Thanks. It is on my centos host which is located deep in my NW.
Regards,
Niklas
On 15 jul 2014, at 16:41, "White Hat"
<whitehat237(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yes it can be disabled, but why not just add the rules you need to
make it work properly?
Are you asking about iptables on the host or the guest? Are you
actually using firewalld, or is it really iptables?
You can add a log statement before the reject rule in
/etc/sysconfig/iptables to log a message to /var/log/messages to show
what is being blocked.
Then you can open those ports that show up in your log as necessary.
For example:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21771684/iptables-log-and-drop-in-one-...
HTH
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Niklas Fondberg <niklas(a)vireone.com> wrote:
> Correction of my bad english...
> "can iptables be disabled if I never plan to use NAT:d guests?"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>