12:41 a.m.
Hi Sandro,
It seems that with
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/commit/f3286b2e1f2871978d054250556f1b...
all refference to Gluster & Hyperconverged is removed from the website.
Can you clarify the situation with Hyperconverged deployments ?
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
1:42 a.m.
Il giorno ven 4 feb 2022 alle ore 08:19 Strahil Nikolov <
hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com> ha scritto:
Hi Sandro,
It seems that with
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/commit/f3286b2e1f2871978d054250556f1b...
all refference to Gluster & Hyperconverged is removed from the website.
Can you clarify the situation with Hyperconverged deployments ?
Hi, the Gluster & Hyperconverged deployment moved outside the documentation
section on the website: https://ovirt.org/dropped/gluster-hyperconverged/
as it's outdated and unmaintained.
GlusterFS is being deprecated for usage on storage domains: Bug 2016359
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016359> - Deprecate usage of
GlusterFS for Storage Domains
And the hyperconverged solution for oVirt is based on GlusterFS, so it's
being deprecated as well.
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo(a)redhat.com
<https://www.redhat.com/>
*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to
answer this email out of your office hours.*
8:18 a.m.
This is the first time I hear that hyperconverged won't be supported in the
short future.
Since Ceph is supported by oVirt, wouldn't it be possible to use this for
hyperconverged deployments?
We are in the planning phase to buy servers for a typical 3 Gluster/Hosts
nodes deployment. Should we rethink it?
Guillaume Pavese
Ingénieur Système et Réseau
Interactiv-Group
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 4:49 PM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Il giorno ven 4 feb 2022 alle ore 08:19 Strahil Nikolov <
hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com> ha scritto:
> Hi Sandro,
>
> It seems that with
>
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/commit/f3286b2e1f2871978d054250556f1b...
> all refference to Gluster & Hyperconverged is removed from the website.
>
>
> Can you clarify the situation with Hyperconverged deployments ?
>
Hi, the Gluster & Hyperconverged deployment moved outside the
documentation section on the website:
https://ovirt.org/dropped/gluster-hyperconverged/ as it's outdated and
unmaintained.
GlusterFS is being deprecated for usage on storage domains: Bug 2016359
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016359> - Deprecate usage
of GlusterFS for Storage Domains
And the hyperconverged solution for oVirt is based on GlusterFS, so it's
being deprecated as well.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
>
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo(a)redhat.com
<https://www.redhat.com/>
*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to
answer this email out of your office hours.*
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/KEBL4DVAQJZ...
--
Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes (ci-après le “message”) sont
établis à l’intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels.
Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le détruire et d’en avertir
immédiatement l’expéditeur. Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a
sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle,
est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse. L’internet ne permettant pas
d’assurer l’intégrité de ce message . Interactiv-group (et ses filiales)
décline(nt) toute responsabilité au titre de ce message, dans l’hypothèse
ou il aurait été modifié. IT, ES, UK.
<https://interactiv-group.com/disclaimer.html>
1:06 p.m.
So,we deprecate GlusterFS ? I understand it for RHV , but for oVirt, where support was
never an option, it doesn't make sense ?
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:43, Sandro Bonazzola<sbonazzo(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Il giorno ven 4 feb 2022 alle ore 08:19 Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com> ha
scritto:
Hi Sandro,
It seems that with
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/commit/f3286b2e1f2871978d054250556f1b...
all refference to Gluster & Hyperconverged is removed from the website.
Can you clarify the situation with Hyperconverged deployments ?
Hi, the Gluster & Hyperconverged deployment moved outside the documentation section on
the website: https://ovirt.org/dropped/gluster-hyperconverged/ as it's outdated and
unmaintained.GlusterFS is being deprecated for usage on storage
domains: Bug 2016359 - Deprecate usage of GlusterFS for Storage DomainsAnd the
hyperconverged solution for oVirt is based on GlusterFS, so it's being deprecated as
well.
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA
sbonazzo(a)redhat.com
| | |
|
Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email
out of your office hours.
9:43 a.m.
Wait a minute.
Use of GlusterFS as a storage backend is now deperecated and will be
removed in a future update?
What are those who's deployments have GlusterFS as their storage
backend supposed to use as a replacement?
I'm feeling vibes of the SPICE deprecation all over again..... but
moving all of the VM storage data isn't a quick process, and I don't
want to move it to something else that will also be depercated by a
future RH whim....
-Patrick Hibbs
On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 08:42 +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il giorno ven 4 feb 2022 alle ore 08:19 Strahil Nikolov
<hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com> ha scritto:
> Hi Sandro,
>
> It seems that with
>
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/commit/f3286b2e1f2871978d054250556f1b...
> all refference to Gluster & Hyperconverged is removed from the
> website.
>
>
> Can you clarify the situation with Hyperconverged deployments ?
>
Hi, the Gluster & Hyperconverged deployment moved outside the
documentation section on the
website: https://ovirt.org/dropped/gluster-hyperconverged/ as it's
outdated and unmaintained.
GlusterFS is being deprecated for usage on storage
domains: Bug 2016359 - Deprecate usage of GlusterFS for Storage
Domains
And the hyperconverged solution for oVirt is based on GlusterFS, so
it's being deprecated as well.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/KEBL4DVAQJZ...
5:37 p.m.
I have had a lot of problems with gluster in my HCO environment, so was already leanings
towards a storage migration at some point this year. My own plan is to use 2x Synology NAS
SA3400 devices and put them into a HA pair that then exposes the storage as NFS (or
whatever else I want it exposed as).
I was planning on this migration before I saw the notes about Gluster support being
officially dropped, and I would be happy to provide more insight to the list on how that
progresses. I have a lot of experience with Synology, and they are a low-cost option for
highly available storage.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
------- Original Message -------
On Saturday, February 5th, 2022 at 10:43 AM, Patrick Hibbs <hibbsncc1701(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Wait a minute.
Use of GlusterFS as a storage backend is now deperecated and will be
removed in a future update?
What are those who's deployments have GlusterFS as their storage
backend supposed to use as a replacement?
I'm feeling vibes of the SPICE deprecation all over again.....
but moving all of the VM storage data isn't a quick process, and I don't want to
move it to something else that will also be depercated by a future RH whim....
-Patrick Hibbs
On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 08:42 +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il giorno ven 4 feb 2022 alle ore 08:19 Strahil Nikolov
<hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com> ha scritto:
>
> > Hi Sandro,
> >
> > It seems that with
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/commit/f3286b2e1f2871978d054250556f1b...
all refference to Gluster & Hyperconverged is removed from the website.
> >
> > Can you clarify the situation with Hyperconverged
deployments ?
>
> Hi, the Gluster & Hyperconverged deployment moved outside
the documentation section on the
website: https://ovirt.org/dropped/gluster-hyperconverged/ as it's outdated and
unmaintained.GlusterFS is being deprecated for usage on storage
domains: Bug 2016359 - Deprecate usage of GlusterFS for Storage DomainsAnd the
hyperconverged solution for oVirt is based on GlusterFS, so it's being deprecated as
well.
>
> > Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
> oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/KEBL4DVAQJZ...
9:43 a.m.
I quote you from the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016359
Sandro Bonazzola 2022-02-07 06:42:27 UTC
(In reply to Nir Soffer from comment #4)
Is this relevant to oVirt? Do we plan to deprecate Gluster usage in oVirt?
The Gluster upstream website doesn't mention any intention to stop the development so
I think oVirt is not affected by RHGS EOL.
So the question now is what changed???
3:55 p.m.
Ceph native usage (no iscis's or any other abstraction) will do the job and
elavate entire thing to a NEXT level.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022, 17:51 less foobar via Users <users(a)ovirt.org> wrote:
I quote you from the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016359
Sandro Bonazzola 2022-02-07 06:42:27 UTC
(In reply to Nir Soffer from comment #4)
Is this relevant to oVirt? Do we plan to deprecate Gluster usage in oVirt?
The Gluster upstream website doesn't mention any intention to stop the
development so I think oVirt is not affected by RHGS EOL.
So the question now is what changed???
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/Z3FX3VKYXJ6...
4:56 p.m.
I'm not so sure. Usually Gluster is used in Hyperconverged scenarios.CEPH is more
damanding and I would calculate my reaources several times before considering it in
Hyperconverged.
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 0:01, Leo David<leoalex(a)gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/KEA2VRL76EL...
11:59 p.m.
What advantages does ovirt in hyperconerge mode offer over using glusterfs
on a separate stack unrelated to orvirt except as a domain storage? I am
looking into moving our NFS server to a distributed redundant solution.
What is the best, most reliable, fastest solution I could build that ovirt
can use but doesn't manage or is it necessary to let ovirt manage its
domains as well
TIA
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 3:00 PM Strahil Nikolov via Users <users(a)ovirt.org>
wrote:
I'm not so sure. Usually Gluster is used in Hyperconverged
scenarios.
CEPH is more damanding and I would calculate my reaources several times
before considering it in Hyperconverged.
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 0:01, Leo David
<leoalex(a)gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/KEA2VRL76EL...
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/Q3BDSSGI5YU...
2:19 a.m.
HCI architectured virtualisation enviroments provide quite a lot of
benefits for different implementation scenarios. From rought point of view,
they combine 3 main components in horizontal scaling out fashion ( compute,
storage, networking)
As a starting point, i think you may want to have a look on this:
https://storpool.com/blog/is-hyper-converged-infrastructure-what-you-need/
Regards,
Leo
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022, 08:00 Pascal DeMilly <pascal(a)mantra-soft.com> wrote:
What advantages does ovirt in hyperconerge mode offer over using
glusterfs
on a separate stack unrelated to orvirt except as a domain storage? I am
looking into moving our NFS server to a distributed redundant solution.
What is the best, most reliable, fastest solution I could build that ovirt
can use but doesn't manage or is it necessary to let ovirt manage its
domains as well
TIA
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 3:00 PM Strahil Nikolov via Users <users(a)ovirt.org>
wrote:
> I'm not so sure. Usually Gluster is used in Hyperconverged scenarios.
> CEPH is more damanding and I would calculate my reaources several times
> before considering it in Hyperconverged.
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 0:01, Leo David
> <leoalex(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/KEA2VRL76EL...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/Q3BDSSGI5YU...
>
6:14 a.m.
I'm currently testing ceph with proxmox. Its taking 50Gb of ram for 21 OSDs so yeah
lets not compare it to gluster
11:37 a.m.
Wait a minute.
Use of GlusterFS as a storage backend is now deperecated and will be
removed in a future update?
What are those who's deployments have GlusterFS as their storage
backend supposed to use as a replacement?
They are to fully understand the opportunities and risks that come from a
community open source project:
1. Risk: the project can die at any time from lack of support
2. Opportunity: if you help developing a sufficiently great alternative it may be taken
aboard
I'm feeling vibes of the SPICE deprecation all over again.....
but
moving all of the VM storage data isn't a quick process, and I don't
want to move it to something else that will also be depercated by a
future RH whim....
If you want to be safe from "a future RH whim" (it's the community, really,
and your organization is free to invest more than RH), you need to look for or create a
community where RH is the minority.
In short, it's somewhat unreasonable to expect others to go to unreasonable lenghts to
support you for free.
But they could have done a much better job at describing just how shaky things were.
>
> -Patrick Hibbs
>
> On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 08:42 +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
799
days inactive
809
days old
12 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
David White -
Guillaume Pavese -
Leo David -
less foobar -
Pascal DeMilly -
Patrick Hibbs -
Sandro Bonazzola -
Strahil Nikolov -
Thomas Hoberg