Re: [ovirt-users] jboss deployments timeout (was: getting 404 after fresh install of oVirt 3.4 on CentOS 6.5 (+ solution))
I am the reporter of the below bz, and the author of the fix [1]. However, I
don't know jboss at all - just searched around, found somewhere the option
'deployment-timeout' (not sure where, probably a quick search can find this)
and verified that the fix works. It seems like neither any of the reviewers
of the change know enough about jboss to do some more analysis. Can anyone
else, that knows jboss, please look at this issue? Specifically:
1. Was anything related to the maximum time for deployments changed in relevant
jboss versions?
2. What is affected? What isn't?
- fedora 19/20(/21?), el6
- ovirt repos (3.3, 3.4, master) and minimum requirements
John: If this is reproducible for you, you might want to try the fix [1]
(linked to from the bug). If you do, please report - what exact versions
(OS, jboss, ovirt, etc) you used, and (according to the logs) how long did
the deployment take. Thanks!
[1] http://gerrit.ovirt.org/25895
Best Regards,
--
Didi
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Taylor" <jtt77777(a)gmail.com>
To: "R P Herrold" <herrold(a)owlriver.com>
Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 11:36:57 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] getting 404 after fresh install of oVirt 3.4 on CentOS 6.5 (+
solution)
I've seen a similar problem (404 on webadmin) on my 4GB physical ovirt
engine box, but it turned out to be the jboss timeout in deployment
Relevant bz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multiple&id=1078291
so it might have been that it wasn't a memory limit in the OP that
caused failure, but the time it took jboss to deploy
-John
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:31 PM, R P Herrold <herrold(a)owlriver.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2014, Sven Kieske wrote:
>
>> Doesn't this make you wonder where the minimum requirements come from?
>>
>> If it runs with less than 1 GB RAM, why do the docs say you need 4 GB
>> and recommend even 16 GB ?
>
> certainly a fair question ... There is also a statement in
> that setup script as to needed filesystem space which seems to
> have been simply 'pulled out of the air', rather than
> documented / explained
>
>> Is it just a matter of scale(number of vms/hosts/DCs) ?
>> What would make engine consume more RAM?
>>
>> Can you maybe lower the minimum requirements?
>
> Or isolate the recommendations to a flat file which is
> commented, and sourced by the script, so a person can discern
> the difference between 'hard' requirements, and simple
> 'recommendations' for a stated use case
>
> -- Russ herrold
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users