- Infra - oVirt List Archives

oVirt infra daily report - unstable production jobs - 1464
by jenkins＠jenkins.phx.ovirt.org 11 Feb '21

11 Feb '21

Good morning! Attached is the HTML page with the jenkins status report. You can see it also here: - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/system_jenkins-report/1464//artifact/exported… Cheers, Jenkins

1 0

[CQ]: 113340, 12 (ovirt-system-tests) failed "ovirt-master" system tests, but isn't the failure root cause
by oVirt Jenkins 11 Feb '21

11 Feb '21

A system test invoked by the "ovirt-master" change queue including change 113340,12 (ovirt-system-tests) failed. However, this change seems not to be the root cause for this failure. Change 113144,5 (ovirt-system-tests) that this change depends on or is based on, was detected as the cause of the testing failures. This change had been removed from the testing queue. Artifacts built from this change will not be released until either change 113144,5 (ovirt-system-tests) is fixed and this change is updated to refer to or rebased on the fixed version, or this change is modified to no longer depend on it. For further details about the change see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/ovirt-system-tests/+/#/c/113340/12 For further details about the change that seems to be the root cause behind the testing failures see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/ovirt-system-tests/+/#/c/113144/5 For failed test results see: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/28166/

1 0

[CQ]: 113422, 2 (ovirt-system-tests) failed "ovirt-master" system tests, but isn't the failure root cause
by oVirt Jenkins 11 Feb '21

11 Feb '21

A system test invoked by the "ovirt-master" change queue including change 113422,2 (ovirt-system-tests) failed. However, this change seems not to be the root cause for this failure. Change 113144,5 (ovirt-system-tests) that this change depends on or is based on, was detected as the cause of the testing failures. This change had been removed from the testing queue. Artifacts built from this change will not be released until either change 113144,5 (ovirt-system-tests) is fixed and this change is updated to refer to or rebased on the fixed version, or this change is modified to no longer depend on it. For further details about the change see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/ovirt-system-tests/+/#/c/113422/2 For further details about the change that seems to be the root cause behind the testing failures see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/ovirt-system-tests/+/#/c/113144/5 For failed test results see: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/28162/

1 0

[CQ]: 113433, 2 (ovirt-system-tests) failed "ovirt-master" system tests, but isn't the failure root cause
by oVirt Jenkins 11 Feb '21

11 Feb '21

A system test invoked by the "ovirt-master" change queue including change 113433,2 (ovirt-system-tests) failed. However, this change seems not to be the root cause for this failure. Change 113144,5 (ovirt-system-tests) that this change depends on or is based on, was detected as the cause of the testing failures. This change had been removed from the testing queue. Artifacts built from this change will not be released until either change 113144,5 (ovirt-system-tests) is fixed and this change is updated to refer to or rebased on the fixed version, or this change is modified to no longer depend on it. For further details about the change see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/ovirt-system-tests/+/#/c/113433/2 For further details about the change that seems to be the root cause behind the testing failures see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/ovirt-system-tests/+/#/c/113144/5 For failed test results see: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/28160/

1 0

[CQ]: 113442, 1 (ovirt-system-tests) failed "ovirt-master" system tests, but isn't the failure root cause
by oVirt Jenkins 11 Feb '21

11 Feb '21

A system test invoked by the "ovirt-master" change queue including change 113442,1 (ovirt-system-tests) failed. However, this change seems not to be the root cause for this failure. Change 113144,5 (ovirt-system-tests) that this change depends on or is based on, was detected as the cause of the testing failures. This change had been removed from the testing queue. Artifacts built from this change will not be released until either change 113144,5 (ovirt-system-tests) is fixed and this change is updated to refer to or rebased on the fixed version, or this change is modified to no longer depend on it. For further details about the change see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/ovirt-system-tests/+/#/c/113442/1 For further details about the change that seems to be the root cause behind the testing failures see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/ovirt-system-tests/+/#/c/113144/5 For failed test results see: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/28157/

1 0

[oVirt Jenkins] ovirt-system-tests_basic-suite-master_nightly - Build # 855 - Failure!
by jenkins＠jenkins.phx.ovirt.org 11 Feb '21

11 Feb '21

Project: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_basic-suite-master_nightly/ Build: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_basic-suite-master_nightly… Build Number: 855 Build Status: Failure Triggered By: Started by timer ------------------------------------- Changes Since Last Success: ------------------------------------- Changes for Build #855 [Eitan Raviv] network: remove fqdn from /etc/hosts ----------------- Failed Tests: ----------------- 1 tests failed. FAILED: basic-suite-master.test-scenarios.test_002_bootstrap.test_add_nfs_master_storage_domain Error Message: AssertionError: False != True after 600 seconds Stack Trace: engine = <ovirtsdk4.services.SystemService object at 0x7f99e79d9240> event_id = [956] @contextlib.contextmanager def wait_for_event(engine, event_id): ''' event_id could either be an int - a single event ID or a list - multiple event IDs that all will be checked ''' events = engine.events_service() last_event = int(events.list(max=2)[0].id) try: > yield ../ost_utils/ost_utils/engine_utils.py:38: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ api = <ovirtsdk4.Connection object at 0x7f99e79d9470> domain = <ovirtsdk4.types.StorageDomain object at 0x7f99e692cda0> dc_name = 'test-dc' def add(api, domain, dc_name): system_service = api.system_service() sds_service = system_service.storage_domains_service() with engine_utils.wait_for_event(system_service, 956): # USER_ADD_STORAGE_DOMAIN(956) > sd = sds_service.add(domain) ../ost_utils/ost_utils/storage_utils/domain.py:33: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = <ovirtsdk4.services.StorageDomainsService object at 0x7f99e692ca20> storage_domain = <ovirtsdk4.types.StorageDomain object at 0x7f99e692cda0> headers = None, query = {}, wait = True, kwargs = {} def add( self, storage_domain, headers=None, query=None, wait=True, **kwargs ): """ Adds a new storage domain. Creation of a new <<types/storage_domain,StorageDomain>> requires the `name`, `type`, `host`, and `storage` attributes. Identify the `host` attribute with the `id` or `name` attributes. In {product-name} 3.6 and later you can enable the wipe after delete option by default on the storage domain. To configure this, specify `wipe_after_delete` in the POST request. This option can be edited after the domain is created, but doing so will not change the wipe after delete property of disks that already exist. To add a new storage domain with specified `name`, `type`, `storage.type`, `storage.address`, and `storage.path`, and using a host with an id `123`, send a request like this: [source] ---- POST /ovirt-engine/api/storageDomains ---- With a request body like this: [source,xml] ---- <storage_domain> <name>mydata</name> <type>data</type> <storage> <type>nfs</type> <address>mynfs.example.com</address> <path>/exports/mydata</path> </storage> <host> <name>myhost</name> </host> </storage_domain> ---- To create a new NFS ISO storage domain send a request like this: [source,xml] ---- <storage_domain> <name>myisos</name> <type>iso</type> <storage> <type>nfs</type> <address>mynfs.example.com</address> <path>/export/myisos</path> </storage> <host> <name>myhost</name> </host> </storage_domain> ---- To create a new iSCSI storage domain send a request like this: [source,xml] ---- <storage_domain> <name>myiscsi</name> <type>data</type> <storage> <type>iscsi</type> <logical_units> <logical_unit id="3600144f09dbd050000004eedbd340001"/> <logical_unit id="3600144f09dbd050000004eedbd340002"/> </logical_units> </storage> <host> <name>myhost</name> </host> </storage_domain> ---- This method supports the following parameters: `storage_domain`:: The storage domain to add. `headers`:: Additional HTTP headers. `query`:: Additional URL query parameters. `wait`:: If `True` wait for the response. """ # Check the types of the parameters: Service._check_types([ ('storage_domain', storage_domain, types.StorageDomain), ]) # Build the URL: query = query or {} # Send the request and wait for the response: > return self._internal_add(storage_domain, headers, query, wait) /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/services.py:26182: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = <ovirtsdk4.services.StorageDomainsService object at 0x7f99e692ca20> object = <ovirtsdk4.types.StorageDomain object at 0x7f99e692cda0>, headers = {} query = {}, wait = True def _internal_add(self, object, headers=None, query=None, wait=None): """ Executes an `add` method. """ # Populate the headers: headers = headers or {} # Send the request and wait for the response: request = http.Request(method='POST', path=self._path, query=query, headers=headers) request.body = writer.Writer.write(object, indent=True) context = self._connection.send(request) def callback(response): if response.code in [200, 201, 202]: return self._internal_read_body(response) else: self._check_fault(response) future = Future(self._connection, context, callback) > return future.wait() if wait else future /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py:232: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = <ovirtsdk4.service.Future object at 0x7f99e692ceb8> def wait(self): """ Waits till the result of the operation that created this future is available. """ response = self._connection.wait(self._context) > return self._code(response) /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py:55: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ response = <ovirtsdk4.http.Response object at 0x7f99e692c4a8> def callback(response): if response.code in [200, 201, 202]: return self._internal_read_body(response) else: > self._check_fault(response) /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py:229: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = <ovirtsdk4.services.StorageDomainsService object at 0x7f99e692ca20> response = <ovirtsdk4.http.Response object at 0x7f99e692c4a8> def _check_fault(self, response): """ Reads the response body assuming that it contains a fault message, converts it to an exception and raises it. This method is intended for internal use by other components of the SDK. Refrain from using it directly, as backwards compatibility isn't guaranteed. """ body = self._internal_read_body(response) if isinstance(body, types.Fault): > self._raise_error(response, body) /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py:132: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ response = <ovirtsdk4.http.Response object at 0x7f99e692c4a8> detail = <ovirtsdk4.types.Fault object at 0x7f99e692c4e0> @staticmethod def _raise_error(response, detail=None): """ Creates and raises an error containing the details of the given HTTP response and fault. This method is intended for internal use by other components of the SDK. Refrain from using it directly, as backwards compatibility isn't guaranteed. """ fault = detail if isinstance(detail, types.Fault) else None msg = '' if fault: if fault.reason: if msg: msg += ' ' msg = msg + 'Fault reason is "%s".' % fault.reason if fault.detail: if msg: msg += ' ' msg = msg + 'Fault detail is "%s".' % fault.detail if response: if response.code: if msg: msg += ' ' msg = msg + 'HTTP response code is %s.' % response.code if response.message: if msg: msg += ' ' msg = msg + 'HTTP response message is "%s".' % response.message if isinstance(detail, six.string_types): if msg: msg += ' ' msg = msg + detail + '.' class_ = Error if response is not None: if response.code in [401, 403]: class_ = AuthError elif response.code == 404: class_ = NotFoundError error = class_(msg) error.code = response.code if response else None error.fault = fault > raise error E ovirtsdk4.Error: Fault reason is "Operation Failed". Fault detail is "[Network error during communication with the Host.]". HTTP response code is 400. /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py:118: Error During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: engine_api = <ovirtsdk4.Connection object at 0x7f99e79d9470> sd_nfs_host_storage_ip = '192.168.202.2' @order_by(_TEST_LIST) @pytest.mark.skipif(MASTER_SD_TYPE != 'nfs', reason='not using nfs') def test_add_nfs_master_storage_domain(engine_api, sd_nfs_host_storage_ip): > add_nfs_storage_domain(engine_api, sd_nfs_host_storage_ip) ../basic-suite-master/test-scenarios/test_002_bootstrap.py:545: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ../basic-suite-master/test-scenarios/test_002_bootstrap.py:554: in add_nfs_storage_domain nfs_version='v4_2') ../ost_utils/ost_utils/storage_utils/nfs.py:62: in add_domain domain.add(engine_api, p, dc_name) ../ost_utils/ost_utils/storage_utils/domain.py:37: in add lambda: sd_service.get().status == sdk4.types.StorageDomainStatus.UNATTACHED /usr/lib64/python3.6/contextlib.py:99: in __exit__ self.gen.throw(type, value, traceback) ../ost_utils/ost_utils/engine_utils.py:44: in wait_for_event lambda: ../ost_utils/ost_utils/assertions.py:98: in assert_true_within_long assert_equals_within_long(func, True, allowed_exceptions) ../ost_utils/ost_utils/assertions.py:83: in assert_equals_within_long func, value, LONG_TIMEOUT, allowed_exceptions=allowed_exceptions _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ func = <function wait_for_event.<locals>.<lambda> at 0x7f99e6924d90> value = True, timeout = 600, allowed_exceptions = [], initial_wait = 0 error_message = 'False != True after 600 seconds' def assert_equals_within( func, value, timeout, allowed_exceptions=None, initial_wait=10, error_message=None ): allowed_exceptions = allowed_exceptions or [] res = '<no-result-obtained>' with _EggTimer(timeout) as timer: while not timer.elapsed(): try: res = func() if res == value: return except Exception as exc: if _instance_of_any(exc, allowed_exceptions): time.sleep(3) continue LOGGER.exception("Unhandled exception in %s", func) raise if initial_wait == 0: time.sleep(3) else: time.sleep(initial_wait) initial_wait = 0 try: if error_message is None: error_message = '%s != %s after %s seconds' % (res, value, timeout) > raise AssertionError(error_message) E AssertionError: False != True after 600 seconds ../ost_utils/ost_utils/assertions.py:61: AssertionError

1 6

oVirt infra daily report - unstable production jobs - 1463
by jenkins＠jenkins.phx.ovirt.org 10 Feb '21

10 Feb '21

Good morning! Attached is the HTML page with the jenkins status report. You can see it also here: - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/system_jenkins-report/1463//artifact/exported… Cheers, Jenkins

1 0

[CQ]: 113397, 5 (ovirt-system-tests) failed "ovirt-master" system tests, but isn't the failure root cause
by oVirt Jenkins 10 Feb '21

10 Feb '21

A system test invoked by the "ovirt-master" change queue including change 113397,5 (ovirt-system-tests) failed. However, this change seems not to be the root cause for this failure. Change 113144,5 (ovirt-system-tests) that this change depends on or is based on, was detected as the cause of the testing failures. This change had been removed from the testing queue. Artifacts built from this change will not be released until either change 113144,5 (ovirt-system-tests) is fixed and this change is updated to refer to or rebased on the fixed version, or this change is modified to no longer depend on it. For further details about the change see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/ovirt-system-tests/+/#/c/113397/5 For further details about the change that seems to be the root cause behind the testing failures see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/ovirt-system-tests/+/#/c/113144/5 For failed test results see: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/28119/

1 0

[CQ]: 113396, 3 (ovirt-system-tests) failed "ovirt-master" system tests, but isn't the failure root cause
by oVirt Jenkins 10 Feb '21

10 Feb '21

A system test invoked by the "ovirt-master" change queue including change 113396,3 (ovirt-system-tests) failed. However, this change seems not to be the root cause for this failure. Change 113144,5 (ovirt-system-tests) that this change depends on or is based on, was detected as the cause of the testing failures. This change had been removed from the testing queue. Artifacts built from this change will not be released until either change 113144,5 (ovirt-system-tests) is fixed and this change is updated to refer to or rebased on the fixed version, or this change is modified to no longer depend on it. For further details about the change see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/ovirt-system-tests/+/#/c/113396/3 For further details about the change that seems to be the root cause behind the testing failures see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/ovirt-system-tests/+/#/c/113144/5 For failed test results see: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/28117/

1 0

oVirt infra daily report - unstable production jobs - 1462
by jenkins＠jenkins.phx.ovirt.org 09 Feb '21

09 Feb '21

Good morning! Attached is the HTML page with the jenkins status report. You can see it also here: - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/system_jenkins-report/1462//artifact/exported… Cheers, Jenkins

1 0