vaporizing devel@
by Karsten 'quaid' Wade
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The devel(a)ovirt.org mailing list was intended to serve the same
purpose as arch@, and I created it initially more out of habit than
anything. Now that arch@ is the active list, we're creating confusion
with the vestigial list. There are only two members (myself, pmyers),
one post in the archives (a repeated kmestry post), so I'm going to
vaporize the list with no loss.
- --
name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Architect
team: Red Hat Community Architecture & Leadership
uri: http://communityleadershipteam.org
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org
gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFPD7QM2ZIOBq0ODEERAihoAJ9wQtKUdVlodtZWNTmjRnjNvOeiIwCg4aBm
9YkJNGMSN/bgbmQOtikI+vM=
=eMtG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
13 years
Tagline on ovirt.org does not communicate a clear and simple message
by Stefan Hajnoczi
Hi,
The tagline on ovirt.org is long and unclear:
"Complete and Comprehensive Open Source Infrastructure and Management
Virtualization Platform for the Data Center".
"Complete and Comprehensive" is almost a tautology. "Infrastructure and
Management Virtualization Platform" does not make sense, I'm not sure
what a "Management Virtualization Platform" is.
Something shorter would communicate what ovirt.org is about better.
This tagline is used in the <h2> and <title> (shortened). It's
important because this is how visitors learn what oVirt is and whether
to read more. How about shortening it to, "Complete Open Source
Virtualization Platform for the Data Center"?
Thanks to mburns on #ovirt for directing me to infra(a)ovirt.org and
board(a)ovirt.org.
Stefan
13 years
Fwd: Please test git-review RPM
by Karsten 'quaid' Wade
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Are these useful to us?
That is, are we using 'git-review' for our Gerrit instance? If so,
then, yes, packages are useful to us.
If yes, then we probably want to check for compatibility, and report
back to Pete if we get any problems.
- - Karsten
- -------- Original Message --------
Subject: Please test git-review RPM
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:15:46 -0700
From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev(a)redhat.com>
Reply-To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Dear All:
I am thinking about packaging git-review (the real one, not Facebook's),
and to that end I prepared RPMs that are to be submitted for Fedora.
Before I do that, I'd like someone verify that they work.
AFAIK both Gluster and OpenStack use Gerrit with git-review. These RPMs
come from OpenStack source, and I am very curious if they are compatible
with Gluster use, so that we can have one in Fedora.
http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.noarch.rpm
http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.src.rpm
Thanks and have a happy New Year,
- -- Pete
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFPA5Vi2ZIOBq0ODEERAqmrAJ4veOcjfLMFKvKflEyO72T5UaH+hQCeO6dL
LmgcSwfotHPNrCEY4WpPnDc=
=dHSS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
13 years
