[JIRA] (OST-99) new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite -- need multiple firefoxes and chromium

Sunday, 11 March 2018

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1520771999-12112-110
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

     [
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OST-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.pl...
]

Greg Sheremeta updated OST-99:
------------------------------
    Description: 
I'm writing a suite that does headless UI testing. One goal is to open headless
firefox and actually open the UI, perform a login, make sure things look good, make sure
there are no ui.log errors, etc. I'll also eventually add chromium, which can run
headless now too.

The suite requires several firefox versions to be installed on the test machine, along
with chromium. There are also some binary components required, geckodriver and
chromedriver. These are not packaged.

Ideally the browsers can be installed to /opt/firefox55, /opt/firefox56, /opt/chromium62,
etc. on the machine running the suite. So I think it makes sense to maintain a custom rpm
with all of this.

Where can this rpm live? What is a reliable way to do this? (I know we want to avoid
copr.)

...

Update for posterity (Mar 11 2018): we decided in the comments below to use [Selenium
Grid|https://www.seleniumhq.org/docs/07_selenium_grid.jsp] and
[docker-compose|https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/docker-selenium/wiki/Getting...].
Since Selenium Grid provides preconfigured containers, we're not maintaining anything
other than docker-compose yaml files. No need to worry about packaging browsers
ourselves.

  was:
I'm writing a suite that does headless UI testing. One goal is to open headless
firefox and actually open the UI, perform a login, make sure things look good, make sure
there are no ui.log errors, etc. I'll also eventually add chromium, which can run
headless now too.

The suite requires several firefox versions to be installed on the test machine, along
with chromium. There are also some binary components required, geckodriver and
chromedriver. These are not packaged.

Ideally the browsers can be installed to /opt/firefox55, /opt/firefox56, /opt/chromium62,
etc. on the machine running the suite. So I think it makes sense to maintain a custom rpm
with all of this.

Where can this rpm live? What is a reliable way to do this? (I know we want to avoid
copr.)

...
 new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite -- need multiple firefoxes and
chromium
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: OST-99
                 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OST-99
             Project: oVirt system tests
          Issue Type: Improvement
            Reporter: Greg Sheremeta
            Assignee: infra

--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100082)

------------=_1520771999-12112-110
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html><body>
<pre>[
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OST-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.pl...
]</pre>
<h3>Greg Sheremeta updated OST-99:</h3>
<pre>Description:</pre>
<p>I'm writing a suite that does headless UI testing. One goal is to open
headless firefox and actually open the UI, perform a login, make sure things look good,
make sure there are no ui.log errors, etc. I'll also eventually add chromium, which
can run headless now too.</p>
<p>The suite requires several firefox versions to be installed on the test machine,
along with chromium. There are also some binary components required, geckodriver and
chromedriver. These are not packaged.</p>
<p>Ideally the browsers can be installed to /opt/firefox55, /opt/firefox56,
/opt/chromium62, etc. on the machine running the suite. So I think it makes sense to
maintain a custom rpm with all of this.</p>
<p>Where can this rpm live? What is a reliable way to do this? (I know we want to
avoid copr.)</p>
<p>&hellip;</p>
<p>Update for posterity (Mar 11 2018): we decided in the comments below to use
[Selenium Grid|<a
href="https://www.seleniumhq.org/docs/07_selenium_grid.jsp">...>]
and [docker-compose|<a
href="https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/docker-selenium/wiki/Getting-Sta...>].
Since Selenium Grid provides preconfigured containers, we're not maintaining anything
other than docker-compose yaml files. No need to worry about packaging browsers
ourselves.</p>
<pre>was:</pre>
<p>I'm writing a suite that does headless UI testing. One goal is to open
headless firefox and actually open the UI, perform a login, make sure things look good,
make sure there are no ui.log errors, etc. I'll also eventually add chromium, which
can run headless now too.</p>
<p>The suite requires several firefox versions to be installed on the test machine,
along with chromium. There are also some binary components required, geckodriver and
chromedriver. These are not packaged.</p>
<p>Ideally the browsers can be installed to /opt/firefox55, /opt/firefox56,
/opt/chromium62, etc. on the machine running the suite. So I think it makes sense to
maintain a custom rpm with all of this.</p>
<p>Where can this rpm live? What is a reliable way to do this? (I know we want to
avoid copr.)</p>
<blockquote><h3>new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite &mdash; need
multiple firefoxes and chromium</h3>
<pre>     Key: OST-99
     URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OST-99
 Project: oVirt system tests
         Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Greg Sheremeta
Assignee: infra</pre></blockquote>
<p>&mdash; This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100082)</p>

------------=_1520771999-12112-110--

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

[JIRA] (OST-99) new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite -- need multiple firefoxes and chromium