binary
>>>>>> input:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Not sure the issue is "binary input" in
general, but simply
>>>>>> illegal
>>>>>> >> > input. The prompt expects, as it says, one of these
3 replies:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > CONFIRM DEPLOY_PROCEED=yes
>>>>>> >> > CONFIRM DEPLOY_PROCEED=no
>>>>>> >> > ABORT DEPLOY_PROCEED
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Instead, judging from the file supplied by Andrej,
it gets from
>>>>>> the engine:
>>>>>> >> > <7169 null bytes>CONFIRM DEPLOY_PROCEED=yes
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > So either the engine now sends, for some reason,
7169 null
>>>>>> bytes, in
>>>>>> >> > this response, or there is some low-level change
causing this
>>>>>> to be
>>>>>> >> > eventually supplied to otopi - a change in
apache-sshd,
>>>>>> openssh, some
>>>>>> >> > library, the kernel, no idea.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Well, thinking a bit, I have a wild guess: Perhaps
it's related
>>>>>> to the
>>>>>> >> > patch introduced recently to change the tar
blocking?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/94357
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I am leaving soon, perhaps someone can try the manual
job with the
>>>>>> >> result of the check-patch job for above patch, to see if
it fixes.
>>>>>> >> Otherwise I'll do this tomorrow.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > 2018-09-14 15:49:23,032+0200 DEBUG
otopi.context
>>>>>> context._executeMethod:143 method exception
>>>>>> >> > > Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>> >> > > File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/otopi/context.py",
>>>>>> line 133, in _executeMethod
>>>>>> >> > > method['method']()
>>>>>> >> > > File
>>>>>>
"/tmp/ovirt-O6CfS4aUHI/otopi-plugins/ovirt-host-deploy/core/misc.py", line
>>>>>> 87, in _confirm
>>>>>> >> > > prompt=True,
>>>>>> >> > > File
>>>>>>
"/tmp/ovirt-O6CfS4aUHI/otopi-plugins/otopi/dialog/machine.py", line 478, in
>>>>>> confirm
>>>>>> >> > > code=opcode,
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Dafna
Ron <dron(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > >>>
>>>>>> >> > >>> if you run it with mock you would
remove any environmental
>>>>>> conditions that can effect the outcome so I recommend using mock
>>>>>> >> > >>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>
>>>>>> >> > >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:32 PM,
Martin Perina <
>>>>>> mperina(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > >>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:49 PM,
Dafna Ron <
>>>>>> dron(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>> did you use mock to
reproduce?
>>>>>> >> > >>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>> No, just run_suite under myself
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:39
PM, Martin Perina <
>>>>>> mperina(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> the problem is that we
haven't fetched the temporary
>>>>>> host-deploy log from /tmp directory, so we don't know which
string that
>>>>>> host-deploy process sent to engine is causing that issue. I tried
to
>>>>>> reproduce on my local machine, but I was unable to reproduce it,
>>>>>> 002_bootstrap phase finished successfully (other phases are still
running).
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> So if anyone is able to
reproduce, please try to fetch
>>>>>> host-deploy log from /tmp directory after the error is raised and
share it.
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Martin
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at
1:52 PM, Dafna Ron <
>>>>>> dron(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Full logs can be found
here:
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>>>>>
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/Change%20queue%20jobs/job/ovirt-master_cha...
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018
at 12:48 PM, Dafna Ron <
>>>>>> dron(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> The previous
regression was resolved and we now have a
>>>>>> new regression.
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> I don't think
that the reported change is related so
>>>>>> can someone from ovirt-engine take a look?
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> The failure is add
host on the upgrade suite.
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Please note that
we have not had an engine-ovirt build
>>>>>> for over 10 days due to several consecutive regressions and I
would ask you
>>>>>> to stop merging until we can stabilize the project and have a new
package
>>>>>> of engine.
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> error:
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> 2018-09-14
05:51:07,670-04 INFO
>>>>>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.uutils.ssh.SSHDialog]
>>>>>> (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1) [5c91fcbd] SSH execute
>>>>>> 'root@lago-upgrade-from-release-suite-master-host-0'
'umask 0077;
>>>>>> MYTMP="$(TMPDIR="${OVIRT_TMPDIR}" mktemp -d -t
ovirt-XXXXXXXXXX)"; trap
>>>>>> "chmod -R u+rwX \"${MYTMP}\" > /dev/null
2>&1; rm -fr \"${MYTMP}\" >
>>>>>> /dev/null 2>&1" 0; tar -b1 --warning=no-timestamp -C
"${MYTMP}" -x &&
>>>>>> "${MYTMP}"/ovirt-host-deploy
DIALOG/dialect=str:machine
>>>>>> DIALOG/customization=bool:True'
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> 2018-09-14
05:51:08,550-04 INFO
>>>>>>
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector]
>>>>>> (VdsDeploy) [5c91fcbd] EVENT_ID: VDS_INSTALL_IN_PROGRESS(509),
Installing
>>>>>> Host lago-upgrade-from-release-suite-master-host-0. Stage:
Initializing.
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> 2018-09-14
05:51:08,565-04 INFO
>>>>>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.transaction.TransactionSupport]
(VdsDeploy)
>>>>>> [5c91fcbd] transaction rolled back
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> 2018-09-14
05:51:08,574-04 ERROR
>>>>>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.hostdeploy.VdsDeployBase] (VdsDeploy)
[5c91fcbd]
>>>>>> Error during deploy dialog
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> 2018-09-14
05:51:08,578-04 ERROR
>>>>>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.hostdeploy.VdsDeployBase]
>>>>>> (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1) [5c91fcbd] Error during
host
>>>>>> lago-upgrade-from-release-suite-master-host-0 install
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> 2018-09-14
05:51:08,586-04 ERROR
>>>>>>
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector]
>>>>>> (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1) [5c91fcbd] EVENT_ID:
>>>>>> VDS_INSTALL_IN_PROGRESS_ERROR(511), An error has occurred during
>>>>>> installation of Host
lago-upgrade-from-release-suite-master-host-0:
>>>>>> CallableStatementCallback; SQL [{call insertauditlog(?, ?, ?, ?,
?, ?, ?,
>>>>>> ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?,
?, ?, ?,
>>>>>> ?, ?)}ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8":
0x00; nested
>>>>>> exception is org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: invalid
byte
>>>>>> sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0x00.
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> 2018-09-14
05:51:08,586-04 ERROR
>>>>>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.hostdeploy.VdsDeployBase]
>>>>>> (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1) [5c91fcbd] Error during
host
>>>>>> lago-upgrade-from-release-suite-master-host-0 install, preferring
first
>>>>>> exception: CallableStatementCallback; SQL [{call
insertauditlog(?, ?, ?, ?,
>>>>>> ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?,
?, ?, ?,
>>>>>> ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)}ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding
"UTF8": 0x00;
>>>>>> nested exception is org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR:
invalid byte
>>>>>> sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0x00
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> 2018-09-14
05:51:08,586-04 ERROR
>>>>>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.hostdeploy.InstallVdsInternalCommand]
>>>>>> (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1) [5c91fcbd] Host
installation
>>>>>> failed for host 'e475e93a-63b3-4573-b242-162c2ed864f0',
>>>>>> 'lago-upgrade-from-release-suite-master-host-0':
CallableStatementCallback;
>>>>>> SQL [{call insertauditlog(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?,
?, ?, ?,
>>>>>> ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)}ERROR:
invalid byte
>>>>>> sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0x00; nested exception
is
>>>>>> org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: invalid byte sequence
for
>>>>>> encoding "UTF8": 0x00
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> 2018-09-14
05:51:08,615-04 INFO
>>>>>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.SetVdsStatusVDSCommand]
>>>>>> (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1) [5c91fcbd] START,
>>>>>> SetVdsStatusVDSCommand(HostName =
>>>>>> lago-upgrade-from-release-suite-master-host-0,
>>>>>>
SetVdsStatusVDSCommandParameters:{hostId='e475e93a-63b3-4573-b242-162c2ed864f0',
>>>>>> status='InstallFailed',
nonOperationalReason='NONE',
>>>>>> stopSpmFailureLogged='false',
maintenanceReason='null'}), log id: 146cdc08
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> 2018-09-14
05:51:08,626-04 INFO
>>>>>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.SetVdsStatusVDSCommand]
>>>>>> (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1) [5c91fcbd] FINISH,
>>>>>> SetVdsStatusVDSCommand, return: , log id: 146cdc08
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> 2018-09-14
05:51:08,639-04 ERROR
>>>>>>
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector]
>>>>>> (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1) [5c91fcbd] EVENT_ID:
>>>>>> VDS_INSTALL_FAILED(505), Host
lago-upgrade-from-release-suite-master-host-0
>>>>>> installation failed. CallableStatementCallback; SQL [{call
>>>>>> insertauditlog(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?,
?, ?, ?,
>>>>>> ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)}ERROR: invalid byte
sequence for
>>>>>> encoding "UTF8": 0x00; nested exception is
>>>>>> org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: invalid byte sequence
for
>>>>>> encoding "UTF8": 0x00.
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> 2018-09-14
05:51:08,652-04 INFO
>>>>>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.hostdeploy.InstallVdsInternalCommand]
>>>>>> (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1) [5c91fcbd] Lock freed
to object
>>>>>>
'EngineLock:{exclusiveLocks='[e475e93a-63b3-4573-b242-162c2ed864f0=VDS]',
>>>>>> sharedLocks=''}'
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> 2018-09-14
05:51:37,996-04 INFO
>>>>>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.quota.QuotaManager]
>>>>>> (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-44) [] Quota
Cache updated.
>>>>>> (19 msec)
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> (END)
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Dafna
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> --
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Martin Perina
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Associate Manager,
Software Engineering
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>> --
>>>>>> >> > >>>> Martin Perina
>>>>>> >> > >>>> Associate Manager, Software
Engineering
>>>>>> >> > >>>> Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
>>>>>> >> > >>>
>>>>>> >> > >>>
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > --
>>>>>> >> > > Martin Perina
>>>>>> >> > > Associate Manager, Software Engineering
>>>>>> >> > > Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > --
>>>>>> >> > Didi
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>> >> Didi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Didi
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Infra mailing list -- infra(a)ovirt.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to infra-leave(a)ovirt.org
>>>>> Privacy Statement:
https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
>>>>>
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
>>>>> List Archives:
>>>>>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/infra@ovirt.org/message/CG2IYPXSSEF...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> GALIT ROSENTHAL
>>>>
>>>> SOFTWARE ENGINEER
>>>>
>>>> Red Hat
>>>>
>>>> <
https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>>
>>>> galit(a)gmail.com T: 972-9-7692230
>>>> <
https://red.ht/sig>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Infra mailing list -- infra(a)ovirt.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to infra-leave(a)ovirt.org
>>> Privacy Statement:
https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
>>>
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
>>> List Archives:
>>>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/infra@ovirt.org/message/QMRM2INTCRD...
>>>
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list -- infra(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infra-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement:
https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/infra@ovirt.org/message/7MG4ZPPXOVM...