Re: Minutes :: Infra weekly sync :: 20121126

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:11:19PM -0500, Itamar Heim wrote: > On 11/27/2012 03:31 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: >>>> i tried to follow the thread, but could discern the summary of which >>>> repos you want (separate for foreman/puppet, etc.). please summarize >>>> for me name of repos and maintainers for each. >> We need to do that, but haven't figured it out all the way, I think? >> >> At the least, I think we need: >> >> web :: (all of Infra team) + dneary, garrett, jbrooks I'm more in favor of website, but can be fine with web.

>> For Foreman/Puppet, I'm not sure yet. What I would have put in git >> before (scripts, etc.) will be RPMs for Puppet to consume. But maybe >> we need a source control for that anyway? I'd prefer puppet here, but try to keep RPMs out of it. When we need those I'd rather make a real yum repository. Maybe keep the spec files in our scripts repo or something. >> infra_scripts: (all of Infra team) How about infra-scripts? Again, minor bike shedding but I feel it's more consistent with other repositories that also use a dash. > are these the final names? Almost ;) _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra