Also keep in mind that extensive logging in the vm's can seriously
impact your fs performance, so using a central syslogserver is a really
good idea.
/tony
On 2018-04-06 17:03, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
Den 6 apr. 2018 15:46 skrev Jayme <jaymef(a)gmail.com>:
Yaniv,
I appreciate your input, thanks!
I understand that everyone's use case is different, but I was hoping
to hear from some users that are using oVirt hyper-converged setup
and get some input on the performance. When I research GlusterFS I
hear a lot about how it can be slow especially when dealing with
small files. I'm starting to wonder if a straight up NFS server
with a few SSDs would be less hassle and perhaps offer better VM
performance than glusterFS can currently.
I want to get the best oVirt performance I can get (on somewhat of a
budget) with a fairly small amount of required disk space (under
2TB). I'm not sure if hyper-converged setup w/GlusterFS is the
answer or not. I'd like to avoid spending 15k only to find out that
it's too slow.
What is "too slow" for you, what are your expectations?
Much depending on that, you will find that different goals require
different tools. Like hammering on a screw and all that :)
/K
--
Tony Albers
Systems administrator, IT-development
Royal Danish Library, Victor Albecks Vej 1, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Tel: +45 2566 2383 / +45 8946 2316