- Infra - oVirt List Archives

[oVirt Jenkins] ovirt-node-ng_master_build-artifacts-fc28-x86_64 - Build # 1 - Failure!
by jenkins＠jenkins.phx.ovirt.org 19 Jul '18

19 Jul '18

Project: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-node-ng_master_build-artifacts-fc28-x86_… Build: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-node-ng_master_build-artifacts-fc28-x86_… Build Number: 1 Build Status: Failure Triggered By: Started by user Sandro Bonazzola ------------------------------------- Changes Since Last Success: ------------------------------------- ----------------- Failed Tests: ----------------- No tests ran.

1 0

[oVirt Jenkins] ovirt-system-tests_hc-basic-suite-master - Build # 584 - Failure!
by jenkins＠jenkins.phx.ovirt.org 19 Jul '18

19 Jul '18

Project: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_hc-basic-suite-master/ Build: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_hc-basic-suite-master/584/ Build Number: 584 Build Status: Failure Triggered By: Started by timer ------------------------------------- Changes Since Last Success: ------------------------------------- Changes for Build #584 [Milan Zamazal] Add basic-suite-compat-master ----------------- Failed Tests: ----------------- 1 tests failed. FAILED: 002_bootstrap.add_hosts Error Message: Failed to read response: [(<pycurl.Curl object at 0x7f896806eda8>, 7, 'TCP connection reset by peer')] -------------------- >> begin captured logging << -------------------- ovirtlago.testlib: ERROR: * Unhandled exception in <function _host_is_up_4 at 0x7f8963beac08> Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/testlib.py", line 219, in assert_equals_within res = func() File "/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-system-tests_hc-basic-suite-master/ovirt-system-tests/hc-basic-suite-master/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py", line 253, in _host_is_up_4 host_obj = host_service.get() File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/services.py", line 36676, in get return self._internal_get(headers, query, wait) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py", line 211, in _internal_get return future.wait() if wait else future File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py", line 54, in wait response = self._connection.wait(self._context) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/__init__.py", line 496, in wait return self.__wait(context, failed_auth) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/__init__.py", line 510, in __wait raise Error("Failed to read response: {}".format(err_list)) Error: Failed to read response: [(<pycurl.Curl object at 0x7f896806eda8>, 7, 'TCP connection reset by peer')] --------------------- >> end captured logging << --------------------- Stack Trace: File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 369, in run testMethod() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/case.py", line 197, in runTest self.test(*self.arg) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/testlib.py", line 129, in wrapped_test test() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/testlib.py", line 59, in wrapper return func(get_test_prefix(), *args, **kwargs) File "/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-system-tests_hc-basic-suite-master/ovirt-system-tests/hc-basic-suite-master/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py", line 228, in add_hosts add_hosts_4(prefix) File "/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-system-tests_hc-basic-suite-master/ovirt-system-tests/hc-basic-suite-master/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py", line 275, in add_hosts_4 testlib.assert_true_within(_host_is_up_4, timeout=15*60) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/testlib.py", line 263, in assert_true_within assert_equals_within(func, True, timeout, allowed_exceptions) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/testlib.py", line 219, in assert_equals_within res = func() File "/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-system-tests_hc-basic-suite-master/ovirt-system-tests/hc-basic-suite-master/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py", line 253, in _host_is_up_4 host_obj = host_service.get() File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/services.py", line 36676, in get return self._internal_get(headers, query, wait) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py", line 211, in _internal_get return future.wait() if wait else future File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py", line 54, in wait response = self._connection.wait(self._context) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/__init__.py", line 496, in wait return self.__wait(context, failed_auth) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/__init__.py", line 510, in __wait raise Error("Failed to read response: {}".format(err_list)) 'Failed to read response: [(<pycurl.Curl object at 0x7f896806eda8>, 7, \'TCP connection reset by peer\')]\n-------------------- >> begin captured logging << --------------------\novirtlago.testlib: ERROR: * Unhandled exception in <function _host_is_up_4 at 0x7f8963beac08>\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/testlib.py", line 219, in assert_equals_within\n res = func()\n File "/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-system-tests_hc-basic-suite-master/ovirt-system-tests/hc-basic-suite-master/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py", line 253, in _host_is_up_4\n host_obj = host_service.get()\n File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/services.py", line 36676, in get\n return self._internal_get(headers, query, wait)\n File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py", line 211, in _internal_get\n return future.wait() if wait else future\n File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py", line 54, in wait\n response = self._connection.wait(self._context)\n File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/__init__.py", line 496, in wait\n return self.__wait(context, failed_auth)\n File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/__init__.py", line 510, in __wait\n raise Error("Failed to read response: {}".format(err_list))\nError: Failed to read response: [(<pycurl.Curl object at 0x7f896806eda8>, 7, \'TCP connection reset by peer\')]\n--------------------- >> end captured logging << ---------------------'

1 2

[JIRA] (OVIRT-2348) 004_basic_sanity.test_gen test failed for ovirt-master in vdsm project
by Milan Zamazal (oVirt JIRA) 19 Jul '18

19 Jul '18

[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.… ] Milan Zamazal edited comment on OVIRT-2348 at 7/19/18 3:38 PM: --------------------------------------------------------------- The bug is in 004_basic_sanity.preview_snapshot_with_memory test. The following check for successful snapshot creation is used: {code:python} snapshot = test_utils.get_snapshot(engine, VM0_NAME, SNAPSHOT_DESC_MEM) return (snapshot is not None and snapshot.snapshot_status == types.SnapshotStatus.OK) {code} However the check passes even when the snapshot is not finished yet, resulting in the reported bug. There is add_vm_pool test running between snapshot start and that check. If snapshot creation is faster than adding a VM pool, which seems to be the regular case, the check doesn't matter and the failure doesn't occur. So the problem is not much urgent. I don't know yet what's wrong with the check, but I'll try to fix it. Please note there is an unrelated bug causing the test name reported being test_gen rather than the actual test name. It was introduced in a recent OST change and a fix is posted: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/93167. It can be merged as soon as CI passes (it's currently stuck, waiting on an available executor). was (Author: mzamazal(a)redhat.com) The bug is in 004_basic_sanity.preview_snapshot_with_memory test. The following check for successful snapshot creation is used: {code:python} snapshot = test_utils.get_snapshot(engine, VM0_NAME, SNAPSHOT_DESC_MEM) return (snapshot is not None and snapshot.snapshot_status == types.SnapshotStatus.OK) {code} However the check passes even when the snapshot is not finished yet, resulting in the reported bug. There is add_vm_pool test running between snapshot start and that check. If snapshot creation is faster than adding a VM pool, which seems to be the regular case, the check doesn't matter and the failure doesn't occur. So the problem is not much urgent. I don't know yet what's wrong with the check, but I'll try to fix it. Please note there is an unrelated bug causing the test name reported being test_gen rather than the actual test name. It was introduced in a recent OST change and a fix is posted: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/93167. It can be merged as soon as CI passes (it's currently stuck, waiting on an available executor). > 004_basic_sanity.test_gen test failed for ovirt-master in vdsm project > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OVIRT-2348 > URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2348 > Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Dafna Ron > Assignee: infra > Priority: High > Labels: ost_code_regression, ost_failures > > The patch that CQ marked seems to be related. > [~fromani(a)redhat.com] the patch that failed CQ is: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/93046/ > you can look at the build's logs here: > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/8725/artifac… > the engine log shows several tasks that fail and then there is an exception: > https://pastebin.com/6f5QTZUH -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100090)

1 0

[JIRA] (OVIRT-2348) 004_basic_sanity.test_gen test failed for ovirt-master in vdsm project
by Milan Zamazal (oVirt JIRA) 19 Jul '18

19 Jul '18

[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.… ] Milan Zamazal commented on OVIRT-2348: -------------------------------------- The bug is in 004_basic_sanity.preview_snapshot_with_memory test. The following check for successful snapshot creation is used: {code:python} snapshot = test_utils.get_snapshot(engine, VM0_NAME, SNAPSHOT_DESC_MEM) return (snapshot is not None and snapshot.snapshot_status == types.SnapshotStatus.OK) {code} However the check passes even when the snapshot is not finished yet, resulting in the reported bug. There is add_vm_pool test running between snapshot start and that check. If snapshot creation is faster than adding a VM pool, which seems to be the regular case, the check doesn't matter and the failure doesn't occur. So the problem is not much urgent. I don't know yet what's wrong with the check, but I'll try to fix it. Please note there is an unrelated bug causing the test name reported being test_gen rather than the actual test name. It was introduced in a recent OST change and a fix is posted: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/93167. It can be merged as soon as CI passes (it's currently stuck, waiting on an available executor). > 004_basic_sanity.test_gen test failed for ovirt-master in vdsm project > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OVIRT-2348 > URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2348 > Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Dafna Ron > Assignee: infra > Priority: High > Labels: ost_code_regression, ost_failures > > The patch that CQ marked seems to be related. > [~fromani(a)redhat.com] the patch that failed CQ is: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/93046/ > you can look at the build's logs here: > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/8725/artifac… > the engine log shows several tasks that fail and then there is an exception: > https://pastebin.com/6f5QTZUH -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100090)

1 0

[JIRA] (OVIRT-2345) Allow parallel reposyncs
by Daniel Belenky (oVirt JIRA) 19 Jul '18

19 Jul '18

[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2345?page=com.atlassian.jira.… ] Daniel Belenky commented on OVIRT-2345: --------------------------------------- [~gbenhaim(a)redhat.com] we've decided to avoid anything complex - just create per-container data dir right? > Allow parallel reposyncs > ------------------------ > > Key: OVIRT-2345 > URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2345 > Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Daniel Belenky > Assignee: infra > > Since we're going to run multiple suites in parallel on the same host, the repolock may become a bottle neck. We probably will need per-container cache or something similar. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100090)

1 0

[oVirt Jenkins] ovirt-node-ng_master_build-artifacts-el7-x86_64 - Build # 860 - Failure!
by jenkins＠jenkins.phx.ovirt.org 19 Jul '18

19 Jul '18

Project: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-node-ng_master_build-artifacts-el7-x86_6… Build: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-node-ng_master_build-artifacts-el7-x86_6… Build Number: 860 Build Status: Failure Triggered By: Started by timer ------------------------------------- Changes Since Last Success: ------------------------------------- Changes for Build #860 [Yuval Turgeman] ovirt-appliance: add fc28 jobs [Ryan Barry] kickstart: let VDSM reconfigure itself ----------------- Failed Tests: ----------------- No tests ran.

1 1

[oVirt Jenkins] ovirt-system-tests_he-basic-iscsi-suite-master - Build # 347 - Failure!
by jenkins＠jenkins.phx.ovirt.org 19 Jul '18

19 Jul '18

Project: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_he-basic-iscsi-suite-master/ Build: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_he-basic-iscsi-suite-master… Build Number: 347 Build Status: Failure Triggered By: Started by timer ------------------------------------- Changes Since Last Success: ------------------------------------- Changes for Build #347 [Milan Zamazal] Add basic-suite-compat-master ----------------- Failed Tests: ----------------- All tests passed

1 1

Jenkins build became unstable: ovirt_4.2_publish-rpms_nightly #281
by jenkins＠jenkins.phx.ovirt.org 19 Jul '18

19 Jul '18

See <http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt_4.2_publish-rpms_nightly/281/display/red…>

1 1

[JIRA] (OVIRT-2352) Add isolation_level support in stdci dsl
by Daniel Belenky (oVirt JIRA) 19 Jul '18

19 Jul '18

[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2352?page=com.atlassian.jira.… ] Daniel Belenky reassigned OVIRT-2352: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Daniel Belenky (was: infra) > Add isolation_level support in stdci dsl > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: OVIRT-2352 > URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2352 > Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Daniel Belenky > Assignee: Daniel Belenky > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100090)

1 0

[JIRA] (OVIRT-2352) Add isolation_level support in stdci dsl
by Daniel Belenky (oVirt JIRA) 19 Jul '18

19 Jul '18

[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2352?page=com.atlassian.jira.… ] Daniel Belenky edited comment on OVIRT-2352 at 7/19/18 11:25 AM: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Containerized hosts are labeled with a specific label. We need to allow projects to specify several isolation levels: physical, virtual, container. was (Author: dbelenky(a)redhat.com) Containerized hosts are labeled with a specific label. We need to allow projects to specify several isolation levels: vm, bare-metal, container. > Add isolation_level support in stdci dsl > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: OVIRT-2352 > URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2352 > Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Daniel Belenky > Assignee: infra > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100090)

1 0