[JIRA] (OVIRT-2783) CI fails - tox error
by Nir Soffer (oVirt JIRA)
[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2783?page=com.atlassian.jir... ]
Nir Soffer commented on OVIRT-2783:
-----------------------------------
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019, 15:19 Pavel Bar <pbar(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> We experience problems with failed CI on VDSM patches.
>
Does it work locally and in travis?
Examples:
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/10633/
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/10634/
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/10635/
>
> This is what we see in logs:
>
> out=`tox --version`; \
> if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then \
> echo "Error: cannot run tox, please install tox \
> 2.9.1 or later"; \
> exit 1; \
> fi; \
> version=`echo $out | cut -d' ' -f1`; \
> if python2.7 build-aux/vercmp $version 2.9.1; then \
> echo "Error: tox is too old, please install tox \
> 2.9.1 or later"; \
> exit 1; \
> fi
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/tox", line 7, in <module>
> from tox import cmdline
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tox/__init__.py", line 4, in
> <module>
> from .hookspecs import hookimpl
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tox/hookspecs.py", line 4, in
> <module>
> from pluggy import HookimplMarker
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pluggy/__init__.py", line 16, in
> <module>
> from .manager import PluginManager, PluginValidationError
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pluggy/manager.py", line 6, in
> <module>
> import importlib_metadata
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/importlib_metadata/__init__.py",
> line 9, in <module>
> import zipp
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/zipp.py", line 12, in <module>
> import more_itertools
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/more_itertools/__init__.py", line
> 1, in <module>
> from more_itertools.more import * # noqa
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/more_itertools/more.py", line 340
> def _collate(*iterables, key=lambda a: a, reverse=False):
> ^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
> Error: cannot run tox, please install tox 2.9.1 or later
> make: *** [tox] Error 1
> + teardown
> + res=2
> + '[' 2 -ne 0 ']'
> + echo '*** err: 2'
> *** err: 2
> + collect_logs
> + tar --directory /var/log --exclude 'journal/*' -czf
> /home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_standard-check-patch/vdsm/exported-artifacts/mock_varlogs.tar.gz
> .
> + tar --directory /var/host_log --exclude 'journal/*' -czf
> /home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_standard-check-patch/vdsm/exported-artifacts/host_varlogs.tar.gz
> .
> + teardown_storage
> + python2 tests/storage/userstorage.py teardown
>
> Can someone look at it?
>
> Thank you in advance!
>
> Pavel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/VADZM35IRVN...
>
> CI fails - tox error
> --------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-2783
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2783
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: By-EMAIL
> Reporter: Pavel Bar
> Assignee: infra
>
> Hi,
> We experience problems with failed CI on VDSM patches.
> Examples:
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/10633/
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/10634/
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/10635/
> This is what we see in logs:
> out=`tox --version`; \
> if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then \
> echo "Error: cannot run tox, please install tox \
> 2.9.1 or later"; \
> exit 1; \
> fi; \
> version=`echo $out | cut -d' ' -f1`; \
> if python2.7 build-aux/vercmp $version 2.9.1; then \
> echo "Error: tox is too old, please install tox \
> 2.9.1 or later"; \
> exit 1; \
> fi
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/tox", line 7, in <module>
> from tox import cmdline
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tox/__init__.py", line 4, in
> <module>
> from .hookspecs import hookimpl
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tox/hookspecs.py", line 4, in
> <module>
> from pluggy import HookimplMarker
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pluggy/__init__.py", line 16, in
> <module>
> from .manager import PluginManager, PluginValidationError
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pluggy/manager.py", line 6, in
> <module>
> import importlib_metadata
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/importlib_metadata/__init__.py",
> line 9, in <module>
> import zipp
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/zipp.py", line 12, in <module>
> import more_itertools
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/more_itertools/__init__.py", line
> 1, in <module>
> from more_itertools.more import * # noqa
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/more_itertools/more.py", line 340
> def _collate(*iterables, key=lambda a: a, reverse=False):
> ^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
> Error: cannot run tox, please install tox 2.9.1 or later
> make: *** [tox] Error 1
> + teardown
> + res=2
> + '[' 2 -ne 0 ']'
> + echo '*** err: 2'
> *** err: 2
> + collect_logs
> + tar --directory /var/log --exclude 'journal/*' -czf
> /home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_standard-check-patch/vdsm/exported-artifacts/mock_varlogs.tar.gz
> .
> + tar --directory /var/host_log --exclude 'journal/*' -czf
> /home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_standard-check-patch/vdsm/exported-artifacts/host_varlogs.tar.gz
> .
> + teardown_storage
> + python2 tests/storage/userstorage.py teardown
> Can someone look at it?
> Thank you in advance!
> Pavel
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100107)
4 years, 8 months
[JIRA] (OVIRT-2783) CI fails - tox error
by Eyal Edri (oVirt JIRA)
[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2783?page=com.atlassian.jir... ]
Eyal Edri commented on OVIRT-2783:
----------------------------------
It looks like a syntax error, before it can’t install tox:
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/more_itertools/more.py", line 340def _collate(*iterables, key=lambda a: a, reverse=False):^SyntaxError: invalid syntax
> CI fails - tox error
> --------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-2783
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2783
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: By-EMAIL
> Reporter: Pavel Bar
> Assignee: infra
>
> Hi,
> We experience problems with failed CI on VDSM patches.
> Examples:
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/10633/
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/10634/
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/10635/
> This is what we see in logs:
> out=`tox --version`; \
> if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then \
> echo "Error: cannot run tox, please install tox \
> 2.9.1 or later"; \
> exit 1; \
> fi; \
> version=`echo $out | cut -d' ' -f1`; \
> if python2.7 build-aux/vercmp $version 2.9.1; then \
> echo "Error: tox is too old, please install tox \
> 2.9.1 or later"; \
> exit 1; \
> fi
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/tox", line 7, in <module>
> from tox import cmdline
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tox/__init__.py", line 4, in
> <module>
> from .hookspecs import hookimpl
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tox/hookspecs.py", line 4, in
> <module>
> from pluggy import HookimplMarker
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pluggy/__init__.py", line 16, in
> <module>
> from .manager import PluginManager, PluginValidationError
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pluggy/manager.py", line 6, in
> <module>
> import importlib_metadata
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/importlib_metadata/__init__.py",
> line 9, in <module>
> import zipp
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/zipp.py", line 12, in <module>
> import more_itertools
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/more_itertools/__init__.py", line
> 1, in <module>
> from more_itertools.more import * # noqa
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/more_itertools/more.py", line 340
> def _collate(*iterables, key=lambda a: a, reverse=False):
> ^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
> Error: cannot run tox, please install tox 2.9.1 or later
> make: *** [tox] Error 1
> + teardown
> + res=2
> + '[' 2 -ne 0 ']'
> + echo '*** err: 2'
> *** err: 2
> + collect_logs
> + tar --directory /var/log --exclude 'journal/*' -czf
> /home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_standard-check-patch/vdsm/exported-artifacts/mock_varlogs.tar.gz
> .
> + tar --directory /var/host_log --exclude 'journal/*' -czf
> /home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_standard-check-patch/vdsm/exported-artifacts/host_varlogs.tar.gz
> .
> + teardown_storage
> + python2 tests/storage/userstorage.py teardown
> Can someone look at it?
> Thank you in advance!
> Pavel
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100107)
4 years, 8 months
[JIRA] (OVIRT-2783) CI fails - tox error
by Pavel Bar (oVirt JIRA)
Pavel Bar created OVIRT-2783:
--------------------------------
Summary: CI fails - tox error
Key: OVIRT-2783
URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2783
Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
Issue Type: By-EMAIL
Reporter: Pavel Bar
Assignee: infra
Hi,
We experience problems with failed CI on VDSM patches.
Examples:
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/10633/
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/10634/
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/10635/
This is what we see in logs:
out=`tox --version`; \
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then \
echo "Error: cannot run tox, please install tox \
2.9.1 or later"; \
exit 1; \
fi; \
version=`echo $out | cut -d' ' -f1`; \
if python2.7 build-aux/vercmp $version 2.9.1; then \
echo "Error: tox is too old, please install tox \
2.9.1 or later"; \
exit 1; \
fi
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/tox", line 7, in <module>
from tox import cmdline
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tox/__init__.py", line 4, in
<module>
from .hookspecs import hookimpl
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tox/hookspecs.py", line 4, in
<module>
from pluggy import HookimplMarker
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pluggy/__init__.py", line 16, in
<module>
from .manager import PluginManager, PluginValidationError
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pluggy/manager.py", line 6, in
<module>
import importlib_metadata
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/importlib_metadata/__init__.py",
line 9, in <module>
import zipp
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/zipp.py", line 12, in <module>
import more_itertools
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/more_itertools/__init__.py", line
1, in <module>
from more_itertools.more import * # noqa
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/more_itertools/more.py", line 340
def _collate(*iterables, key=lambda a: a, reverse=False):
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Error: cannot run tox, please install tox 2.9.1 or later
make: *** [tox] Error 1
+ teardown
+ res=2
+ '[' 2 -ne 0 ']'
+ echo '*** err: 2'
*** err: 2
+ collect_logs
+ tar --directory /var/log --exclude 'journal/*' -czf
/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_standard-check-patch/vdsm/exported-artifacts/mock_varlogs.tar.gz
.
+ tar --directory /var/host_log --exclude 'journal/*' -czf
/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_standard-check-patch/vdsm/exported-artifacts/host_varlogs.tar.gz
.
+ teardown_storage
+ python2 tests/storage/userstorage.py teardown
Can someone look at it?
Thank you in advance!
Pavel
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100107)
4 years, 8 months
[oVirt] [CQ weekly status] [25-08-2019]
by Dusan Fodor
Hi,
This mail is to provide the current status of CQ and allow people to review
status before and after the weekend.
Please refer to below colour map for further information on the meaning of
the colours.
*CQ-4.2*: GREEN (#2)
Last failure was on 20-08 for ovirt-ansible-hosted-engine-setup. It was
caused by random network issue (fetching repo from github), retriggered job
for the change passed well.
*CQ-4.3*: GREEN (#2)
Last failure was on 20-08 for ovirt-ansible-hosted-engine-setup. It was
caused by random network issue, retriggered job for the change passed well.
*CQ-Master:* RED (#1)
Last failure was on 25-08 for ovirt-engine, caused by failed cloning of
engine repo (even with lately increased timeout value 20min). Related
ticket from last time was reopened.
Current running jobs for 4.2 [1], 4.3 [2] and master [3] can be found
here:
[1] http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/Change%20queue%20jobs/job/ovirt
-4.2_change-queue-tester/
[2] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/Change%20queue%20jobs/job/ovirt
-4.3_change-queue-tester/
[3] http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/Change%20queue%20jobs/job/ovirt
-master_change-queue-tester/
Have a nice week!
Dusan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COLOUR MAP
Green = job has been passing successfully
** green for more than 3 days may suggest we need a review of our test
coverage
1.
1-3 days GREEN (#1)
2.
4-7 days GREEN (#2)
3.
Over 7 days GREEN (#3)
Yellow = intermittent failures for different projects but no lasting or
current regressions
** intermittent would be a healthy project as we expect a number of
failures during the week
** I will not report any of the solved failures or regressions.
1.
Solved job failures YELLOW (#1)
2.
Solved regressions YELLOW (#2)
Red = job has been failing
** Active Failures. The colour will change based on the amount of time the
project/s has been broken. Only active regressions would be reported.
1.
1-3 days RED (#1)
2.
4-7 days RED (#2)
3.
Over 7 days RED (#3)
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt
.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt
.org/message/YCNCKRK3G4EJXA3OCYAUS4VMKRDA67F4/
4 years, 8 months
[JIRA] (OVIRT-2782) Configure Jenkins to wait less and allocate
more
by Daniel Belenky (oVirt JIRA)
[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2782?page=com.atlassian.jir... ]
Daniel Belenky updated OVIRT-2782:
----------------------------------
Description:
By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting
{code:java}
hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
{code}
We can also control the excessive workload threshold and force Jenkins to allocate slaves for jobs in the queue... but, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we set it's margins to higher values and it effectively lowers its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
The recommended settings by the k8s plugin to spawn a node for every build in the queue:
{code:java}
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN=50
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN0=0.85
{code}
was:
By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting
{code:java}
hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
{code}
We can also control the excessive workload threshold and force Jenkins to allocate slaves for jobs in the queue... but, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we set it's margins to higher values and it effectively lowers its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
The recommended settings by the k8s plugin to spawn a node for every build in the queue:
```
By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting `hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay` to `0`. But, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we also can lower its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
{code:java}
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN=50
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN0=0.85
{code}
> Configure Jenkins to wait less and allocate more
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-2782
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2782
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Daniel Belenky
> Assignee: infra
>
> By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting
> {code:java}
> hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
> {code}
> We can also control the excessive workload threshold and force Jenkins to allocate slaves for jobs in the queue... but, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we set it's margins to higher values and it effectively lowers its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
> The recommended settings by the k8s plugin to spawn a node for every build in the queue:
> {code:java}
> -Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
> -Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN=50
> -Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN0=0.85
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100107)
4 years, 8 months
[JIRA] (OVIRT-2782) Configure Jenkins to wait less and allocate
more
by Daniel Belenky (oVirt JIRA)
[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2782?page=com.atlassian.jir... ]
Daniel Belenky updated OVIRT-2782:
----------------------------------
Description:
By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting
{code:java}
hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
{code}
We can also control the excessive workload threshold and force Jenkins to allocate slaves for jobs in the queue... but, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we set it's margins to higher values and it effectively lowers its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
The recommended settings by the k8s plugin to spawn a node for every build in the queue:
```
By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting `hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay` to `0`. But, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we also can lower its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
{code:java}
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN=50
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN0=0.85
{code}
was:
By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting
{code:java}
hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
{code}
But, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we also can control it's margins to lower its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
The recommended settings by the k8s plugin to spawn a node for every build in the queue:
```
By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting `hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay` to `0`. But, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we also can lower its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
{code:java}
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN=50
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN0=0.85
{code}
> Configure Jenkins to wait less and allocate more
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-2782
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2782
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Daniel Belenky
> Assignee: infra
>
> By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting
> {code:java}
> hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
> {code}
> We can also control the excessive workload threshold and force Jenkins to allocate slaves for jobs in the queue... but, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we set it's margins to higher values and it effectively lowers its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
> The recommended settings by the k8s plugin to spawn a node for every build in the queue:
> ```
> By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting `hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay` to `0`. But, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we also can lower its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
> {code:java}
> -Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
> -Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN=50
> -Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN0=0.85
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100107)
4 years, 8 months
[JIRA] (OVIRT-2782) Configure Jenkins to wait less and allocate
more
by Daniel Belenky (oVirt JIRA)
[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2782?page=com.atlassian.jir... ]
Daniel Belenky updated OVIRT-2782:
----------------------------------
Description:
By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting
{code:java}
hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
{code}
But, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we also can control it's margins to lower its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
The recommended settings by the k8s plugin to spawn a node for every build in the queue:
```
By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting `hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay` to `0`. But, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we also can lower its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
{code:java}
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN=50
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN0=0.85
{code}
was:
By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting
{code:java}
hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay
{code}
to `0`. But, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we also can control it's margins to lower its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
The recommended settings by the k8s plugin to spawn a node for every build in the queue:
```
By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting `hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay` to `0`. But, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we also can lower its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
{code:java}
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN=50
-Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN0=0.85
{code}
> Configure Jenkins to wait less and allocate more
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-2782
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2782
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Daniel Belenky
> Assignee: infra
>
> By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting
> {code:java}
> hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
> {code}
> But, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we also can control it's margins to lower its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
> The recommended settings by the k8s plugin to spawn a node for every build in the queue:
> ```
> By default, Jenkins is configured to wait a few seconds before allocating a new node in a hope that a node in use to be freed. We can control this setting by setting `hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay` to `0`. But, because Jenkins computes the excess workload value (which decides if we need to allocate a new node) using an EMA, we also can lower its threshold so that Jenkins will allocate nodes faster and in advance.
> {code:java}
> -Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.initialDelay=0
> -Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN=50
> -Dhudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.MARGIN0=0.85
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100107)
4 years, 8 months
