Hi,
I suspect most users didn't complain because
they do not have high IO workloads (yet).
I think most people run test setups (as do I).
However,
in my own (artificial) IO workload test
on engine 3.2.3. there was no extreme cpu penalty
for higher IO, the read/write(cache/no cache)
was an expected linear transformation, with no
high cpu at all.
I didn't test it with 3.3. though, and
as I said it was an artificial workload, no
real applications.
Am 13.01.2014 21:20, schrieb Blaster:
I didn’t push the IO very hard on it.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen