On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 22:14, Darrell Budic <budic(a)onholyground.com> wrote:
I agree, been checking some of my more disk intensive VMs this
morning,
switching them to noop definitely improved responsiveness. All the virtio
ones I’ve found were using deadline (with RHEL/Centos guests), but some of
the virt-scsi were using deadline and some were noop, so I’m not sure of a
definitive answer on that level yet.
For the hosts, it depends on what your backend is running. With a separate
storage server on my main cluster, it doesn’t matter what the hosts set for
me. You mentioned you run hyper converged, so I’d say it depends on what
your disks are. If you’re using SSDs, go none/noop as they don’t benefit
from the queuing. If they are HDDs, I’d test cfq or deadline and see which
gave better latency and throughput to your vms. I’d guess you’ll find
deadline to offer better performance, but cfq to share better amongst
multiple VMs. Unless you use ZFS underneath, then go noop and let ZFS take
care of it.
On Mar 18, 2019, at 2:05 PM, Strahil <hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi Darrel,
Still, based on my experience we shouldn't queue our I/O in the VM, just
to do the same in the Host.
I'm still considering if I should keep deadline in my hosts or to switch
to 'cfq'.
After all, I'm using Hyper-converged oVirt and this needs testing.
What I/O scheduler are you using on the host?
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
On Mar 18, 2019 19:15, Darrell Budic <budic(a)onholyground.com> wrote:
Checked this on mine, see the same thing. Switching the engine to noop
definitely feels more responsive.
I checked on some VMs as well, it looks like virtio drives (vda, vdb….)
get mq-deadline by default, but virtscsi gets noop. I used to think the
tuned profile for virtual-guest would set noop, but apparently not…
-Darrell
Our internal scale team is testing now 'throughput-performance' tuned
profile and it gives
promising results, I suggest you try it as well.
We will go over the results of a comparison against the virtual-guest
profile
, if there will be evidence for improvements we will set it as the default
(if it won't degrade small,medium scale envs).
On Mar 18, 2019, at 1:58 AM, Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I have changed my I/O scheduler to none and here are the results so far:
Before (mq-deadline):
Adding a disk to VM (initial creation) START: 2019-03-17 16:34:46.709
Adding a disk to VM (initial creation) COMPLETED: 2019-03-17 16:45:17.996
After (none):
Adding a disk to VM (initial creation) START: 2019-03-18 08:52:02.xxx
Adding a disk to VM (initial creation) COMPLETED: 2019-03-18 08:52:20.xxx
Of course the results are inconclusive, as I have tested only once - but I
feel the engine more responsive.
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
В неделя, 17 март 2019 г., 18:30:23 ч. Гринуич+2, Strahil <
hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com> написа:
Dear All,
I have just noticed that my Hosted Engine has a strange I/O scheduler:
Last login: Sun Mar 17 18:14:26 2019 from 192.168.1.43
[root@engine ~]# cat /sys/block/vda/queue/scheduler
[mq-deadline] kyber none
[root@engine ~]#
Based on my experience anything than noop/none is useless and
performance degrading for a VM.
Is there any reason that we have this scheduler ?
It is quite pointless to process (and delay) the I/O in the VM and then
process (and again delay) on Host Level .
If there is no reason to keep the deadline, I will open a bug about it.
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
Dear All,
I have just noticed that my Hosted Engine has a strange I/O scheduler:
Last login: Sun Mar 17 18:14:26 2019 from 192.168.1.43
[root@engine ~]# cat /sys/block/vda/queue/scheduler
[mq-deadline] kyber none
[root@engine ~]#
Based on my experience anything than noop/none is useless and
performance degrading for a VM.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement:
https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/MMTH6225GKY...