January 2014 - Users - oVirt List Archives

[Users] Possible problems testing 3.3.3 RC
by Gianluca Cecchi 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

Hello, engine 3.3.3 beta1 on fedora 19 fully updated (for f19 repos). I would like to upgrade and test 3.3.3 RC I just updated ovirt-release so that now I have ovirt-release-fedora-10.0.1-2.noarch yum clean metadata modified new ovirt repofile enabling updates-testing and disabling beta [ovirt-stable] name=Older Stable builds of the oVirt project baseurl=http://ovirt.org/releases/stable/rpm/Fedora/$releasever/ [ovirt-3.3.2] name=oVirt 3.3.2 release baseurl=http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.3.2/rpm/Fedora/$releasever/ [ovirt-updates-testing] name=Test Updates builds of the oVirt project baseurl=http://ovirt.org/releases/updates-testing/rpm/Fedora/$releasever/ Even if ovirt update will be made through engine-setup, I presum that a "yum update" shouldn't give any depedency error, correct? Instead I have: # yum update Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit, versionlock Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package ovirt-engine-dwh.noarch 0:3.3.3-1.fc19 will be updated ---> Package ovirt-engine-dwh.noarch 0:3.4.0-0.2.master.20140122122024.fc19 will be an update --> Processing Dependency: ovirt-engine-dwh-setup >= 3.4.0-0.2.master.20140122122024.fc19 for package: ovirt-engine-dwh-3.4.0-0.2.master.20140122122024.fc19.noarch ---> Package ovirt-engine-lib.noarch 0:3.3.3-0.1.beta1.fc19 will be updated ---> Package ovirt-engine-lib.noarch 0:3.3.3-1.fc19 will be an update ---> Package ovirt-engine-setup.noarch 0:3.3.3-0.1.beta1.fc19 will be updated ---> Package ovirt-engine-setup.noarch 0:3.3.3-1.fc19 will be an update ---> Package ovirt-engine-websocket-proxy.noarch 0:3.3.3-0.1.beta1.fc19 will be updated ---> Package ovirt-engine-websocket-proxy.noarch 0:3.3.3-1.fc19 will be an update ---> Package ovirt-image-uploader.noarch 0:3.3.2-1.fc19 will be updated ---> Package ovirt-image-uploader.noarch 0:3.3.3-1.fc19 will be an update ---> Package ovirt-iso-uploader.noarch 0:3.3.2-1.fc19 will be updated ---> Package ovirt-iso-uploader.noarch 0:3.3.3-1.fc19 will be an update ---> Package ovirt-log-collector.noarch 0:3.3.2-2.fc19 will be updated ---> Package ovirt-log-collector.noarch 0:3.3.3-1.fc19 will be an update --> Running transaction check ---> Package ovirt-engine-dwh-setup.noarch 0:3.4.0-0.2.master.20140122122024.fc19 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-ovirt-engine-common for package: ovirt-engine-dwh-setup-3.4.0-0.2.master.20140122122024.fc19.noarch --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: ovirt-engine-dwh-setup-3.4.0-0.2.master.20140122122024.fc19.noarch (ovirt-updates-testing) Requires: ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-ovirt-engine-common You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest Why ovirt-engine-dwh.noarch 0:3.4.0-0.2.master.20140122122024.fc19 is proposed as an update? Gianluca

3 5

[Users] Ovirt 3.3.2. and vdsm 4.14
by Federico Alberto Sayd 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

Hello: Why Ovirt 3.3.2. installs vdsm 4.14 on Centos 6.5?? I am installing 5 nodes with Centos 6.5. I have installed two nodes, I have added: 1 - epel repo (http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/i386/epel-release-6-8.noarch.r…) 2 - ovirt repo (http://ovirt.org/releases/ovirt-release-el.noarch.rpm) In the two first nodes Ovirt engine installed vdsm 4.13. Now I have installed the third node with the same repos and Ovirt installs vdsm 4.14 and when it tries to activate the node complains about the vdsm version, it says that vdsm version is not compatible: Host "my-third-node" is installed with VDSM version (4.14) and cannot join cluster Cluster-XXX which is compatible with VDSM versions [4.13, 4.9, 4.11, 4.12, 4.10]. /etc/yum.repos.d in the trhee nodes are the same: CentOS-Base.repo CentOS-Debuginfo.repo CentOS-Media.repo CentOS-Vault.repo el6-ovirt.repo epel.repo epel-testing.repo glusterfs-epel.repo Why the difference? It is not suppossed that oVirt 3.3.2 should install vdsm 3.13 ?? Thanks, Federico

2 1

[Users] What component to use when reporting bugs on engine-managed-domains?
by Allon Mureinik 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

Hi list, I'm taking a look at engine-managed-domains as part of the oVirt 3.4 Test Day, and was wondering what component I should use to report bugs on it. The closest available component seems to be ovirt-engine-installer, as this is a "setup" flow in some sense, but it doesn't really feel right. Any better ideas? Or, alternatively, is there any way to add an ovirt-engine-managed-domains component to bugzilla? Thanks, Allon

2 2

[Users] ovirt-guest-agent beta1 packages for the ovirt 3.4 testday
by Vinzenz Feenstra 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

Hi, For the today's ovirt 3.4 testday I have prepared repositories for Fedora 19, Fedora 20 and el6/CentOS6: http://evilissimo.fedorapeople.org/repos/ovirt-guest-agent/ovirt-3.4/beta1/ Please let me know if you find any issues. -- Regards, Vinzenz Feenstra | Senior Software Engineer RedHat Engineering Virtualization R & D Phone: +420 532 294 625 IRC: vfeenstr or evilissimo Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

1 0

[Users] no new mom for ovirt?
by Sven Kieske 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

Hi, I just checked this BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025845 This is closed for RedHat but afaik not for upstream. It mentions the fixed mom version: mom-0.3.2-8.el6ev but on resources.ovirt.org I find just older versions like http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.4.0-alpha/rpm/EL/6/noarch/mom-0.3.2-3… so downstream (payed) red hat has newer versions than upstream how can that be? Or am I looking in the wrong repo? Should this not be hosted on ovirt.org repo? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen

4 5

[Users] Upgrade 3.3 - 3.4
by Maurice James 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

------=_NextPart_000_00B7_01CF17AB.7109AE20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Anyone else seeing this error on upgrade from 3.3 - 3.4? [ ERROR ] Yum [u'Errors were encountered while downloading packages.', u'ovirt-engine-backend-3.4.0-0.5.beta1.el6.noarch: failure: noarch/ovirt-engine-backend-3.4.0-0.5.beta1.el6.noarch.rpm from ovirt-3.4.0-prerelease: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.'] ------=_NextPart_000_00B7_01CF17AB.7109AE20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" = xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" = xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" = xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META = HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dus-ascii"><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 = (filtered medium)"><style></style></head><body lang=3DEN-US = link=3D"#0563C1" vlink=3D"#954F72"><div class=3DWordSection1>Anyone else seeing this error on upgrade from 3.3 - = 3.4?<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p>[ ERROR ] Yum [u'Errors were encountered while = downloading packages.', = u'ovirt-engine-backend-3.4.0-0.5.beta1.el6.noarch: failure: = noarch/ovirt-engine-backend-3.4.0-0.5.beta1.el6.noarch.rpm from = ovirt-3.4.0-prerelease: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to = try.']<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p><o:p> </o:p></div></body></html> ------=_NextPart_000_00B7_01CF17AB.7109AE20--

2 1

[Users] oVirt 3.4.0 beta is now available
by Sandro Bonazzola 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

The oVirt team is pleased to announce that the 3.4.0 Release is now available in beta for testing. Release notes and information on the changes for this update are still being worked on and will be available soon on the wiki[1]. Please ensure to follow install instruction from release notes if you're going to test it. A new repository ovirt-3.4.0-prerelease has been added for delivering this beta and future refreshes until release candidate. A new oVirt Node build will be available soon as well. You're welcome to join us testing this beta release in tomorrow test day [2]! [1] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.4.0_release_notes [2] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.4_Test_Day -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

4 9

[Users] fencing: HP ilo100 status does NMI, reboots computer
by Ted Miller 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

--------------040009030705040405030507 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am having trouble getting fencing to work on my HP DL180 g6 servers. They have ilo100 controllers. The documentation mentions ipmi compliance, but there are problems. The ipmilan driver gets a response, but it is the wrong response. A status request results in the NMI line being asserted, which (in standard PC architecture) is the same as pressing the reset button (which these servers don't have). Here are some log excerpts: 16:33 just after re-running re-install from engine, which ended: *From oVirt GUI "Events" tab *Host s1 installed State was set to up for host s1. Host s3 from cluster Default was *chosen* as a proxy to execute Status command on Host s1 Host s1 power management was verified successfully 16:34 *on ssh screen:* Message from syslogd@s1 at Jan 21 16:34:14 ... kernel:Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 31 on CPU 0. Message from syslogd@s1 at Jan 21 16:34:14 ... kernel:Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled? Message from syslogd@s1 at Jan 21 16:34:14 ... kernel:Dazed and confused, but trying to continue ***from IPMI web interface event log:* Generic 01/21/2014 21:34:15 Gen ID 0x21 Bus Uncorrectable Error Assertion Generic 01/21/2014 21:34:15 IOH_NMI_DETECT State Asserted Assertion * From oVirt GUI "Events" tab *Host s1 is non responsive Host s3 from cluster Default was chosen as a proxy to execute Restart command on Host s1 Host s3 from cluster Default was chosen as a proxy to execute Stop command on Host s1 Host s3 from cluster Default was chosen as a proxy to execute Status command on Host s1 Host s1 was stopped by engine Manual fence for host s1 was started Host s3 from cluster Default was chosen as a proxy to execute Status command on Host s1 Host s3 from cluster Default was chosen as a proxy to execute Start command on Host s1 Host s3 from cluster Default was chosen as a proxy to execute Status command on Host s1 Host s1 was started by engine Host s1 is rebooting State was set to up for host s1. Host s3 from cluster Default was chosen as a proxy to execute Status command on Host s1 16:41 saw kernel panic output on remote KVM terminal computer rebooted itself I have searched for ilo100, but find nothing related to ovirt, so am clueless as to what is the "correct" driver for this hardware. So far I have seen this mostly on server1 (s1), but that is also the one I have cycled up and down most often. I have also seen where the commands are apparently issued too fast (these servers are fairly slow booting). For example, I found that one server was powered down when the boot process had gotten to the stage where the RAID controller screen was up, so it had not had time to complete the boot that was already in progress. Ted Miller Elkhart, IN, USA --------------040009030705040405030507 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> I am having trouble getting fencing to work on my HP DL180 g6 servers.  They have ilo100 controllers.  The documentation mentions ipmi compliance, but there are problems. The ipmilan driver gets a response, but it is the wrong response.  A status request results in the NMI line being asserted, which (in standard PC architecture) is the same as pressing the reset button (which these servers don't have). Here are some log excerpts: <table style="text-align: left; width: 100%;" border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2"> <tbody> <tr> <td style="vertical-align: top;">16:33 </td> <td style="vertical-align: top;">just after re-running re-install from engine, which ended: From oVirt GUI "Events" tab Host s1 installed State was set to up for host s1. Host s3 from cluster Default was chosen as a proxy to execute Status command on Host s1 Host s1 power management was verified successfully </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="vertical-align: top;">16:34 </td> <td style="vertical-align: top;">on ssh screen: Message from syslogd@s1 at Jan 21 16:34:14 ...  kernel:Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 31 on CPU 0. Message from syslogd@s1 at Jan 21 16:34:14 ...  kernel:Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled? Message from syslogd@s1 at Jan 21 16:34:14 ...  kernel:Dazed and confused, but trying to continue from IPMI web interface event log: <table id="Table1" class="datatable" cellpadding="5"> <tbody> <tr> <td>Generic</td> <td>01/21/2014</td> <td>21:34:15</td> <td>Gen ID 0x21</td> <td>Bus Uncorrectable Error</td> <td>Assertion</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Generic</td> <td>01/21/2014</td> <td>21:34:15</td> <td>IOH_NMI_DETECT</td> <td>State Asserted</td> <td>Assertion</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> From oVirt GUI "Events" tab Host s1 is non responsive Host s3 from cluster Default was chosen as a proxy to execute Restart command on Host s1 Host s3 from cluster Default was chosen as a proxy to execute Stop command on Host s1 Host s3 from cluster Default was chosen as a proxy to execute Status command on Host s1 Host s1 was stopped by engine Manual fence for host s1 was started Host s3 from cluster Default was chosen as a proxy to execute Status command on Host s1 Host s3 from cluster Default was chosen as a proxy to execute Start command on Host s1 Host s3 from cluster Default was chosen as a proxy to execute Status command on Host s1 Host s1 was started by engine Host s1 is rebooting State was set to up for host s1. Host s3 from cluster Default was chosen as a proxy to execute Status command on Host s1 </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="vertical-align: top;">16:41 </td> <td style="vertical-align: top;">saw kernel panic output on remote KVM terminal computer rebooted itself</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> I have searched for ilo100, but find nothing related to ovirt, so am clueless as to what is the "correct" driver for this hardware. So far I have seen this mostly on server1 (s1), but that is also the one I have cycled up and down most often. I have also seen where the commands are apparently issued too fast (these servers are fairly slow booting).  For example, I found that one server was powered down when the boot process had gotten to the stage where the RAID controller screen was up, so it had not had time to complete the boot that was already in progress. Ted Miller Elkhart, IN, USA </body> </html> --------------040009030705040405030507--

3 4

[Users] Reconfirming membership to do excessive bounces
by Pat Pierson 22 Jan '14

22 Jan '14

Sorry if this is a simple answer but I could not find anything on google about this. I keep having to reconfirm my membership with this list because I assume google is kicking back messages. Message is as follows: Your membership in the mailing list Users has been disabled due to excessive bounces The last bounce received from you was dated 21-Jan-2014. You will not get any more messages from this list until you re-enable your membership. You will receive 3 more reminders like this before your membership in the list is deleted. To re-enable your membership, you can simply respond to this message (leaving the Subject: line intact), or visit the confirmation page at Has anyone else had this issue with this list and gmail? if so how can i fix it? -- Patrick Pierson

2 1

[Users] membership disabled due to bouces again..
by Gianluca Cecchi 22 Jan '14

22 Jan '14

Already spotted this problem before... I just found that I lose e-mails from Tue Jan 21 11:45:10 EST 2014 to Wed Jan 22 15:35:51 EST 2014 And received only some minutes ago (22/Jan/2014 21:26 Italy Time) an e-mail regarding my disabled membership apparently occurred at Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:11 PM so that I didn't either know before .... Any way to solve this? I have to mix e-mail received and archives... Gianluca

1 0