Re: [ovirt-users] Workflow after restoring engine from backup

It looks like I can't get a chance to shut down the HA VMs. I check the restore log and it did mention that it change the HA-VM entries. Just to make sure I looked at the DB and for the vms in question it looks like this. engine=# select vm_guid,status,vm_host,exit_status,exit_reason from vm_dynamic Where vm_guid IN (SELECT vm_guid FROM vm_static WHERE auto_startup='t' AND lease_sd_id is NULL); vm_guid | status | vm_host | exit_status | exit_reason --------------------------------------+--------+-----------------+-------------+------------- 8733d4a6-0844-xxxx-804f-6b919e93e076 | 0 | DXXXX | 2 | -1 4eeaa622-17f9-xxxx-b99a-cddb3ad942de | 0 | xxxxAPP | 2 | -1 fbbdc0a0-23a4-4d32-xxxx-a35c59eb790d | 0 | xxxxDB0 | 2 | -1 45a4e7ce-19a9-4db9-xxxxx-66bd1b9d83af | 0 | xxxxxWOR | 2 | -1 (4 rows) Should that be enough to have a safe start of the engine without any HA action kicking in. ?

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Yedidyah Bar David [mailto:didi@redhat.com] Gesendet: Montag, 19. März 2018 10:18 An: Sven Achtelik Cc: users(a)ovirt.org Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Workflow after restoring engine from backup On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Sven Achtelik <Sven.Achtelik(a)eps.aero&gt; wrote: > Hi Didi, > > my backups where taken with the end. Backup utility. I have 3 Data > centers, two of them with just one host and the third one with 3 > hosts running the engine. The backup three days old, was taken on > engine version 4.1 (4.1.7) and the restored engine is running on 4.1.9. Since the bug I mentioned was fixed in 4.1.3, you should be covered. > I have three HA VMs that would > be affected. All others are just normal vms. Sounds like it would be > the safest to shut down the HA vm S to make sure that nothing happens ? If you can have downtime, I agree it sounds safer to shutdown the VMs. > Or can I > disable the HA action in the DB for now ? No need to. If you restored with 4.1.9 engine-backup, it should have done this for you. If you still have the restore log, you can verify this by checking it. It should contain 'Resetting HA VM status', and then the result of the sql that it ran. Best regards, > > Thank you, > > Sven > > > > Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. > > > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- > Von: Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com&gt; > Datum: 19.03.18 07:33 (GMT+01:00) > An: Sven Achtelik <Sven.Achtelik(a)eps.aero&gt; > Cc: users(a)ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Workflow after restoring engine from > backup > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:45 PM, Sven Achtelik > <Sven.Achtelik(a)eps.aero&gt; > wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> I had issue with the storage that hosted my engine vm. The disk got >> corrupted and I needed to restore the engine from a backup. > > How did you backup, and how did you restore? > > Which version was used for each? > >> That worked as >> expected, I just didn’t start the engine yet. > > OK. > >> I know that after the backup >> was taken some machines where migrated around before the engine >> disks failed. > > Are these machines HA? > >> My question is what will happen once I start the engine service >> which has the restored backup on it ? Will it query the hosts for >> the running VMs > > It will, but HA machines are handled differently. > > See also: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441322 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446055 > >> or will it assume that the VMs are still on the hosts as they >> resided at the point of backup ? > > It does, initially, but then updates status according to what it gets > from hosts. > > But polling the hosts takes time, especially if you have many, and HA > policy might require faster handling. So if it polls first a host > that had a machine on it during backup, and sees that it's gone, and > didn't yet poll the new host, HA handling starts immediately, which > eventually might lead to starting the VM on another host. > > To prevent that, the fixes to above bugs make the restore process > mark HA VMs that do not have leases on the storage as "dead". > >> Would I need to change the DB manual to let the engine know where >> VMs are up at this point ? > > You might need to, if you have HA VMs and a too-old version of restore. > >> What will happen to HA VMs >> ? I feel that it might try to start them a second time. My biggest >> issue is that I can’t get a service Windows to shutdown all VMs and >> then lat them restart by the engine. >> >> >> >> Is there a known workflow for that ? > > I am not aware of a tested procedure for handling above if you have a > too-old version, but you can check the patches linked from above bugs > and manually run the SQL command(s) they include. They are > essentially comment 4 of the first bug. > > Good luck and best regards, > -- > Didi -- Didi