[ovirt] #17: Backups - what, where, when
by ovirt
#17: Backups - what, where, when
-----------------------+------------------------
Reporter: quaid | Owner: infra@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: oVirt 3.2
Component: General | Version: Production
Severity: High | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
-----------------------+------------------------
We need to work out solutions for:
* OpenShift backup
* Other servers
* Where can backups live?
* What can be backed-up on borrowed community space?
* What should be encrypted
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/ovirt/ticket/17>
ovirt <http://www.ovirt.org/>
oVirt - virtualization made easy.
10 years, 5 months
Request for Fedora 20 VM
by Sandro Bonazzola
Hi,
Fedora 20 Alpha has been released and can be downloaded from http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease.
I think it's time to start running our tests and build nightly also on Fedora 20 in order to discover
possible compatibility issues.
Can infra provide a Fedora 20 VM for jenkins use?
Thanks,
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
11 years, 2 months
Installing a vm on alterway02.ovirt.org
by Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
I'm trying to install a VM on alterway02.ovirt.org, but the network
seems very unreliable. I gave it 31.15.26.5 and I'm not sure if it's our
host, but I often see 89.31.150.107 reply:
>From 89.31.150.107: icmp_seq=6 Destination Host Unreachable
This results into some packet loss / errors:
23 packets transmitted, 15 received, +8 errors, 34% packet loss, time
22026ms
I thought we could use 31.15.26.1 to 31.15.26.10 so I didn't think I'd
steal an IP from another machine. I also tried another IP (31.15.26.6),
but that gives the same result. Is there anything I'm doing wrong?
11 years, 2 months
fake vdsm repo on oVirt
by Tomas Jelinek
Hi all,
I would like to ask you to create a new repo on ovirt to host the fake VDSM project [1].
The ovirt-vdsmfake would be a good name for it. I would say it should be enough to move the project
from github to ovirt (e.g. fork it) and not replicate the changes back as that project does not make
much sense alone.
I would be the maintainer of it for now.
Thank you,
Tomas
[1] https://github.com/lspevak/ovirt-vdsmfake
11 years, 2 months
[ATN] vdsm yum install is missing pkg for centos & f18
by Eyal Edri
fyi,
as part of adding more verification jobs on vdsm, infra recently added a new job [1] that installs vdsm.
currently that job is working only on f19 and fails on f18 and centos64[2]:
Are there any plans to fix this soon? how users are supposed to install vdsm if those pkg are missing?
Eyal.
[1]http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_install_rpm_sanity_gerrit/label=fedor...
[2]
centos:
---> Package lm_sensors-libs.x86_64 0:3.1.1-17.el6 will be installed
---> Package perl-hivex.x86_64 0:1.3.3-4.2.el6 will be installed
---> Package vdsm.x86_64 0:4.12.0-149.git44993c6.el6 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: selinux-policy-targeted >= 3.7.19-213 for package: vdsm-4.12.0-149.git44993c6.el6.x86_64
---> Package vdsm-hook-vhostmd.noarch 0:4.12.0-149.git44993c6.el6 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: vhostmd for package: vdsm-hook-vhostmd-4.12.0-149.git44993c6.el6.noarch
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: vdsm-hook-vhostmd-4.12.0-149.git44993c6.el6.noarch (/vdsm-hook-vhostmd-4.12.0-149.git44993c6.el6.noarch)
Requires: vhostmd
Error: Package: vdsm-4.12.0-149.git44993c6.el6.x86_64 (/vdsm-4.12.0-149.git44993c6.el6.x86_64)
Requires: selinux-policy-targeted >= 3.7.19-213
Installed: selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-195.el6_4.12.noarch (@updates)
selinux-policy-targeted = 3.7.19-195.el6_4.12
Available: selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-195.el6.noarch (base)
selinux-policy-targeted = 3.7.19-195.el6
Available: selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-195.el6_4.1.noarch (updates)
selinux-policy-targeted = 3.7.19-195.el6_4.1
Available: selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-195.el6_4.3.noarch (updates)
selinux-policy-targeted = 3.7.19-195.el6_4.3
Available: selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-195.el6_4.5.noarch (updates)
selinux-policy-targeted = 3.7.19-195.el6_4.5
Available: selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-195.el6_4.6.noarch (updates)
selinux-policy-targeted = 3.7.19-195.el6_4.6
Available: selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-195.el6_4.10.noarch (updates)
selinux-policy-targeted = 3.7.19-195.el6_4.10
f18:
--> Running transaction check
---> Package dracut.x86_64 0:024-18.git20130102.fc18 will be updated
---> Package dracut.x86_64 0:024-25.git20130205.fc18 will be an update
---> Package vdsm.x86_64 0:4.12.0-149.git44993c6.fc18 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: libvirt-daemon >= 1.0.2-1 for package: vdsm-4.12.0-149.git44993c6.fc18.x86_64
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: vdsm-4.12.0-149.git44993c6.fc18.x86_64 (/vdsm-4.12.0-149.git44993c6.fc18.x86_64)
Requires: libvirt-daemon >= 1.0.2-1
Installed: libvirt-daemon-0.10.2.7-1.fc18.x86_64 (@updates)
libvirt-daemon = 0.10.2.7-1.fc18
Available: libvirt-daemon-0.10.2.2-3.fc18.x86_64 (fedora)
libvirt-daemon = 0.10.2.2-3.fc18
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
11 years, 2 months
Fwd: Adding Vinzenz as a maintainer of ovirt-guest-agent
by Vinzenz Feenstra
seems the original message didn't reach infra@ as I can't find it in the
archives, resending...
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Barak Azulay <bazulay(a)redhat.com>
> Subject: Adding Vinzenz as a maintainer of ovirt-guest-agent
> Date: September 24, 2013 13:22:28 GMT+02:00
> To: infra(a)ovirt.org
> Cc: board(a)ovirt.org, Michal Skrivanek <mskrivan(a)redhat.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> Over the past year, Vinzenz has been the de-facto maintainer of the
> ovirt-guest-agent project, and I'm moving the reins over to him.
> I'll continue to be in the picture.
> please provide him with relevant gerrit permissions.
>
> Thanks
> Barak Azulay
11 years, 2 months
