December 2017 - Infra - oVirt List Archives

Default assignee for bugzilla component
by Sahina Bose 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

Hi! Could you change the default assignee on Product: cockpit-ovirt Component:gdeploy to godas(a)redhat.com? thanks sahina

3 3

[JIRA] (OVIRT-1788) new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite -- need multiple firefoxes and chromium
by Daniel Belenky (oVirt JIRA) 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1512572024-12025-143 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.… ] Daniel Belenky commented on OVIRT-1788: --------------------------------------- [~gshereme(a)redhat.com] I'll be happy to assist with that > new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite -- need multiple firefoxes and chromium > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: OVIRT-1788 > URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788 > Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: OST > Reporter: Greg Sheremeta > Assignee: infra > > I'm writing a suite that does headless UI testing. One goal is to open headless firefox and actually open the UI, perform a login, make sure things look good, make sure there are no ui.log errors, etc. I'll also eventually add chromium, which can run headless now too. > The suite requires several firefox versions to be installed on the test machine, along with chromium. There are also some binary components required, geckodriver and chromedriver. These are not packaged. > Ideally the browsers can be installed to /opt/firefox55, /opt/firefox56, /opt/chromium62, etc. on the machine running the suite. So I think it makes sense to maintain a custom rpm with all of this. > Where can this rpm live? What is a reliable way to do this? (I know we want to avoid copr.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100074) ------------=_1512572024-12025-143 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html><body> <pre>[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.… ]</pre> <h3>Daniel Belenky commented on OVIRT-1788:</h3> <p>[~gshereme(a)redhat.com] I'll be happy to assist with that</p> <blockquote><h3>new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite — need multiple firefoxes and chromium</h3> <pre> Key: OVIRT-1788 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788 Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy Issue Type: Improvement Components: OST Reporter: Greg Sheremeta Assignee: infra</pre> <p>I'm writing a suite that does headless UI testing. One goal is to open headless firefox and actually open the UI, perform a login, make sure things look good, make sure there are no ui.log errors, etc. I'll also eventually add chromium, which can run headless now too. The suite requires several firefox versions to be installed on the test machine, along with chromium. There are also some binary components required, geckodriver and chromedriver. These are not packaged. Ideally the browsers can be installed to /opt/firefox55, /opt/firefox56, /opt/chromium62, etc. on the machine running the suite. So I think it makes sense to maintain a custom rpm with all of this. Where can this rpm live? What is a reliable way to do this? (I know we want to avoid copr.)</p></blockquote> <p>— This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100074)</p> <img src="https://u4043402.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/open?upn=i5TMWGV99amJbNxJpSp2-2BJ33BSM3…" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="height:1px !important;width:1px !important;border-width:0 !important;margin-top:0 !important;margin-bottom:0 !important;margin-right:0 !important;margin-left:0 !important;padding-top:0 !important;padding-bottom:0 !important;padding-right:0 !important;padding-left:0 !important;"/> </body></html> ------------=_1512572024-12025-143--

1 0

[CQ]: 85136,3 (ovirt-engine) failed "ovirt-master" system tests
by oVirt Jenkins 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

Change 85136,3 (ovirt-engine) is probably the reason behind recent system test failures in the "ovirt-master" change queue and needs to be fixed. This change had been removed from the testing queue. Artifacts build from this change will not be released until it is fixed. For further details about the change see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/85136/3 For failed test results see: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/4313/

1 0

[JIRA] (OVIRT-1788) new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite -- need multiple firefoxes and chromium
by Greg Sheremeta (oVirt JIRA) 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.… ] Greg Sheremeta commented on OVIRT-1788: --------------------------------------- Ok -- I'll need your assistance setting it up. I have no idea how to pull them, start them, or cache them :) > new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite -- need multiple firefoxes and chromium > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: OVIRT-1788 > URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788 > Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: OST > Reporter: Greg Sheremeta > Assignee: infra > > I'm writing a suite that does headless UI testing. One goal is to open headless firefox and actually open the UI, perform a login, make sure things look good, make sure there are no ui.log errors, etc. I'll also eventually add chromium, which can run headless now too. > The suite requires several firefox versions to be installed on the test machine, along with chromium. There are also some binary components required, geckodriver and chromedriver. These are not packaged. > Ideally the browsers can be installed to /opt/firefox55, /opt/firefox56, /opt/chromium62, etc. on the machine running the suite. So I think it makes sense to maintain a custom rpm with all of this. > Where can this rpm live? What is a reliable way to do this? (I know we want to avoid copr.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100074)

1 0

[JIRA] (OVIRT-1788) new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite -- need multiple firefoxes and chromium
by Barak Korren (oVirt JIRA) 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1512568585-25653-223 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.… ] Barak Korren commented on OVIRT-1788: ------------------------------------- [~gshereme(a)redhat.com] awesome! so we don`t need to make our own, just use theirs and make sure they are cached properly between runs... > new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite -- need multiple firefoxes and chromium > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: OVIRT-1788 > URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788 > Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: OST > Reporter: Greg Sheremeta > Assignee: infra > > I'm writing a suite that does headless UI testing. One goal is to open headless firefox and actually open the UI, perform a login, make sure things look good, make sure there are no ui.log errors, etc. I'll also eventually add chromium, which can run headless now too. > The suite requires several firefox versions to be installed on the test machine, along with chromium. There are also some binary components required, geckodriver and chromedriver. These are not packaged. > Ideally the browsers can be installed to /opt/firefox55, /opt/firefox56, /opt/chromium62, etc. on the machine running the suite. So I think it makes sense to maintain a custom rpm with all of this. > Where can this rpm live? What is a reliable way to do this? (I know we want to avoid copr.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100074) ------------=_1512568585-25653-223 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html><body> <pre>[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.… ]</pre> <h3>Barak Korren commented on OVIRT-1788:</h3> <p>[~gshereme(a)redhat.com] awesome! so we don`t need to make our own, just use theirs and make sure they are cached properly between runs…</p> <blockquote><h3>new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite — need multiple firefoxes and chromium</h3> <pre> Key: OVIRT-1788 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788 Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy Issue Type: Improvement Components: OST Reporter: Greg Sheremeta Assignee: infra</pre> <p>I'm writing a suite that does headless UI testing. One goal is to open headless firefox and actually open the UI, perform a login, make sure things look good, make sure there are no ui.log errors, etc. I'll also eventually add chromium, which can run headless now too. The suite requires several firefox versions to be installed on the test machine, along with chromium. There are also some binary components required, geckodriver and chromedriver. These are not packaged. Ideally the browsers can be installed to /opt/firefox55, /opt/firefox56, /opt/chromium62, etc. on the machine running the suite. So I think it makes sense to maintain a custom rpm with all of this. Where can this rpm live? What is a reliable way to do this? (I know we want to avoid copr.)</p></blockquote> <p>— This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100074)</p> <img src="https://u4043402.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/open?upn=i5TMWGV99amJbNxJpSp2-2BJ33BSM3…" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="height:1px !important;width:1px !important;border-width:0 !important;margin-top:0 !important;margin-bottom:0 !important;margin-right:0 !important;margin-left:0 !important;padding-top:0 !important;padding-bottom:0 !important;padding-right:0 !important;padding-left:0 !important;"/> </body></html> ------------=_1512568585-25653-223--

1 0

[JIRA] (OVIRT-1793) PHX repo mirror inconsistent
by Evgheni Dereveanchin (oVirt JIRA) 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1793?page=com.atlassian.jira.… ] Evgheni Dereveanchin reassigned OVIRT-1793: ------------------------------------------- Assignee: Daniel Belenky (was: infra) > PHX repo mirror inconsistent > ---------------------------- > > Key: OVIRT-1793 > URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1793 > Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Evgheni Dereveanchin > Assignee: Daniel Belenky > > The [infra-docs_master_check-merged-el7-x86_64|http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/infr…] job failed due to a missing RPM on the mirror that is present in the index: > 12:13:44 http://mirrors.phx.ovirt.org/repos/yum/epel-el7/base/f/fontawesome-fonts-4.…: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found > We may need to fix this mirror or disable it for this job if this package is filtered out to conserve disk space. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100074)

1 0

[JIRA] (OVIRT-1788) new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite -- need multiple firefoxes and chromium
by Greg Sheremeta (oVirt JIRA) 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1512558689-17283-163 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.… ] Greg Sheremeta commented on OVIRT-1788: --------------------------------------- They provide containers already: https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/docker-selenium Can we use those somehow? > new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite -- need multiple firefoxes and chromium > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: OVIRT-1788 > URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788 > Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: OST > Reporter: Greg Sheremeta > Assignee: infra > > I'm writing a suite that does headless UI testing. One goal is to open headless firefox and actually open the UI, perform a login, make sure things look good, make sure there are no ui.log errors, etc. I'll also eventually add chromium, which can run headless now too. > The suite requires several firefox versions to be installed on the test machine, along with chromium. There are also some binary components required, geckodriver and chromedriver. These are not packaged. > Ideally the browsers can be installed to /opt/firefox55, /opt/firefox56, /opt/chromium62, etc. on the machine running the suite. So I think it makes sense to maintain a custom rpm with all of this. > Where can this rpm live? What is a reliable way to do this? (I know we want to avoid copr.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100074) ------------=_1512558689-17283-163 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html><body> <pre>[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.… ]</pre> <h3>Greg Sheremeta commented on OVIRT-1788:</h3> <p>They provide containers already: <a href="https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/docker-selenium">https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/docker-selenium</a></p> <p>Can we use those somehow?</p> <blockquote><h3>new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite — need multiple firefoxes and chromium</h3> <pre> Key: OVIRT-1788 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788 Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy Issue Type: Improvement Components: OST Reporter: Greg Sheremeta Assignee: infra</pre> <p>I'm writing a suite that does headless UI testing. One goal is to open headless firefox and actually open the UI, perform a login, make sure things look good, make sure there are no ui.log errors, etc. I'll also eventually add chromium, which can run headless now too. The suite requires several firefox versions to be installed on the test machine, along with chromium. There are also some binary components required, geckodriver and chromedriver. These are not packaged. Ideally the browsers can be installed to /opt/firefox55, /opt/firefox56, /opt/chromium62, etc. on the machine running the suite. So I think it makes sense to maintain a custom rpm with all of this. Where can this rpm live? What is a reliable way to do this? (I know we want to avoid copr.)</p></blockquote> <p>— This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100074)</p> <img src="https://u4043402.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/open?upn=i5TMWGV99amJbNxJpSp2-2BJ33BSM3…" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="height:1px !important;width:1px !important;border-width:0 !important;margin-top:0 !important;margin-bottom:0 !important;margin-right:0 !important;margin-left:0 !important;padding-top:0 !important;padding-bottom:0 !important;padding-right:0 !important;padding-left:0 !important;"/> </body></html> ------------=_1512558689-17283-163--

1 0

Build failed in Jenkins: system-sync_mirrors-centos-updates-el7-x86_64 #1053
by jenkins＠jenkins.phx.ovirt.org 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

See <http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/system-sync_mirrors-centos-updates-el7-x86_64/…> ------------------------------------------ Started by timer [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on mirrors.phx.ovirt.org (mirrors) in workspace <http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/system-sync_mirrors-centos-updates-el7-x86_64/…> > git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=10 Fetching changes from the remote Git repository > git config remote.origin.url http://gerrit.ovirt.org/jenkins.git # timeout=10 Cleaning workspace > git rev-parse --verify HEAD # timeout=10 Resetting working tree > git reset --hard # timeout=10 > git clean -fdx # timeout=10 Pruning obsolete local branches Fetching upstream changes from http://gerrit.ovirt.org/jenkins.git > git --version # timeout=10 > git fetch --tags --progress http://gerrit.ovirt.org/jenkins.git +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* --prune > git rev-parse origin/master^{commit} # timeout=10 Checking out Revision bd4aab54d0c2d8ee1df391e2bcc82634ff73ff01 (origin/master) > git config core.sparsecheckout # timeout=10 > git checkout -f bd4aab54d0c2d8ee1df391e2bcc82634ff73ff01 Commit message: "ovirt-wgt: Exclude Fedora in 4.2 branch" > git rev-list bd4aab54d0c2d8ee1df391e2bcc82634ff73ff01 # timeout=10 [system-sync_mirrors-centos-updates-el7-x86_64] $ /bin/bash -xe /tmp/jenkins4348173935222386919.sh + jenkins/scripts/mirror_mgr.sh resync_yum_mirror centos-updates-el7 x86_64 jenkins/data/mirrors-reposync.conf Checking if mirror needs a resync Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/reposync", line 343, in <module> main() File "/usr/bin/reposync", line 175, in main my.doRepoSetup() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 681, in doRepoSetup return self._getRepos(thisrepo, True) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 721, in _getRepos self._repos.doSetup(thisrepo) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/repos.py", line 157, in doSetup self.retrieveAllMD() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/repos.py", line 88, in retrieveAllMD dl = repo._async and repo._commonLoadRepoXML(repo) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 1465, in _commonLoadRepoXML local = self.cachedir + '/repomd.xml' File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 774, in <lambda> cachedir = property(lambda self: self._dirGetAttr('cachedir')) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 757, in _dirGetAttr self.dirSetup() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 735, in dirSetup self._dirSetupMkdir_p(dir) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 712, in _dirSetupMkdir_p raise Errors.RepoError, msg yum.Errors.RepoError: Error making cache directory: /home/jenkins/mirrors_cache/centos-updates-el7 error was: [Errno 17] File exists: '/home/jenkins/mirrors_cache/centos-updates-el7' Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure

1 1

[CQ]: 85067, 3 (ovirt-imageio) failed "ovirt-master" system tests, but isn't the failure root cause
by oVirt Jenkins 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

A system test invoked by the "ovirt-master" change queue including change 85067,3 (ovirt-imageio) failed. However, this change seems not to be the root cause for this failure. Change 85049,2 (ovirt-imageio) that this change depends on or is based on, was detected as the cause of the testing failures. This change had been removed from the testing queue. Artifacts built from this change will not be released until either change 85049,2 (ovirt-imageio) is fixed and this change is updated to refer to or rebased on the fixed version, or this change is modified to no longer depend on it. For further details about the change see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/85067/3 For further details about the change that seems to be the root cause behind the testing failures see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/85049/2 For failed test results see: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/4305/

1 0

[CQ]: 85067, 3 (ovirt-imageio) failed "ovirt-master" system tests, but isn't the failure root cause
by oVirt Jenkins 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

A system test invoked by the "ovirt-master" change queue including change 85067,3 (ovirt-imageio) failed. However, this change seems not to be the root cause for this failure. Change 85049,2 (ovirt-imageio) that this change depends on or is based on, was detected as the cause of the testing failures. This change had been removed from the testing queue. Artifacts built from this change will not be released until either change 85049,2 (ovirt-imageio) is fixed and this change is updated to refer to or rebased on the fixed version, or this change is modified to no longer depend on it. For further details about the change see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/85067/3 For further details about the change that seems to be the root cause behind the testing failures see: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/85049/2 For failed test results see: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/4303/

1 0