Re: [Users] ovirt-3.3.3 release postponed due to blockers

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 08:52:36AM +0000, Sven Kieske wrote: > Hi, > > any news regarding my questions? > > Am 29.01.2014 09:23, schrieb Sandro Bonazzola: >> Il 29/01/2014 09:21, Sven Kieske ha scritto: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I wanted to try it the other way around, installing vdsm-python-cpopen >>> and check if it runs without python-cpopen . >>> >>> But that leads me to a question: >>> >>> Is there any difference between these packages beside their different >>> name? >>> >>> If yes, what is the difference and which package should be installed? >>> I no, why is there a packet vdsm-python-cpopen ? >> >> CCing VDSM python-cpopen includes some improvements and bug fixes, that are going to be needed in ovirt-3.4. vdsm-python-cpopen is shipped by ovirt-3.3. python-cpopen wast intended to deprecate and replace vdsm-python-cpopen, but we have had way too many issues trying to do that properly in rpm/yum. Most of the bugs are ours, at least one is yum's. At the moment, the existence of python-cpopen in Fedora confuses `yum install vdsm`. To avoid this unfortunate delay, we can either include python-cpopen in ovirt-stable or exclude vdsm-python-cpopen from there. Both options are unfavorable, but so is continuing to wait.

Regards, Dan.