Problemas with ovirtmgmt network used to connect VMs
by FERNANDO FREDIANI
Has anyone had problem when using the ovirtmgmt bridge to connect VMs ?
I am still facing a bizarre problem where some VMs connected to this
bridge stop passing traffic. Checking the problem further I see its mac
address stops being learned by the bridge and the problem is resolved
only with a VM reboot.
When I last saw the problem I run brctl showmacs ovirtmgmt and it shows
me the VM's mac adress with agening timer 200.19. After the VM reboot I
see the same mac with agening timer 0.00.
I don't see it in another environment where the ovirtmgmt is not used
for VMs.
Does anyone have any clue about this type of behavior ?
Fernando
7 years, 3 months
Python errors with ovirt 4.1.4
by david caughey
Hi Folks,
I'm testing out the new version with the 4.1.4 ovirt iso and am getting
errors directly after install:
Last login: Wed Aug 2 10:17:56 2017
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/runpy.py", line 162, in _run_module_as_main
"__main__", fname, loader, pkg_name)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/runpy.py", line 72, in _run_code
exec code in run_globals
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nodectl/__main__.py", line 42, in
<module>
CliApplication()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nodectl/__init__.py", line 200, in
CliApplication
return cmdmap.command(args)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nodectl/__init__.py", line 118, in
command
return self.commands[command](**kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nodectl/__init__.py", line 102, in
motd
machine_readable=True).output, self.machine).write()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nodectl/status.py", line 51, in
__init__
self._update_info(status)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nodectl/status.py", line 78, in
_update_info
if "ok" not in status.lower():
AttributeError: Status instance has no attribute 'lower'
Admin Console: https://192.168.122.61:9090/
The admin console seems to work fine.
Are these issues serious or can they be ignored.
BR/David
7 years, 3 months
Software RAID on oVirt Node
by Vinícius Ferrão
Hello,
On typical deployment scenarios of oVirt which is the recommended RAID technologies for oVirt Node installation? Should I use controller based RAID or mdadm can be used instead? Is this recommended?
I’m asking this because other vendors requires hardware RAID, even those 100% based on CentOS, like XenServer. There’s not even a way to install it with mdadm (Software Raid).
Thanks,
V.
7 years, 3 months
Re: [ovirt-users] Users Digest, Vol 71, Issue 32
by Moacir Ferreira
--_000_VI1P190MB0285B6350EDE6A9547A049BDC8B50VI1P190MB0285EURP_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Fernando,
Since I have 3 servers then each one will have a connection to the other tw=
o. In this case I could setup 3 subnets, one for each link, avoiding in thi=
s way to implement bridging (and Spanning Tree) on the servers. My idea is =
that when I build the server I should use the IP addresses of the 40Gb NICs=
to setup Gluster and everything should to be ok. Anyway, I will test it on=
a virtual environment before installing.
Thanks,
Moacir
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 10:08:32 -0300
From: FERNANDO FREDIANI <fernando.frediani(a)upx.com>
To: users(a)ovirt.org
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Good practices
Message-ID: <8dd168a0-d5ab-bdf4-5c5d-197909afc515(a)upx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"windows-1252"; Format=3D"flowed"
Moacir, I beleive for using the 3 servers directly connected to each
others without switch you have to have a Bridge on each server for every
2 physical interfaces to allow the traffic passthrough in layer2 (Is it
possible to create this from the oVirt Engine Web Interface?). If your
ovirtmgmt network is separate from other (should really be) that should
be fine to do.
Fernando
On 07/08/2017 07:13, Moacir Ferreira wrote:
>
> Hi, in-line responses.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Moacir
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Yaniv Kaul <ykaul(a)redhat.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, August 7, 2017 7:42 AM
> *To:* Moacir Ferreira
> *Cc:* users(a)ovirt.org
> *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Good practices
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Moacir Ferreira
> <moacirferreira(a)hotmail.com <mailto:moacirferreira@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I am willing to assemble a oVirt "pod", made of 3 servers, each
> with 2 CPU sockets of 12 cores, 256GB RAM, 7 HDD 10K, 1 SSD. The
> idea is to use GlusterFS to provide HA for the VMs. The 3 servers
> have a dual 40Gb NIC and a dual 10Gb NIC. So my intention is to
> create a loop like a server triangle using the 40Gb NICs for
> virtualization files (VMs .qcow2) access and to move VMs around
> the pod (east /west traffic) while using the 10Gb interfaces for
> giving services to the outside world (north/south traffic).
>
>
> Very nice gear. How are you planning the network exactly? Without a
> switch, back-to-back? (sounds OK to me, just wanted to ensure this is
> what the 'dual' is used for). However, I'm unsure if you have the
> correct balance between the interface speeds (40g) and the disks (too
> many HDDs?).
>
> Moacir:The idea is to have a very high performance network for the
> distributed file system and to prevent bottlenecks when we move one VM
> from a node to another. Using 40Gb NICs I can just connect the servers
> back-to-back. In this case I don't need the expensive 40Gb switch, I
> get very high speed and no contention between north/south traffic with
> east/west.
>
>
> This said, my first question is: How should I deploy GlusterFS in
> such oVirt scenario? My questions are:
>
>
> 1 - Should I create 3 RAID (i.e.: RAID 5), one on each oVirt node,
> and then create a GlusterFS using them?
>
> I would assume RAID 1 for the operating system (you don't want a
> single point of failure there?) and the rest JBODs. The SSD will be
> used for caching, I reckon? (I personally would add more SSDs instead
> of HDDs, but it does depend on the disk sizes and your space requirements=
.
>
> Moacir: Yes, I agree that I need a RAID-1 for the OS. Now, generic
> JBOD or a JBOD assembled using RAID-5 "disks" createdby the server's
> disk controller?
>
> 2 - Instead, should I create a JBOD array made of all server's disks?
>
> 3 - What is the best Gluster configuration to provide for HA while
> not consuming too much disk space?
>
>
> Replica 2 + Arbiter sounds good to me.
> Moacir:I agree, and that is what I am using.
>
> 4 - Does a oVirt hypervisor pod like I am planning to build, and
> the virtualization environment, benefits from tiering when using a
> SSD disk? And yes, will Gluster do it by default or I have to
> configure it to do so?
>
>
> Yes, I believe using lvmcache is the best way to go.
>
> Moacir: Are you sure? I say that because the qcow2 files will be
> quite big. So if tiering is "file based" the SSD would have to be
> very, very big unless Gluster tiering do it by "chunks of data".
>
>
> At the bottom line, what is the good practice for using GlusterFS
> in small pods for enterprises?
>
>
> Don't forget jumbo frames. libgfapi (coming hopefully in 4.1.5).
> Sharding (enabled out of the box if you use a hyper-converged setup
> via gdeploy).
> *Moacir:* Yes! This is another reason to have separate networks for
> north/south and east/west. In that way I can use the standard MTU on
> the 10Gb NICs and jumbo frames on the file/move 40Gb NICs.
>
> Y.
>
>
> You opinion/feedback will be really appreciated!
>
> Moacir
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
7 years, 3 months
oVirt LDAP user authentication troubleshooting
by NUNIN Roberto
--_000_de4cb7680af64919af7be187e7761b68DENU01MS0077phoenixloc_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've two oVirt 4.1.4.2-1 pods used for labs.
These two pods are configured in the same way (three node with gluster)
Trying to setup LDAP auth, towards the same OpenLDAP server, setup ends cor=
rectly in both engine VM.
When I try to perform system permission modification, only one of these is =
recognizing the LDAP groups and allow setup and next users belonging to def=
ined groups to log-in and perform assigned level tasks.
On the second engine, system permissions, even if it recognize the LDAP dom=
ain (it appear in the selection box for search base) do not find nothing, g=
roups or individuals.
How to analyze this ? I wasn't able to find logs useful for troubleshooting=
.
Setup ended correctly with both Login and Search tasks complete successful.
Thanks
Roberto
________________________________
Questo messaggio e' indirizzato esclusivamente al destinatario indicato e p=
otrebbe contenere informazioni confidenziali, riservate o proprietarie. Qua=
lora la presente venisse ricevuta per errore, si prega di segnalarlo immedi=
atamente al mittente, cancellando l'originale e ogni sua copia e distruggen=
do eventuali copie cartacee. Ogni altro uso e' strettamente proibito e potr=
ebbe essere fonte di violazione di legge.
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege=
d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i=
n error, please notify the sender immediately, deleting the original and al=
l copies and destroying any hard copies. Any other use is strictly prohibit=
ed and may be unlawful.
--_000_de4cb7680af64919af7be187e7761b68DENU01MS0077phoenixloc_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr=
osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:=
//www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"=
>
<meta name=3D"Generator" content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.StileMessaggioDiPostaElettronica17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 2.0cm 2.0cm 2.0cm;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=3D"IT" link=3D"#0563C1" vlink=3D"#954F72">
<div class=3D"WordSection1">
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-=
family:"Arial",sans-serif">I’ve two oVirt 4.1.4.2-1 pods us=
ed for labs.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-=
family:"Arial",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-=
family:"Arial",sans-serif">These two pods are configured in the s=
ame way (three node with gluster)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-=
family:"Arial",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-=
family:"Arial",sans-serif">Trying to setup LDAP auth, towards the=
same OpenLDAP server, setup ends correctly in both engine VM.<o:p></o:p></=
span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-=
family:"Arial",sans-serif">When I try to perform system permissio=
n modification, only one of these is recognizing the LDAP groups and allow =
setup and next users belonging to defined groups
to log-in and perform assigned level tasks.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-=
family:"Arial",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-=
family:"Arial",sans-serif">On the second engine, system permissio=
ns, even if it recognize the LDAP domain (it appear in the selection box fo=
r search base) do not find nothing, groups or individuals.<o:p></o:p></span=
></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-=
family:"Arial",sans-serif">How to analyze this ? I wasn’t a=
ble to find logs useful for troubleshooting.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-=
family:"Arial",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-=
family:"Arial",sans-serif">Setup ended correctly with both Login =
and Search tasks complete successful.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-=
family:"Arial",sans-serif">Thanks<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-=
family:"Arial",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-=
family:"Arial",sans-serif">Roberto<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Ar=
ial",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Ar=
ial",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"line-height:12.05pt;text-autospace:none"><s=
pan style=3D"font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:=
IT"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<br>
<hr>
<font face=3D"Courier New" color=3D"Black" size=3D"2"><br>
Questo messaggio e' indirizzato esclusivamente al destinatario indicato e p=
otrebbe contenere informazioni confidenziali, riservate o proprietarie. Qua=
lora la presente venisse ricevuta per errore, si prega di segnalarlo immedi=
atamente al mittente, cancellando
l'originale e ogni sua copia e distruggendo eventuali copie cartacee. Ogni=
altro uso e' strettamente proibito e potrebbe essere fonte di violazione d=
i legge.<br>
<br>
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege=
d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i=
n error, please notify the sender immediately, deleting the original and al=
l copies and destroying any hard
copies. Any other use is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.<br>
</font>
</body>
</html>
--_000_de4cb7680af64919af7be187e7761b68DENU01MS0077phoenixloc_--
7 years, 3 months
[ANN] oVirt 4.1.5 Second Release Candidate is now available
by Sandro Bonazzola
The oVirt Project is pleased to announce the availability of the Second
Release Candidate of oVirt 4.1.5 for testing, as of August 4th, 2017
This is pre-release software. Please take a look at our community page[1]
to know how to ask questions and interact with developers and users.
All issues or bugs should be reported via oVirt Bugzilla[2].
This pre-release should not to be used in production.
This update is the second release candidate of the fifth in a series of
stabilization updates to the 4.1 series.
4.1.5 brings more than 20 enhancements and more than 50 bugfixes,
including more than 20 high or urgent
severity fixes, on top of oVirt 4.1 series
This release is available now for:
* Fedora 24 (tech preview)
* Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.3 or later
* CentOS Linux (or similar) 7.3 or later
This release supports Hypervisor Hosts running:
* Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.3 or later
* CentOS Linux (or similar) 7.3 or later
* oVirt Node 4.1
* Fedora 24 (tech preview)
See the release notes draft [3] for installation / upgrade instructions and
a list of new features and bugs fixed.
Notes:
- oVirt Appliance is already available
- oVirt Live is already available[4]
- oVirt Node is already available[4]
Additional Resources:
* Read more about the oVirt 4.1.5 release highlights:
http://www.ovirt.org/release/4.1.5/
* Get more oVirt Project updates on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ovirt
* Check out the latest project news on the oVirt blog:
http://www.ovirt.org/blog/
[1] https://www.ovirt.org/community/
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?classification=oVirt
[3] http://www.ovirt.org/release/4.1.5/
[4] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.1-pre/iso/
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
<https://red.ht/sig>
TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
7 years, 3 months
Cannot set a quota to limit resources for each user
by Soumya Koduri
Hi,
We have a use-case to limit VM resources for each user and were
following guidelines specified in the admin guide to set quota and limit
resources for each user [section: 16.8. Using Quota to Limit Resources
by User]. However looks like that quota is shared by all the users added
as consumers.
Suppose I have created a quota (say quota1) to limit the storage
capacity to 100GB for each user. Once I add user1 and user2 as consumers
to that quota, seems like both users combined are entitled to 100GB. Is
my understanding correct?
Please let me know if there is any way to configure a single quota which
could be applied for each user individually (i.e, in the above eg., each
user should be limited to 100GB storage capacity).
Or is the only way this can be done is by creating separate quota for
each user [which seems like tedious process and cannot scale]?
Thanks,
Soumya
7 years, 3 months