[JENKINS] Failed to setup proejct
kubevirt_kubevirt_standard-check-pr
by jenkins@jenkins.phx.ovirt.org
Failed to run project_setup.sh for:
#3454 kubevirt [check-patch].
It probably means that docker_cleanup.py failed.
This step doesn't fail the job, but we do collect
data about such failures to find the root cause.
Infra owner, ensure that we're not running out of
disk space on openshift-kubevirt-org-xbpkf.
5 years, 10 months
Rename GitHub repo ovirt-ansible-v2v-conversion-host
by Tomáš Golembiovský
Hi,
I would like to rename the GitHub repo ovirt-ansible-v2v-conversion-host
to v2v-conversion-host. Is there a list of things I should do before
or after the operation? Will the automation still work?
Tomas
--
Tomáš Golembiovský <tgolembi(a)redhat.com>
5 years, 10 months
[JIRA] (OVIRT-2669) CI scripts try to modify unrelated bugs
by Anton Marchukov (oVirt JIRA)
[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2669?page=com.atlassian.jir... ]
Anton Marchukov commented on OVIRT-2669:
----------------------------------------
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 10:16 AM
Subject: CI scripts try to modify unrelated bugs
To: <infra-support(a)ovirt.org>
Cc: infra <infra(a)ovirt.org>, devel <devel(a)ovirt.org>, Vojtech Juranek <
vjuranek(a)redhat.com>
If a commit message mention another bug, the CI script try to add the patch
to the bug in the commit message, and change the bug to POST.
Mentioning another bug in a commit message is good practice, making it
easier to follow, and avoiding unclear forms like "bug 1000000" or
"BZ#1000000",
or even worse shortened urls like https://goo.gl/bPuFGo.
Does it make sense that we cannot link to Red Hat bugzilla like god
intended?
Here is a proof:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/97568/
gerrit-hooks
Patch Set 1:
Check Bug-Url::10000000::WARN, failed to get bug info (private bug or
bug doesn't exist
Check Product::IGNORE, not relevant for branch: master
Check TM::IGNORE, not relevant for branch: master
Check Backport::IGNORE, not relevant for branch: master
Set POST::#10000000::WARN, failed to get bug info (private bug or bug
doesn't exist)
Update Tracker::#10000000::WARN, failed to get bug info (private bug or
bug doesn't exist)
CI scripts should process urls only inside Bug-Url: tag.
Expected behavior:
Extract bug urls *only* from Bug-Url: label.
The same issue exists with Related-To: label.
This is not a new bug. I reported it few years ago but for some reason the
issue
was not understood.
Nir
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list -- infra(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infra-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/infra@ovirt.org/message/YZKHQTISCF6...
--
Anton Marchukov
Team Lead - Release Management - RHV DevOps - Red Hat
> CI scripts try to modify unrelated bugs
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-2669
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2669
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: By-EMAIL
> Reporter: Nir Soffer
> Assignee: infra
>
> If a commit message mention another bug, the CI script try to add the patch
> to the bug in the commit message, and change the bug to POST.
> Mentioning another bug in a commit message is good practice, making it
> easier to follow, and avoiding unclear forms like "bug 1000000" or
> "BZ#1000000",
> or even worse shortened urls like https://goo.gl/bPuFGo.
> Does it make sense that we cannot link to Red Hat bugzilla like god
> intended?
> Here is a proof:
> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/97568/
> gerrit-hooks
> Patch Set 1:
> Check Bug-Url::10000000::WARN, failed to get bug info (private bug or
> bug doesn't exist
> Check Product::IGNORE, not relevant for branch: master
> Check TM::IGNORE, not relevant for branch: master
> Check Backport::IGNORE, not relevant for branch: master
> Set POST::#10000000::WARN, failed to get bug info (private bug or bug
> doesn't exist)
> Update Tracker::#10000000::WARN, failed to get bug info (private bug or
> bug doesn't exist)
> CI scripts should process urls only inside Bug-Url: tag.
> Expected behavior:
> Extract bug urls *only* from Bug-Url: label.
> The same issue exists with Related-To: label.
> This is not a new bug. I reported it few years ago but for some reason the
> issue
> was not understood.
> Nir
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100098)
5 years, 10 months