- Infra - oVirt List Archives

uploading a python filetype to wiki
by Moran Goldboim 16 Jan '12

16 Jan '12

I'm trying to upload a python file to the wiki - an example on how to use python sdk, unfortunately i can't do it: Permitted file types: png, gif, jpg, jpeg, odp, odt, ods, pdf, jnlp, vsd. is there a way we can make it happen, if not where would be the appropriate place to put it in. Moran.

3 3

oVirt Weekly Sync Meeting Minutes and Logs aren't published on wiki nor sent
by Moran Goldboim 16 Jan '12

16 Jan '12

latest meeting minutes weren't sent nor published on wiki, please look into it. Moran.

3 2

git:// on gerrit
by Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden 15 Jan '12

15 Jan '12

Hello, Yesterday xTs_w pointed out on IRC that git:// is no longer working. Was there a specific reason to disable this? Note that many guides still use this URL. Another tip to use git:// for fetching and git+ssh:// for pushing. Add the following to ~/.gitconfig: [url "git://github.com/"] insteadOf = "gh:" [url "git(a)github.com:"] pushInsteadOf = "gh:" then you can use git clone gh:user/repo. You could use something similar for ovirt: [url "git://gerrit.ovirt.org/"] insteadOf = "ovirt:" [url "gerrit.ovirt.org:"] pushInsteadOf = "ovirt:" Then git clone ovirt:ovirt-engine should work. Promoting this can also simplify instructions. With kind regards, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden

2 1

jenkins.ovirt.org
by Mike Burns 13 Jan '12

13 Jan '12

Is Jenkins ready for additional projects? Can I get an account so I can configure ovirt-node builds? How are you handling build requirements on the slave machines? I know that the ovirt-node image will have some requirements that will probably not be there otherwise. Thanks Mike

2 2

vaporizing devel@
by Karsten 'quaid' Wade 13 Jan '12

13 Jan '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The devel(a)ovirt.org mailing list was intended to serve the same purpose as arch@, and I created it initially more out of habit than anything. Now that arch@ is the active list, we're creating confusion with the vestigial list. There are only two members (myself, pmyers), one post in the archives (a repeated kmestry post), so I'm going to vaporize the list with no loss. - -- name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Architect team: Red Hat Community Architecture & Leadership uri: http://communityleadershipteam.org http://TheOpenSourceWay.org gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFPD7QM2ZIOBq0ODEERAihoAJ9wQtKUdVlodtZWNTmjRnjNvOeiIwCg4aBm 9YkJNGMSN/bgbmQOtikI+vM= =eMtG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Tagline on ovirt.org does not communicate a clear and simple message
by Stefan Hajnoczi 06 Jan '12

06 Jan '12

Hi, The tagline on ovirt.org is long and unclear: "Complete and Comprehensive Open Source Infrastructure and Management Virtualization Platform for the Data Center". "Complete and Comprehensive" is almost a tautology. "Infrastructure and Management Virtualization Platform" does not make sense, I'm not sure what a "Management Virtualization Platform" is. Something shorter would communicate what ovirt.org is about better. This tagline is used in the <h2> and <title> (shortened). It's important because this is how visitors learn what oVirt is and whether to read more. How about shortening it to, "Complete Open Source Virtualization Platform for the Data Center"? Thanks to mburns on #ovirt for directing me to infra(a)ovirt.org and board(a)ovirt.org. Stefan

1 0

Fwd: Please test git-review RPM
by Karsten 'quaid' Wade 04 Jan '12

04 Jan '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Are these useful to us? That is, are we using 'git-review' for our Gerrit instance? If so, then, yes, packages are useful to us. If yes, then we probably want to check for compatibility, and report back to Pete if we get any problems. - - Karsten - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Please test git-review RPM Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:15:46 -0700 From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev(a)redhat.com> Reply-To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> Dear All: I am thinking about packaging git-review (the real one, not Facebook's), and to that end I prepared RPMs that are to be submitted for Fedora. Before I do that, I'd like someone verify that they work. AFAIK both Gluster and OpenStack use Gerrit with git-review. These RPMs come from OpenStack source, and I am very curious if they are compatible with Gluster use, so that we can have one in Fedora. http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.noarch.rpm http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.src.rpm Thanks and have a happy New Year, - -- Pete _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFPA5Vi2ZIOBq0ODEERAqmrAJ4veOcjfLMFKvKflEyO72T5UaH+hQCeO6dL LmgcSwfotHPNrCEY4WpPnDc= =dHSS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

smtp server for ovirt.org
by Eyal Edri 16 Dec '11

16 Dec '11

Do we have an SMTP server configured for oVirt? I'm starting to configure the Jenkins CI server and it requires an SMTP server for sending alerts via email. Eyal.

3 3

git for server config tracking
by Karsten 'quaid' Wade 14 Dec '11

14 Dec '11

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Today I setup local git repos on linode01.ovirt.org for tracking the services' configurations: Mailman, Wordpress, Supybot, MediaWiki, and /etc. Hopefully my idea here is sane. If it's not, help me make it sane. :) It's clearly not a solution equivalent to Puppet or Chef, but I'm not trying to add a new service :) I'm trying to make sure we have a handle on where we are right now in a lightweight, it's-just-done way. In /root/git: ls -l total 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Dec 14 18:37 ovirt-infra-etc -> /etc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Dec 14 18:21 ovirt-infra-mailman -> /usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/ lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Dec 14 16:51 ovirt-infra-mediawiki -> /var/www/html/w/ lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Dec 14 16:54 ovirt-infra-supybot -> /var/lib/supybot/ lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Dec 14 16:52 ovirt-infra-wordpress -> /usr/share/wordpress/ - -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 172 Dec 14 16:50 REPOS Each of the symlinked directories now was initialized as a git repo. Then I created this tree as the central origin: ls -l /usr/local/git_root/ total 20 drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Dec 14 18:38 ovirt-infra-etc.git drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Dec 14 18:23 ovirt-infra-mailman.git drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Dec 14 18:30 ovirt-infra-mediawiki.git drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Dec 14 18:33 ovirt-infra-supybot.git drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Dec 14 17:09 ovirt-infra-wordpress.git I'm working on the wiki page about how it's setup, but essentially I did this for each repository: mkdir foo-project.git cd foo-project.git/ git --bare init git config core.sharedrepository 1 git config receive.denyNonFastforwards true find objects -type d -exec chmod 02770 {} \; cd /root/git/foo-project.git git remote add origin /usr/local/git_root/foo_project.git git push origin master git checkout origin/master git branch -f master origin/master git checkout master All of this won't leave any of the servers and be without root:root ownership because these git repositories contain actual passwords for all these services. - - Karsten - -- name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Architect team: Red Hat Community Architecture & Leadership uri: http://communityleadershipteam.org http://TheOpenSourceWay.org gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFO6TWW2ZIOBq0ODEERAjgsAKDAbQrHDWl/hji0gSBIkGVwoyYLPgCdE8oI 7+5N9jHC2pzs45I2tsO+UHQ= =Njkr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: discussion tab (was [Engine-devel] API design and plan)
by Itamar Heim 13 Dec '11

13 Dec '11

moving discussion to infra list - is there a way to disable the discussion tabs on the wikis if people prefer mailing lists to discuss item to avoid confusing people? On 12/13/2011 03:02 PM, Jon Choate wrote: .... >>>> Is there a bias towards using the mailing list and against the >>>> discussion tab on the wiki page when discussing wiki pages? Just >>>> want to >>>> know. I'm used to commenting on wikis on the discussion page. >>> >>> mailing list - shouldn't be. >>> wiki - may be lost on the larger audience - I think discussing on >>> the >>> mailing list makes more sense since many don't subscribe to the >>> wiki >>> pages after their first review from when it was published. >> >> No offense, but the only thing which is more broken than email for >> discussing such things is a wiki discussion (mailing list at least >> pushes changes by default. has clients to manage replies by threads, >> responses can be sent concurrently etc). >> > No offense taken, different tools work better for different groups of people. If we do not want to use the discussion tabs, is there a way to get rid of them so we don't have people posting comments there?

1 0