- Infra - oVirt List Archives

[Attention] Jenkins maintenance today(24/06/2016 01:00 AM TLV)
by Nadav Goldin 24 Jun '16

24 Jun '16

Hi, As part of an infrastructure upgrade, in approximately one hour at 01:00 AM TLV, http://jenkins.ovirt.org will be shut down for maintenance, expected downtime is 15 minutes. Patches sent during the downtime will be checked afterwards, patches sent around 40 minutes prior to the downtime might not get checked. If patches you sent did not trigger CI, you can login after the downtime and re-trigger them manually. Thanks, Nadav.

1 1

[JIRA] (OVIRT-608) [URGENT] Half of the Jenkins slaves are offline
by Nadav Goldin (oVirt JIRA) 23 Jun '16

23 Jun '16

[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-608?page=com.atlassian.jira.p… ] Nadav Goldin commented on OVIRT-608: ------------------------------------ quick check - all disconnected VMs were disconnected on purpose to reduce load. 22 VMs were disconnected in order to reduce load, most of them by [~dcaroest] last week, not sure how it was calculated. 2 BM slaves are offeline, most likely they lost their IP because of DHCP problem. > [URGENT] Half of the Jenkins slaves are offline > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: OVIRT-608 > URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-608 > Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy > Issue Type: By-EMAIL > Reporter: sbonazzo > Assignee: infra > > Please check what happened, 24 jenkins slaves are down right now. > -- > Sandro Bonazzola > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. > See how it works at redhat.com -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v1000.98.4#100004)

1 0

[JIRA] (OVIRT-608) [URGENT] Half of the Jenkins slaves are offline
by Nadav Goldin (oVirt JIRA) 23 Jun '16

23 Jun '16

[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-608?page=com.atlassian.jira.p… ] Nadav Goldin commented on OVIRT-608: ------------------------------------ During the evening I tried creating a snapshot of the Jenkins VM, which surprisingly caused the entire storage domain to slow down, the snapshot failed, and halted the Jenkins VM for a few minutes, I'll check if this might have disconnected more slaves than we intended. . > [URGENT] Half of the Jenkins slaves are offline > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: OVIRT-608 > URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-608 > Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy > Issue Type: By-EMAIL > Reporter: sbonazzo > Assignee: infra > > Please check what happened, 24 jenkins slaves are down right now. > -- > Sandro Bonazzola > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. > See how it works at redhat.com -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v1000.98.4#100004)

1 0

[JIRA] (OVIRT-608) [URGENT] Half of the Jenkins slaves are offline
by eyal edri [Administrator] (oVirt JIRA) 23 Jun '16

23 Jun '16

[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-608?page=com.atlassian.jira.p… ] eyal edri [Administrator] commented on OVIRT-608: ------------------------------------------------- Some of the slaves are offline for a reason. We have storage overload that can risk the stability of the entire DC, and until we won't move to use local disk storage we can't keep all the slaves running all the time. Having said that, if there something critical, we can start a few more vms to unlock a critical fix. On Jun 23, 2016 9:49 PM, "sbonazzo (oVirt JIRA)" < jira(a)ovirt-jira.atlassian.net> wrote: sbonazzo created OVIRT-608: ------------------------------ Summary: [URGENT] Half of the Jenkins slaves are offline Key: OVIRT-608 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-608 Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy Issue Type: By-EMAIL Reporter: sbonazzo Assignee: infra Please check what happened, 24 jenkins slaves are down right now. -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v1000.98.4#100004) > [URGENT] Half of the Jenkins slaves are offline > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: OVIRT-608 > URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-608 > Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy > Issue Type: By-EMAIL > Reporter: sbonazzo > Assignee: infra > > Please check what happened, 24 jenkins slaves are down right now. > -- > Sandro Bonazzola > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. > See how it works at redhat.com -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v1000.98.4#100004)

1 0

Re: [JIRA] (OVIRT-608) [URGENT] Half of the Jenkins slaves are offline
by Eyal Edri 23 Jun '16

23 Jun '16

Some of the slaves are offline for a reason. We have storage overload that can risk the stability of the entire DC, and until we won't move to use local disk storage we can't keep all the slaves running all the time. Having said that, if there something critical, we can start a few more vms to unlock a critical fix. On Jun 23, 2016 9:49 PM, "sbonazzo (oVirt JIRA)" < jira(a)ovirt-jira.atlassian.net> wrote: sbonazzo created OVIRT-608: ------------------------------ Summary: [URGENT] Half of the Jenkins slaves are offline Key: OVIRT-608 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-608 Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy Issue Type: By-EMAIL Reporter: sbonazzo Assignee: infra Please check what happened, 24 jenkins slaves are down right now. -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v1000.98.4#100004) _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

1 0

[JIRA] (OVIRT-608) [URGENT] Half of the Jenkins slaves are offline
by sbonazzo (oVirt JIRA) 23 Jun '16

23 Jun '16

sbonazzo created OVIRT-608: ------------------------------ Summary: [URGENT] Half of the Jenkins slaves are offline Key: OVIRT-608 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-608 Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy Issue Type: By-EMAIL Reporter: sbonazzo Assignee: infra Please check what happened, 24 jenkins slaves are down right now. -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v1000.98.4#100004)

1 0

planned restart of ci-templates-repo.phx.ovirt.org and glance.phx.ovirt.org
by Evgheni Dereveanchin 23 Jun '16

23 Jun '16

Hello everyone, I'll restart these two VMs to move them to the new oVirt cluster: ci-templates-repo.phx.ovirt.org glance.phx.ovirt.org The first VM is used by lago. If any jobs fail due to template unavailability please restart them. If you find any persisting issues please let me know. Regards, Evgheni Dereveanchin

1 0

[ANN] oVirt 4.0.0 Final Release is now available
by Sandro Bonazzola 23 Jun '16

23 Jun '16

The oVirt Project is pleased to announce today the general availability of oVirt 4.0.0. This release is available now for: * Fedora 23 (tech preview) * Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.2 or later * CentOS Linux (or similar) 7.2 or later This release supports Hypervisor Hosts running: * Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.2 or later * CentOS Linux (or similar) 7.2 or later * Fedora 23 (tech preview) * oVirt Next Generation Node 4.0 Please take a look at our community page[1] to know how to ask questions and interact with developers and users. All issues or bugs should be reported via oVirt Bugzilla[2]. See the release notes [3] for installation / upgrade instructions and a list of new features and bugs fixed. Notes: * A new oVirt Live ISO will be available soon. [4] * A new oVirt Next Generation Node will be available soon [4]. * A new oVirt Engine Appliance will be available soon. * A new oVirt Guest Tools ISO is already available [4]. * Mirrors[5] might need up to one day to synchronize. Additional Resources: * Read more about the oVirt 4.0.0 release highlights: http://www.ovirt.org/release/4.0.0/ * Get more oVirt Project updates on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ovirt * Check out the latest project news on the oVirt blog: http://www.ovirt.org/blog/ [1] https://www.ovirt.org/community/ [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?classification=oVirt [3] http://www.ovirt.org/release/4.0.0/ [4] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.0/iso/ [5] http://www.ovirt.org/Repository_mirrors#Current_mirrors -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

1 0

[JIRA] (OVIRT-607) sort out jobs which didn't move to std ci
by eyal edri [Administrator] (oVirt JIRA) 23 Jun '16

23 Jun '16

eyal edri [Administrator] created OVIRT-607: ----------------------------------------------- Summary: sort out jobs which didn't move to std ci Key: OVIRT-607 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-607 Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: eyal edri [Administrator] Assignee: infra http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/386625 The filtered list which doesn't include projects who doesn't need to move, which are using a 'rel-eng' kind of building.. http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/386628 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v1000.98.4#100004)

1 0

Re: Change in ovirt-wgt[master]: Correct path to QEMU GA MSI files
by Yedidyah Bar David 23 Jun '16

23 Jun '16

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Jenkins CI <gerrit2(a)gerrit.ovirt.org> wrote: > Jenkins CI has posted comments on this change. > > Change subject: Correct path to QEMU GA MSI files > ...................................................................... > > > Patch Set 3: > > Build Failed > > http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-wgt_master_create-rpms-fc23-x86_64_creat… : FAILURE root.log has: DEBUG util.py:417: http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/fc23/noarch/nsis-s…: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download. Suggestion: run yum --enablerepo=ovirt-master-snapshot clean metadata No idea what above means, so tried to manually install it on f23: [MIRROR] nsis-simple-service-plugin-1.30-1.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 24a4a7e8aa59fe5f4ec59c868cad6aa5f499ee4147282d567bfe3544fba01075(sha256) Expected: f31f377d70f49f09862cd75552645de9ff4969b48fcb7ab226d4fe3930220744(sha256) Any idea? -- Didi

3 4