1:18 p.m.
Hi everyone,
I've been asked to deploy a VDI solution based on our oVirt infrastructure.
What we have in production is a 3.6 manager (standalone, not HE) with
a 3.5 cluster (CentOS 6) and a 3.6 cluster (CentOS 7), iSCSI storage,
fully redundant networking.
What is not clear to me is the client side, especially because we have
been asked to implement a thin client solution but I've been almost
unable to find suitable devices.
Is there anyone in this list willing to share his/her experience on
this topic? Probably my search skill is low but I've only seen
references to IGEL. Other brands?
There is another strong requirement: our network infrastructure makes
use of 802.1x to authenticate client devices and it would be highly
advisable to respect that constraint.
TIA,
Giorgio.
1:21 p.m.
Do you have a requirement for 3d acceleration on the VDI guests?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Giorgio Bersano <giorgio.bersano(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been asked to deploy a VDI solution based on our oVirt infrastructure.
What we have in production is a 3.6 manager (standalone, not HE) with
a 3.5 cluster (CentOS 6) and a 3.6 cluster (CentOS 7), iSCSI storage,
fully redundant networking.
What is not clear to me is the client side, especially because we have
been asked to implement a thin client solution but I've been almost
unable to find suitable devices.
Is there anyone in this list willing to share his/her experience on
this topic? Probably my search skill is low but I've only seen
references to IGEL. Other brands?
There is another strong requirement: our network infrastructure makes
use of 802.1x to authenticate client devices and it would be highly
advisable to respect that constraint.
TIA,
Giorgio.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
1:22 p.m.
You can also use ansible to provision your 802.1x network gear along with
the client machines, this way everything is provisioned the same way every
time.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Donny Davis <donny(a)fortnebula.com> wrote:
Do you have a requirement for 3d acceleration on the VDI guests?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Giorgio Bersano <
giorgio.bersano(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I've been asked to deploy a VDI solution based on our oVirt
> infrastructure.
> What we have in production is a 3.6 manager (standalone, not HE) with
> a 3.5 cluster (CentOS 6) and a 3.6 cluster (CentOS 7), iSCSI storage,
> fully redundant networking.
>
> What is not clear to me is the client side, especially because we have
> been asked to implement a thin client solution but I've been almost
> unable to find suitable devices.
>
> Is there anyone in this list willing to share his/her experience on
> this topic? Probably my search skill is low but I've only seen
> references to IGEL. Other brands?
> There is another strong requirement: our network infrastructure makes
> use of 802.1x to authenticate client devices and it would be highly
> advisable to respect that constraint.
>
> TIA,
> Giorgio.
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
6:29 p.m.
2016-06-15 12:21 GMT+02:00 Donny Davis <donny(a)fortnebula.com>:
Do you have a requirement for 3d acceleration on the VDI guests?
On the first deployment no, it is basically for frontend and backend
office activity.
But we would probably also asked to try it for multimedia activities
like casual guests watching internet videos at the local public
library.
So two different kind of devices, I suppose.
Anything to suggest?
Thank you,
Giorgio.
8:20 p.m.
Il 15/Giu/2016 17:29, "Giorgio Bersano" <giorgio.bersano(a)gmail.com> ha
scritto:
2016-06-15 12:21 GMT+02:00 Donny Davis <donny(a)fortnebula.com>:
> Do you have a requirement for 3d acceleration on the VDI guests?
On the first deployment no, it is basically for frontend and backend
office activity.
But we would probably also asked to try it for multimedia activities
like casual guests watching internet videos at the local public
library.
So two different kind of devices, I suppose.
Anything to suggest?
Thank you,
Giorgio.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Why not a nuc, or similar device from other vendors that are emerging?
I don't know for the lan security part, but you can find a nuc5cpyh with
celeron or nuc5ppyh with pentium respectively at 140 and 170 euros. Both
have 6w tdp.
You have to add at least memory but with further 20 euros you get 4gb.
Disk optional, you can use sdxc or boot from lan....
Just a suggestion for further investigation.
I'm currently using a top line nuc6 as an hypervisor without any problem
with 3-4 vms, so I think a bottom line nuc can serve optimally as a thin
client without its costs.
Some of them have also Kensington anti theft that can be a good idea due to
their size.
Hih,
Gianluca
4:50 p.m.
2016-06-15 19:20 GMT+02:00 Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com>:
Why not a nuc, or similar device from other vendors that are emerging?
I don't know for the lan security part, but you can find a nuc5cpyh with
celeron or nuc5ppyh with pentium respectively at 140 and 170 euros. Both
have 6w tdp.
You have to add at least memory but with further 20 euros you get 4gb.
Disk optional, you can use sdxc or boot from lan....
Just a suggestion for further investigation.
I'm currently using a top line nuc6 as an hypervisor without any problem
with 3-4 vms, so I think a bottom line nuc can serve optimally as a thin
client without its costs.
Some of them have also Kensington anti theft that can be a good idea due to
their size.
Hih,
Gianluca
Hi Gianluca,
we were looking for a prepackaged solution because of the lack of
human resources to devote to the project.
But if pursuing this research becomes too exhausting we would probably
develop a linux solution and in that case the kind of terminal you
suggested is interesting indeed.
Thanks,
Giorgio.
11:33 a.m.
we were looking for a prepackaged solution because of the lack of
human resources to devote to the project.
But if pursuing this research becomes too exhausting we would probably
develop a linux solution and in that case the kind of terminal you
suggested is interesting indeed.
Hi, I'm currently trying to find a solution based on linux too.
If you're interested in details about my research and tests, I can make you a summary
:
On most linux thin client distributions, spicec and spicy are intergrated. Sadly, they are
not real spice clients.
As you can find on the spice documentation "spicec is an obsolete legacy client, and
spicy is only a test application".
The only real Spice client yet is remote-viewer (part of virt-viewer package), by default
it works with VNC, but if you want it also to support spice, you need spice-client-gtk
(the name of this package can maybe vary betweem distributions).
Before developing a solution, you should maybe check Thinstation, which is a prepackaged
solution that make you able to create your own ISO files for client. I made once some 65
MB client images. Yet it support very well RDP, ICA and VNC.
The only bad point with his solution is the fact remote-viewer and spice-client gtk
aren't integrated yet. But it should be integrated soon (I'll work on that when
I'll have time) but you can still compile it. However, it takes time to understand how
to deal with Thinstation, but the result is really impressive.
There are also some other solutions like Netpoldo, but it's using old debian/ubuntu
versions and doesn't seem to be still really alive... (and old remote-viewer versions
don't really work properly, or when it does there is no sound, cf debian jessie)
I hope this helps. I'll try to post here when I will have a working setup from client
side. I guess this is still in the topic as Giorgio was asking for sharing experience :)
5:54 p.m.
On Pá, 2016-06-17 at 10:33 +0200, Alexis HAUSER wrote:
>we were looking for a prepackaged solution because of the lack
of
>human resources to devote to the project.
>But if pursuing this research becomes too exhausting we would probably
>develop a linux solution and in that case the kind of terminal you
>suggested is interesting indeed.
Hi, I'm currently trying to find a solution based on linux too.
If you're interested in details about my research and tests, I can make you a summary
:
On most linux thin client distributions, spicec and spicy are intergrated. Sadly, they
are not real spice clients.
As you can find on the spice documentation "spicec is an obsolete legacy client, and
spicy is only a test application".
The only real Spice client yet is remote-viewer (part of virt-viewer package), by default
it works with VNC, but if you want it also to support spice, you need spice-client-gtk
(the name of this package can maybe vary betweem distributions).
Before developing a solution, you should maybe check Thinstation, which is a prepackaged
solution that make you able to create your own ISO files for client. I made once some 65
MB client images. Yet it support very well RDP, ICA and VNC.
The only bad point with his solution is the fact remote-viewer and spice-client gtk
aren't integrated yet.
According to [1], they are.
David
[1] https://github.com/Thinstation/thinstation/issues/106#issuecomment-228758466
But it should be integrated soon (I'll work on that when I'll
have time) but you can still compile it. However, it takes time to understand how to deal
with Thinstation, but the result is really impressive.
There are also some other solutions like Netpoldo, but it's using old debian/ubuntu
versions and doesn't seem to be still really alive... (and old remote-viewer versions
don't really work properly, or when it does there is no sound, cf debian jessie)
I hope this helps. I'll try to post here when I will have a working setup from client
side. I guess this is still in the topic as Giorgio was asking for sharing experience :)
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
6:50 p.m.
On that same note... I would love to deploy several Thin clients around
my house using a single Centos Server for my kids to use.
Is this still not possible?
Do I still have to assign each of my kids a vm?
Regards,
--
Fernando Fuentes
ffuentes(a)txweather.org
http://www.txweather.org
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/Giu/2016 17:29, "Giorgio Bersano" <giorgio.bersano(a)gmail.com> ha
scritto:
>
> 2016-06-15 12:21 GMT+02:00 Donny Davis <donny(a)fortnebula.com>:
> > Do you have a requirement for 3d acceleration on the VDI guests?
>
> On the first deployment no, it is basically for frontend and
> backend
> office activity.
> But we would probably also asked to try it for multimedia
> activities
> like casual guests watching internet videos at the local public
> library.
> So two different kind of devices, I suppose.
>
> Anything to suggest?
>
> Thank you,
> Giorgio.
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Why not a nuc, or similar device from other vendors that are emerging?
I don't know for the lan security part, but you can find a nuc5cpyh
with celeron or nuc5ppyh with pentium respectively at 140 and 170
euros. Both have 6w tdp.
You have to add at least memory but with further 20 euros you
get 4gb.
Disk optional, you can use sdxc or boot from lan....
Just a suggestion for further investigation.
I'm currently using a top line nuc6 as an hypervisor without any
problem with 3-4 vms, so I think a bottom line nuc can serve
optimally as a thin client without its costs.
Some of them have also Kensington anti theft that can be a good idea
due to their size.
Hih,
Gianluca
_________________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
3:54 a.m.
Fernando, you can use LTSP for your solution. Check them out.
www.ltsp.org
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Fernando Fuentes wrote:
On that same note... I would love to deploy several Thin clients
around my house using a single Centos Server for my kids to use.
Is this still not possible?
Do I still have to assign each of my kids a vm?
Regards,
--
Fernando Fuentes
ffuentes(a)txweather.org
http://www.txweather.org
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>
>
> Il 15/Giu/2016 17:29, "Giorgio Bersano" <giorgio.bersano(a)gmail.com>
> ha scritto:
> >
> > 2016-06-15 12:21 GMT+02:00 Donny Davis <donny(a)fortnebula.com>:
> > > Do you have a requirement for 3d acceleration on the VDI guests?
> >
> > On the first deployment no, it is basically for frontend and
> > backend
> > office activity.
> > But we would probably also asked to try it for multimedia
> > activities
> > like casual guests watching internet videos at the local public
> > library.
> > So two different kind of devices, I suppose.
> >
> > Anything to suggest?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Giorgio.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users(a)ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> Why not a nuc, or similar device from other vendors that are
> emerging?
> I don't know for the lan security part, but you can find a nuc5cpyh
> with celeron or nuc5ppyh with pentium respectively at 140 and 170
> euros. Both have 6w tdp.
> You have to add at least memory but with further 20 euros you
> get 4gb.
> Disk optional, you can use sdxc or boot from lan....
> Just a suggestion for further investigation.
> I'm currently using a top line nuc6 as an hypervisor without any
> problem with 3-4 vms, so I think a bottom line nuc can serve
> optimally as a thin client without its costs.
> Some of them have also Kensington anti theft that can be a good idea
> due to their size.
> Hih,
> Gianluca
>
> _________________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_________________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
4:57 a.m.
Melissa,
Very kind of you to revive this as I am still looking for a better
solution. I am well aware of LTSP. Just not my cup of tea if you know
what I mean ;)
Regards,
--
Fernando Fuentes
ffuentes(a)txweather.org
http://www.txweather.org
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016, at 07:54 PM, Melissa Mesler wrote:
Fernando, you can use LTSP for your solution. Check them out.
www.ltsp.org
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Fernando Fuentes wrote:
> On that same note... I would love to deploy several Thin clients
> around my house using a single Centos Server for my kids to use.
> Is this still not possible?
> Do I still have to assign each of my kids a vm?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Fernando Fuentes
> ffuentes(a)txweather.org
> http://www.txweather.org
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>>
>>
>> Il 15/Giu/2016 17:29, "Giorgio Bersano"
<giorgio.bersano(a)gmail.com>
>> ha scritto:
>> >
>> > 2016-06-15 12:21 GMT+02:00 Donny Davis <donny(a)fortnebula.com>:
>> > > Do you have a requirement for 3d acceleration on the VDI guests?
>> >
>> > On the first deployment no, it is basically for frontend and
>> > backend
>> > office activity.
>> > But we would probably also asked to try it for multimedia
>> > activities
>> > like casual guests watching internet videos at the local public
>> > library.
>> > So two different kind of devices, I suppose.
>> >
>> > Anything to suggest?
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Giorgio.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Users mailing list
>> > Users(a)ovirt.org
>> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>> Why not a nuc, or similar device from other vendors that are
>> emerging?
>> I don't know for the lan security part, but you can find a nuc5cpyh
>> with celeron or nuc5ppyh with pentium respectively at 140 and 170
>> euros. Both have 6w tdp.
>> You have to add at least memory but with further 20 euros you
>> get 4gb.
>> Disk optional, you can use sdxc or boot from lan....
>> Just a suggestion for further investigation.
>> I'm currently using a top line nuc6 as an hypervisor without any
>> problem with 3-4 vms, so I think a bottom line nuc can serve
>> optimally as a thin client without its costs.
>> Some of them have also Kensington anti theft that can be a good idea
>> due to their size.
>> Hih,
>> Gianluca
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _________________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_________________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
3:41 p.m.
On that same note... I would love to deploy several Thin clients
around my house using a single Centos Server for my kids to use.
Is this still not possible?
Do I still have to assign each of my kids a vm?
Regards,
--
Fernando Fuentes
ffuentes(a)txweather.org
http://www.txweather.org
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
This depend on what you implement on server side and how you configure it.
If you thought about a centos server with ovirt, then you can do as you want : assign each
kid a VM, or makes VM they can both access.
6:07 p.m.
Hi everybody,
thank you for taking the time to share your experiences.
It seems we have now some stuff to digest and to do our tests. I think
I'll report back when things will settle down.
Best regards,
Giorgio.
1:26 p.m.
On 15 Jun 2016, at 12:18, Giorgio Bersano
<giorgio.bersano(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been asked to deploy a VDI solution based on our oVirt infrastructure.
What we have in production is a 3.6 manager (standalone, not HE) with
a 3.5 cluster (CentOS 6) and a 3.6 cluster (CentOS 7), iSCSI storage,
fully redundant networking.
What is not clear to me is the client side, especially because we have
been asked to implement a thin client solution but I've been almost
unable to find suitable devices.
if that client can still be a PC, albeit diskless, it’s still easier and probably cheaper
than any other special hw.
Is there anyone in this list willing to share his/her experience on
this topic? Probably my search skill is low but I've only seen
references to IGEL. Other brands?
not that i know of, and even that one had (or still have?) some issues with SPICE
performance as it’s not kept up to date
There is another strong requirement: our network infrastructure
makes
use of 802.1x to authenticate client devices and it would be highly
advisable to respect that constraint.
for the VDI connections? I don’t think SPICE supports that, but please bring it up on
spice list to make sure.
if it would be for oVirt user portal then, I guess with pluggable aaa we can support
anything. Ondro?
TIA,
Giorgio.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
1:56 p.m.
On 06/15/2016 12:26 PM, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
> On 15 Jun 2016, at 12:18, Giorgio Bersano <giorgio.bersano(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> I've been asked to deploy a VDI solution based on our oVirt infrastructure.
> What we have in production is a 3.6 manager (standalone, not HE) with
> a 3.5 cluster (CentOS 6) and a 3.6 cluster (CentOS 7), iSCSI storage,
> fully redundant networking.
>
> What is not clear to me is the client side, especially because we have
> been asked to implement a thin client solution but I've been almost
> unable to find suitable devices.
if that client can still be a PC, albeit diskless, it’s still easier and probably cheaper
than any other special hw.
>
> Is there anyone in this list willing to share his/her experience on
> this topic? Probably my search skill is low but I've only seen
> references to IGEL. Other brands?
not that i know of, and even that one had (or still have?) some issues with SPICE
performance as it’s not kept up to date
> There is another strong requirement: our network infrastructure makes
> use of 802.1x to authenticate client devices and it would be highly
> advisable to respect that constraint.
for the VDI connections? I don’t think SPICE supports that, but please bring it up on
spice list to make sure.
if it would be for oVirt user portal then, I guess with pluggable aaa we can support
anything. Ondro?
It depends on use case, if apache module which uses radius is ok, then
yes it should work.
The problem is that we currently support only ldap as authorization backend.
>
> TIA,
> Giorgio.
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
6:15 p.m.
2016-06-15 12:56 GMT+02:00 Ondra Machacek <omachace(a)redhat.com>:
On 06/15/2016 12:26 PM, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
>
>
>> On 15 Jun 2016, at 12:18, Giorgio Bersano <giorgio.bersano(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>> I've been asked to deploy a VDI solution based on our oVirt
>> infrastructure.
>> What we have in production is a 3.6 manager (standalone, not HE) with
>> a 3.5 cluster (CentOS 6) and a 3.6 cluster (CentOS 7), iSCSI storage,
>> fully redundant networking.
>>
>> What is not clear to me is the client side, especially because we have
>> been asked to implement a thin client solution but I've been almost
>> unable to find suitable devices.
>
>
> if that client can still be a PC, albeit diskless, it’s still easier and
> probably cheaper than any other special hw.
>
>>
>> Is there anyone in this list willing to share his/her experience on
>> this topic? Probably my search skill is low but I've only seen
>> references to IGEL. Other brands?
>
>
> not that i know of, and even that one had (or still have?) some issues
> with SPICE performance as it’s not kept up to date
>
>> There is another strong requirement: our network infrastructure makes
>> use of 802.1x to authenticate client devices and it would be highly
>> advisable to respect that constraint.
>
>
> for the VDI connections? I don’t think SPICE supports that, but please
> bring it up on spice list to make sure.
> if it would be for oVirt user portal then, I guess with pluggable aaa we
> can support anything. Ondro?
>
It depends on use case, if apache module which uses radius is ok, then yes
it should work.
The problem is that we currently support only ldap as authorization backend.
Hi, here I'm speaking of wired network authentication (and nothing more).
What we have in place now: network ports are confined in a VLAN only
useful to authenticate the PC (windows). When the PC boots it
interacts with the radius server (freeradius) using PEAP-MsChapv2. If
the PC is registered in the Active Directory and authenticates against
it (at machine level, not user level) the switch port is given a VLAN
based on attributes stored in the AD and it is enabled to communicate
without restrictions.
With Thin Client we would like to have something similar but it would
be fine even to directly instruct freeradius to enable the port and
set the VLAN on the basis of the thin client MAC address.
I've just discovered that Wyse ThinOS thin clients (Dell) support
802.1x, I wonder if is compatible with oVirt...
Time to search on the spice lists, as Michal suggested.
Thanks,
Giorgio.
6:21 p.m.
2016-06-15 12:26 GMT+02:00 Michal Skrivanek <michal.skrivanek(a)redhat.com>:
> On 15 Jun 2016, at 12:18, Giorgio Bersano <giorgio.bersano(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> I've been asked to deploy a VDI solution based on our oVirt infrastructure.
> What we have in production is a 3.6 manager (standalone, not HE) with
> a 3.5 cluster (CentOS 6) and a 3.6 cluster (CentOS 7), iSCSI storage,
> fully redundant networking.
>
> What is not clear to me is the client side, especially because we have
> been asked to implement a thin client solution but I've been almost
> unable to find suitable devices.
if that client can still be a PC, albeit diskless, it’s still easier and probably cheaper
than any other special hw.
That's a worrying statement, we were explicitly asked for thin clients
(low power, low noise, small form factor).
>
> Is there anyone in this list willing to share his/her experience on
> this topic? Probably my search skill is low but I've only seen
> references to IGEL. Other brands?
not that i know of, and even that one had (or still have?) some issues with SPICE
performance as it’s not kept up to date
That's even more worrisome.
Thanks,
Giorgio.
6:17 p.m.
On 15 Jun 2016, at 17:21, Giorgio Bersano
<giorgio.bersano(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2016-06-15 12:26 GMT+02:00 Michal Skrivanek <michal.skrivanek(a)redhat.com>:
>
>> On 15 Jun 2016, at 12:18, Giorgio Bersano <giorgio.bersano(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>> I've been asked to deploy a VDI solution based on our oVirt infrastructure.
>> What we have in production is a 3.6 manager (standalone, not HE) with
>> a 3.5 cluster (CentOS 6) and a 3.6 cluster (CentOS 7), iSCSI storage,
>> fully redundant networking.
>>
>> What is not clear to me is the client side, especially because we have
>> been asked to implement a thin client solution but I've been almost
>> unable to find suitable devices.
>
> if that client can still be a PC, albeit diskless, it’s still easier and probably
cheaper than any other special hw.
That's a worrying statement, we were explicitly asked for thin clients
(low power, low noise, small form factor).
well, if it’s a requirement then it is perhaps worth it to look for them a bit more.
Though I would personally try to look for something looking as a thin client but being a
“normal” desktop, and load it with a cut-down Linux (or Windows, whatever you fancy) and
use remote-viewer. Better performance, better control, likely cheaper. I’m sure there are
people stuffing a raspberry pi into a plastic box, charging $500, calling it a thin
client:)
>>
>> Is there anyone in this list willing to share his/her experience on
>> this topic? Probably my search skill is low but I've only seen
>> references to IGEL. Other brands?
There are others, but indeed IGEL is probably the most prominent
In general the support matrix for oVirt would be the same as for corresponding RHEV
version, so check with vendors.
>
> not that i know of, and even that one had (or still have?) some issues with SPICE
performance as it’s not kept up to date
That's even more worrisome.
depends what you need, if it’s nothing fancy it may be sufficient enough and provide good
experience
Thanks,
michal
Thanks,
Giorgio.
3070
days inactive
3083
days old
17 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
Alexis HAUSER -
David Jaša -
Donny Davis -
Fernando Fuentes -
Gianluca Cecchi -
Giorgio Bersano -
Melissa Mesler -
Michal Skrivanek -
Ondra Machacek