Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
by Charlie
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Itamar Heim <iheim(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find
> good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in
> coming versions?
>
> Thanks,
> Itamar
Good/useful: Open Source virtualization with a strong web management
interface. Rapidly improving, too.
wish improved: SPICE connection reliability and LDAPS support.
wish added: native ATA-over-Ethernet SAN support.
wish removed: Kerberos dependencies. Let people who want Kerb have
it, but don't force it where it's not needed. LDAP over SSL is
secure.
Many thanks to all the oVirt team for all their hard work!
--Charlie
12 years
[Users] adding iso images
by Carl T. Miller
Is there a way to add an iso image to an nfs share by simply
copying a file? Or is there a command to run from one of the
hosts? The only method I know is using engine-iso-uploader
and it's not working in my environment.
c
12 years
[Users] unable to install ovirt nightly all in one due to java dependency
by Gianluca Cecchi
Helo,
on a freshly installed F18 I get this
$ sudo yum install ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-allinone
...
--> Processing Dependency: java-1.7.0-openjdk >= 1:1.7.0.9-2.3.3.2 for
package: ovirt-engine-3.2.0-1.20130104.git2ad721c.fc18.noarch
---> Package plexus-cli.noarch 0:1.2-12.fc18 will be installed
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: ovirt-engine-3.2.0-1.20130104.git2ad721c.fc18.noarch
(ovirt-nightly)
Requires: java-1.7.0-openjdk >= 1:1.7.0.9-2.3.3.2
Installed: 1:java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.9-2.3.3.fc18.1.x86_64
(@fedora)
java-1.7.0-openjdk = 1:1.7.0.9-2.3.3.fc18.1
My java 1.7.0.9-2.3.3.fc18.1 is requested by libreoffice...
I don't see any java in ovirt repo..
Is it really true such a dependency at a low level?
1.7.0.9-2.3.3.2
vs
1.7.0.9-2.3.3.fc18.1
what an universally runnable language... ;-)
If I try to remove java
Dependencies Resolved
=======================================================================================================================================
Package Arch
Version Repository Size
=======================================================================================================================================
Removing:
java-1.7.0-openjdk x86_64
1:1.7.0.9-2.3.3.fc18.1 @fedora 89 M
Removing for dependencies:
icedtea-web x86_64
1.3.1-1.fc18 @fedora 873 k
libreoffice-calc x86_64
1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 23 M
libreoffice-core x86_64
1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 219 M
libreoffice-draw x86_64
1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 2.2 M
libreoffice-graphicfilter x86_64
1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 1.1 M
libreoffice-impress x86_64
1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 3.1 M
libreoffice-langpack-en x86_64
1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 0.0
libreoffice-langpack-it x86_64
1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 27 M
libreoffice-math x86_64
1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 3.2 M
libreoffice-pdfimport x86_64
1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 1.5 M
libreoffice-presenter-screen x86_64
1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 2.2 M
libreoffice-ure x86_64
1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 8.6 M
libreoffice-writer x86_64
1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 15 M
libreoffice-xsltfilter x86_64
1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 1.9 M
Transaction Summary
=======================================================================================================================================
Remove 1 Package (+14 Dependent packages)
12 years
Re: [Users] "ataX: resetting link" problem with ovirt 3.1 on Fedora Core 17
by Yuval M
uname -a output:
Linux segfault.home 3.6.5-1.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 31 19:37:18 UTC 2012
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
and the other host:
Linux kernelpanic.home 3.6.8-2.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 27 19:35:02 UTC
2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
if there is any other diagnostic information required I will happily supply
it, just tell me what...
Yuval
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Marcelo Barbosa <
mr.marcelo.barbosa(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Yuval,
>
> What is kernel version ? The oVirt stable version(3.1) run better from:
>
> [admin@firehome ~]$ uname -a
> Linux firehome.no-ip.org *3.3.4-5*.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon May 7 17:29:34
> UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> Marcelo Barbosa
> *mr.marcelo.barbosa(a)gmail.com*
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Yuval M <yuvalme(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> We're M.Sc students at Tel-Aviv University trying to setup a basic ovirt
>> system with 2 hosts.
>> Both run Fedora Core 17.
>>
>> We've run unto a problem that makes the hosts seem down from the web
>> management UI and stops the VMs that run on them.
>> this occurs on both hosts at the very same second, which leads me to
>> believe it's not a hardware problem:
>> ("segfault" is the name of the server. don't ask.)
>>
>> Has anyone seen something like this?
>> any suggestions?
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Yuval Meir
>> Limor Gavish
>>
>>
>>
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.851539] NFS: Cache request
>> denied due to non-unique superblock keys
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.930361] ata1: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.237778] ata1: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.239721] ata1: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.241759] ata2: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.548726] ata2: SATA link up 6.0
>> Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559061] ata2.00: configured for
>> UDMA/133
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559066] ata2: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559279] ata3: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.866689] ata3: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.868680] ata3: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.868928] ata4: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.176588] ata4: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.178470] ata4: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.178707] ata5: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.485535] ata5: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.487472] ata5: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.487656] ata6: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.795437] ata6: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.797325] ata6: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.797583] ata7: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.105616] ata7: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.107307] ata7: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.109318] ata8: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416217] ata8: SATA link up 1.5
>> Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416650] ata8.00: configured for
>> UDMA/66
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416769] ata8: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416922] ata9: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722240] ata9: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722256] ata9: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722545] ata10: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027130] ata10: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027234] ata10: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027483] ata11.00: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.331952] ata11.01: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.787975] ata11.00: SATA link up
>> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.787989] ata11.01: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829480] ata11.00: configured for
>> UDMA/133
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829487] ata11: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829638] ata12.00: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.133734] ata12.01: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.589741] ata12.00: SATA link up
>> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.589757] ata12.01: SATA link up
>> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.600049] ata12.00: configured for
>> UDMA/133
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.604444] ata12.01: configured for
>> UDMA/133
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.604450] ata12: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.604745] ata13: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403601.921125] ata13: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403601.921144] ata13: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403601.921300] ata14: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.377523] ata14: SATA link up 1.5
>> Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.386842] ata14.00: configured for
>> UDMA/100
>> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.392491] ata14: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.392695] ata15: soft resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.543523] ata15: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.543727] ata16: soft resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:16 segfault kernel: [403602.706229] ata16: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:16 segfault vdsm Storage.LVM WARNING lvm vgs failed: 5 [] ['
>> Volume group "78b1f41d-29cf-4e1a-a84d-fb9175f4388e" not found']
>> Dec 29 14:00:16 segfault kernel: [403603.273230] ata1: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:16 segfault kernel: [403603.580216] ata1: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:16 segfault kernel: [403603.582803] ata1: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:16 segfault kernel: [403603.585201] ata2: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403603.892210] ata2: SATA link up 6.0
>> Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403603.901635] ata2.00: configured for
>> UDMA/133
>> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403603.901641] ata2: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403603.901873] ata3: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403604.209120] ata3: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403604.210966] ata3: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403604.211156] ata4: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403604.517966] ata4: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403604.519902] ata4: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403604.520157] ata5: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403604.826862] ata5: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403604.828830] ata5: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403604.829067] ata6: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403605.135731] ata6: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403605.137698] ata6: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403605.137887] ata7: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403605.445714] ata7: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403605.447619] ata7: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403605.449682] ata8: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403605.756684] ata8: SATA link up 1.5
>> Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403605.757166] ata8.00: configured for
>> UDMA/66
>> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403605.757266] ata8: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403605.757485] ata9: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403606.064643] ata9: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403606.064660] ata9: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403606.064839] ata10: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403606.369548] ata10: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403606.369562] ata10: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403606.369842] ata11.00: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:20 segfault kernel: [403606.675420] ata11.01: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:20 segfault kernel: [403607.131342] ata11.00: SATA link up
>> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:20 segfault kernel: [403607.131355] ata11.01: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:20 segfault kernel: [403607.248752] ata11.00: configured for
>> UDMA/133
>> Dec 29 14:00:20 segfault kernel: [403607.248759] ata11: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:20 segfault kernel: [403607.249045] ata12.00: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:20 segfault kernel: [403607.554194] ata12.01: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.011215] ata12.00: SATA link up
>> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.011244] ata12.01: SATA link up
>> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.021439] ata12.00: configured for
>> UDMA/133
>> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.028239] ata12.01: configured for
>> UDMA/133
>> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.028243] ata12: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.028442] ata13: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.345178] ata13: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.345195] ata13: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.345443] ata14: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault kernel: [403608.800805] ata14: SATA link up 1.5
>> Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault kernel: [403608.810109] ata14.00: configured for
>> UDMA/100
>> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault kernel: [403608.815632] ata14: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault kernel: [403608.815863] ata15: soft resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault kernel: [403608.966859] ata15: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault kernel: [403608.967054] ata16: soft resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault kernel: [403609.130010] ata16: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault vdsm Storage.LVM WARNING lvm vgs failed: 5 [] ['
>> Volume group "f0175c0c-75f1-4518-ba77-f7476171f6c6" not found']
>> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault vdsm Storage.StorageDomain WARNING Resource
>> namespace f0175c0c-75f1-4518-ba77-f7476171f6c6_imageNS already registered
>> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault vdsm Storage.StorageDomain WARNING Resource
>> namespace f0175c0c-75f1-4518-ba77-f7476171f6c6_volumeNS already registered
>> Dec 29 14:00:23 segfault vdsm Storage.LVM WARNING lvm vgs failed: 5 [] ['
>> Volume group "78b1f41d-29cf-4e1a-a84d-fb9175f4388e" not found']
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
12 years
Re: [Users] Wiki: Network summary page
by Dan Kenigsberg
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 05:12:12PM +0100, Adrian Gibanel wrote:
> As I mentioned on another message I've been given wiki edition permissions. I was supposed to write a way of having hostonly networks thanks to libvirt and thanks to a former mailing list message but... Here's what happened. I wanted to know if there was something in the wiki about it and... So...
>
> Here's my wiki page:
> http://www.ovirt.org/User:Adrian15
>
> And here there's a kind of Network summary of what you can find on the oVirt wiki itself about network and mainly my thoughts about them:
> http://www.ovirt.org/User:Adrian15/Network_Index
>
> As you can see there are some ideas:
>
> * The mockups are not clearly defined as such in their own pages and there should be a common header for that
> * Some mockups are too hidden from main page.
> * There's no a central way of knowing the supported oVirt network topologies (now with my index it's a bit easier)
> * Network stuff is messed up with some bits in one place and some bits in another place.
>
> Not sure when I'll be able to write to continue this Network index writing and the host-only one because I've already a lot of time with this little summary but if you think that I can search for another term in wiki search instead of "Network" that unveils other networks page don't hesitate to tell me it.
>
> So... Enjoy and improve! (As this is a wiki).
Thanks, Adrian. Revamping the networking topic on the wiki is a great
initiative - it should not be tucked away in a personal sub page. It
would be great if you could tag network-related pages with a
"Networking" category, and move your summary to that category's page.
P.s I am a bit confused on what you mean about hostonly network - is
this related to http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Nicless_Network ?
12 years
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
by Andrew Cathrow
----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Jaša" <djasa(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Bret Palsson" <bret(a)getjive.com>
> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 10:20:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
>
> Bret Palsson píše v Pá 04. 01. 2013 v 08:05 -0700:
> > I'd like to see a built in VNC console that is java or a Spice java
> > console, something that runs cross platform, OS X, Windows, Linux
> > etc...
>
> There are purely browser-based solutions for both: noVNC (mature
> AFAIK)
> and spice-html5 (still in beta quality, developers welcome). The
> problem
Beta quality is probably a little optimistic for spice-htm4
> with both is that they require websockets on server side which is not
> yet ready in qemu - spice-server implementation had to be reverted
> and
You can run a novnc server on another host to proxy it - similar to what Horizon does.
> will need a rewrite and libvncserver gained initial support just few
> months ago.
>
> I'm sure that web-based consoles will be available in oVirt shortly
> after all layers below get the necessary features.
>
> David
>
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:04 AM, David Jaša <djasa(a)redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > Marcelo Barbosa píše v Pá 04. 01. 2013 v 11:46 -0200:
> > > Dear Itamar,
> > >
> > >
> > > My dreams for oVirt 3.2:
> > >
> > >
> > > 1) Packages CentOs 6.x (ovirt-engine,
> > > ovirt-guest-agent);
> > > 2) Resize VM disk from GUI ovirt-engine;
> > > 3) Spice for Google Chrome, this browser run in
> > > anywere
> > O.S. and largest world use;
> >
> >
> > spice-xpi 2.8 will support chrome/chromium but it will
> > still
> > be linux-only.
> >
> > David
> >
> > > 4) Show in Virtual Machines > General > ip/ip's from
> > > vm
> > OR Virtual Machines > Network Interfaces > show ip;
> > > 5) ISO upload from GUI ovirt-engine the best option;
> > > 6) Monitoring enviroment oVirt to Zabbix and
> > > Nagios(total
> > vms, mem clusters, and more...) example:
> > https://github.com/dougsland/nagios-plugins-rhev
> > >
> > >
> > > I think this would oVirt the project to another level,
> > much higher ...
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Marcelo Barbosa
> > > mr.marcelo.barbosa(a)gmail.com
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Soeren Grunewald
> > <soeren.grunewald(a)avionic-design.de> wrote:
> > > On 01/03/2013 07:04 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > > On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald
> > wrote:
> > > On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar
> > > Heim
> > wrote:
> > > On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM,
> > Soeren Grunewald wrote:
> > > On 01/03/2013
> > > 05:08
> > PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > > Hi
> > > Everyone,
> > >
> > > as we
> > > wrap
> > oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they
> > > find
> > good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see
> > >
> > improved/added in coming versions?
> > >
> > > A nice feature
> > > would
> > be to be able to migrate guests between AMD and
> > > Intel host
> > > machines.
> > > KVM should be
> > > able
> > to support it [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors
> > > are able/can to
> > support this. Because oVirt aims to support different
> > > hypervisors it
> > > might
> > be problematic. But I think offline migration
> > > should be
> > > possible.
> > >
> > > can you please elaborate
> > what do you mean by offline migration?
> > >
> > >
> > > With offline migration, I means
> > > the
> > guest is not running while moving
> > > it from one host to another.
> > >
> > > I have 2 host machines for
> > > testing.
> > One is running on a AMD Opteron and
> > > the other Intel Xeon. Since I can
> > not put both machines in the same
> > > cluster, I have specified a
> > > cluster
> > called AMD (for the opteron) and
> > > another called Intel (for the
> > > xeon).
> > > Now I would like to move a guest
> > from the AMD machine to the Intel
> > > machine. Since the CPU does not
> > match I can't.
> > >
> > > I'm not aware that you can't.
> > >
> > >
> > > Ok, now is see my problem.
> > >
> > >
> > > you should be able to move the VM from
> > > one
> > cluster to the other.
> > > yes, it will see a different cpu model.
> > > why
> > is that an issue?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To move the guest I need to "edit" the guest and
> > than I can change the cluster.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Soeren
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I assume the solution for this
> > > could
> > be a generic cluster definition.
> > > Something with a limited/specific
> > cpu set equal to the qemu
> > > configuration "-cpu qemu32" or
> > > "-cpu
> > qemu64".
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Soeren
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Users mailing list
> > > Users(a)ovirt.org
> > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Users mailing list
> > > Users(a)ovirt.org
> > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > David Jaša, RHCE
> >
> > SPICE QE based in Brno
> > GPG Key: 22C33E24
> > Fingerprint: 513A 060B D1B4 2A72 7F0D 0278 B125 CD00 22C3
> > 3E24
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users(a)ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users(a)ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> --
>
> David Jaša, RHCE
>
> SPICE QE based in Brno
> GPG Key: 22C33E24
> Fingerprint: 513A 060B D1B4 2A72 7F0D 0278 B125 CD00 22C3 3E24
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
12 years
Re: [Users] Destktop VM to Server VM ?
by Michael Pasternak
On 01/03/2013 09:59 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 05:32 PM, Hideo Goto wrote:
>> First of all, a Happy new year to every subscriber of the list.
>>
>> My first concern of the year about ovirt:
>>
>> Is it possible to change the type of an existing VM from desktop to
>> server by any possible means?
>> In my case, the VM was imported from KVM to Ovirt 3.0 environment
>> using virt-v2v. I have just found out that the VM was recognized as
>> desktop while expected as server .
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any advise.
>
> I'm pretty sure the REST API/SDK/CLI would allow this as updating this field of the VM.
> michael?
it's used to work afair, but now i see this:
[oVirt shell (connected)]# show vm iscsi_desktop | grep type
type : desktop
[oVirt shell (connected)]#
[oVirt shell (connected)]# update vm iscsi_desktop --type server
error:
status: 400
reason: Bad Request
detail: Failed updating the properties of the VM. This may be caused either by:
1. The values selected are not appropriate for the VM; or
2. Its values cannot be updated while the VM is in UP state (Please shut down the VM in order to modify properties such as CPU or cluster).
Omer?
--
Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
12 years
[Users] Storage Domain
by sirin
Hi all,
Why offline Storage Domain with download iso image on storage?
Download iso image and parallel installation OS fail (
may be this is bug? it's not correct…
Artem
12 years
Re: [Users] Destktop VM to Server VM ?
by Hideo Goto
Thanks a lot Itamar.
Everything became clear.
Unfortunately, We are still using ovirt 3.0, for which I think ovirt-shell
is not available.
So, I will make a small java program.
Best RGDS
2013/1/5 Itamar Heim <iheim(a)redhat.com>
> On 01/04/2013 07:04 PM, Hideo Goto wrote:
>
>> Thaks a lot for your suggestion.
>>
>> in fact I found the <type>parameter which specifies server/desktop,
>> checking the output of VMs' parameters by REST (/api/vms).
>> Is it this very "type" paramter to change?
>>
>
> yes.
>
>
>
>> Best RGDS
>> Hideo GOTO
>>
>> P.S.
>> I would be happy if you could recomend me any tool, if existing,
>> which might make it easy to update parameters by REST.
>>
>
> ovirt-shell is a cli tool which should let you update such a parameter
> with a one liner command.
> you can also use the python or java sdk's for any heavier scripting.
>
>
>
>> 2013/1/4 Itamar Heim <iheim(a)redhat.com>:
>>
>>> On 01/03/2013 05:32 PM, Hideo Goto wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> First of all, a Happy new year to every subscriber of the list.
>>>>
>>>> My first concern of the year about ovirt:
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to change the type of an existing VM from desktop to
>>>> server by any possible means?
>>>> In my case, the VM was imported from KVM to Ovirt 3.0 environment
>>>> using virt-v2v. I have just found out that the VM was recognized as
>>>> desktop while expected as server .
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance for any advise.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm pretty sure the REST API/SDK/CLI would allow this as updating this
>>> field
>>> of the VM.
>>> michael?
>>>
>>
>
>
12 years
