July 2019 - Users - oVirt List Archives

Re: NVMe disk cause kernel panic in installer
by Strahil 20 Jul '19

20 Jul '19

Then, you can try a newer version of the kernel from epel repo. Also, check in the CentOS forum - maybe someone had a similar issue. Best Regards, Strahil NikolovOn Jul 20, 2019 03:27, bossman90(a)gmail.com wrote: > > Unfortunately, it didn't help. > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/2YSRWPT536PAE…

1 0

What values should i give in this ovirt api to get the correct response
by midhun raj 20 Jul '19

20 Jul '19

I am following this link. https://ovirt.org/documentation/admin-guide/chap-Backups_and_Migration.html… I got response for GET /api/vms/4ef8b995-ae58-49d6-8980-ef0fa6688d92/snapshots/1b94ca4e-8c03-4166-8d29-2b831e24b90e/disks HTTP/1.1 Accept: application/xml Content-type: application/xml Identify disk id "Array ( [disk] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [actual_size] => 0 [alias] => GlanceDisk-8700235 [format] => cow [image_id] => a42bda58-7556-4ebe-a54d-03dc0a3b1f54 [propagate_errors] => false [provisioned_size] => 8589934592 [read_only] => false [shareable] => false [sparse] => true [status] => ok [storage_type] => image [wipe_after_delete] => false [snapshot] => Array ( [id] => 1b94ca4e-8c03-4166-8d29-2b831e24b90e ) [storage_domains] => Array ( [storage_domain] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [id] => ad6aea6d-ff90-457f-98eb-99380949e23a ) ) ) [name] => GlanceDisk-8700235 [description] => CentOS 7 Generic Cloud Image v1711 for x86_64 (8700235) [id] => dded245b-4a73-48b4-a1b4-ba98c37490ad ) What is the values that i have to give to the POST request in this api POST /api/vms/22222222-2222-2222-2222-222222222222/disks/ HTTP/1.1 Accept: application/xml Content-type: application/xml <disk id="11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111"> <snapshot id="11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111"/> <active>true</active> </disk> to replace 1)vms ===>> 22222222-2222-2222-2222-222222222222 2)disk id 11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111 3)snapshot id 11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111

1 0

Re: Storage domain 'Inactive' but still functional
by Martijn Grendelman 19 Jul '19

19 Jul '19

Hi! Thanks. Like I wrote, I have metadata backups from /etc/lvm/backup and -/archive, and I also have the current metadata as it exists on disk. What I'm most concerned about, is the proposed procedure. I would create a backup of the VG, but I'm not sure what would be the most sensible way to do it. I could make a new iSCSI target and simply 'dd' the whole disk over, but that would take quite some time (it's 2,5 TB) and there are VMs that can't really be down for that long. And I'm not even sure that dd'ing the disk like that is a sensible strategy. Moving disks out of the domain is currently not possible. oVirt says 'Source Storage Domain is not active'. Thanks, Martijn. Op 18-7-2019 om 17:44 schreef Strahil Nikolov: Can you check the /etc/lvm/backup and /etc/lvm/archive on your SPM host (check the other hosts, just in case you find anything useful) ? Usually LVM makes backup of everything. I would recommend you to: 1. Create a backup of the problematic VG 2. Compare the backup file and a file from backup/archive folders for the same VG Check what is different with diff/vimdiff . It might give you a clue. I had some issues (non-related to oVirt) and restoring the VG from older backup did help me .Still ,any operation on block devices should be considered risky and a proper backup is needed. You could try to move a less important VM's disks out of this storage domain to another one. If it succeeds - then you can evacuate all VMs away before you can start "breaking" the storage domain. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov В четвъртък, 18 юли 2019 г., 16:59:46 ч. Гринуич+3, Martijn Grendelman <martijn.grendelman(a)isaac.nl><mailto:martijn.grendelman@isaac.nl> написа: Hi, It appears that O365 has trouble delivering mails to this list, so two earlier mails of mine are still somewhere in a queue and may yet be delivered. This mail has all of the content of 3 successive mails. I apologize for this format. Op 18-7-2019 om 11:20 schreef Martijn Grendelman: Op 18-7-2019 om 10:16 schreef Martijn Grendelman: Hi, For the first time in many months I have run into some trouble with oVirt (4.3.4.3) and I need some help. Yesterday, I noticed one of my iSCSI storage domains was almost full, and tried to move a disk image off of it, to another domain. This failed, and somewhere in the process, the whole storage domain went to status 'Inactive'. From engine.log: 2019-07-17 16:30:35,319+02 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsProxy] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1836383) [] starting processDomainRecovery for domain '875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429:HQST0_ISCSI02'. 2019-07-17 16:30:35,337+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsProxy] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1836383) [] Domain '875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429:HQST0_ISCSI02' was reported by all hosts in status UP as problematic. Moving the domain to NonOperational. 2019-07-17 16:30:35,410+02 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1836383) [5f6fd35e] EVENT_ID: SYSTEM_DEACTIVATED_STORAGE_DOMAIN(970), Storage Domain HQST0_ISCSI02 (Data Center ISAAC01) was deactivated by system because it's not visible by any of the hosts. The thing is, the domain is still functional on all my hosts. It carries over 50 disks, and all involved VMs are up and running, and don't seem to have any problems. Also, 'iscsiadm' on all hosts seems to indiciate that everything is fine with this specific target and reading from the device with dd, or getting its size with 'blockdev' all works without issue. When I try to reactivate the domain, these errors are logged: 2019-07-18 09:34:53,631+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43475) [79e386e] EVENT_ID: IRS_BROKER_COMMAND_FAILURE(10,803), VDSM command ActivateStorageDomainVDS failed: Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) 2019-07-18 09:34:53,631+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsBrokerCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43475) [79e386e] IrsBroker::Failed::ActivateStorageDomainVDS: IRSGenericException: IRSErrorException: Failed to ActivateStorageDomainVDS, error = Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',), code = 358 2019-07-18 09:34:53,648+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43475) [79e386e] EVENT_ID: USER_ACTIVATE_STORAGE_DOMAIN_FAILED(967), Failed to activate Storage Domain HQST0_ISCSI02 (Data Center ISAAC01) by martijn@-authz On the SPM host, there are errors that indicate problems with the LVM volume group: 2019-07-18 09:34:50,462+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [vdsm.api] START activateStorageDomain(sdUUID=u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429', spUUID=u'aefd5844-6e01-4070-b3b9-c0d73cc40c78', options=None) from=::ffff:172.17.1.140,56570, flow_id=197dadec, task_id=51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8 (api:48) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,464+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [storage.StoragePool] sdUUID=875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429 spUUID=aefd5844-6e01-4070-b3b9-c0d73cc40c78 (sp:1125) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 WARN (jsonrpc/2) [storage.LVM] Reloading VGs failed (vgs=[u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429'] rc=5 out=[] err=[' /dev/mapper/23536316636393463: Checksum error at offset 2748693688832', " Couldn't read volume group metadata from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463.", ' Metadata location on /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 at 2748693688832 has invalid summary for VG.', ' Failed to read metadata summary from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463', ' Failed to scan VG from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463', ' Volume group "875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429" not found', ' Cannot process volume group 875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429']) (lvm:442) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [vdsm.api] FINISH activateStorageDomain error=Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) from=::ffff:172.17.1.140,56570, flow_id=197dadec, task_id=51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8 (api:52) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 ERROR (jsonrpc/2) [storage.TaskManager.Task] (Task='51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8') Unexpected error (task:875) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 882, in _run return fn(*args, **kargs) File "<string>", line 2, in activateStorageDomain File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/common/api.py", line 50, in method ret = func(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 1262, in activateStorageDomain pool.activateSD(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/securable.py", line 79, in wrapper return method(self, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sp.py", line 1127, in activateSD dom = sdCache.produce(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 110, in produce domain.getRealDomain() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 51, in getRealDomain return self._cache._realProduce(self._sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 134, in _realProduce domain = self._findDomain(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 151, in _findDomain return findMethod(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/blockSD.py", line 1807, in findDomain return BlockStorageDomain(BlockStorageDomain.findDomainPath(sdUUID)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/blockSD.py", line 1665, in findDomainPath raise se.StorageDomainDoesNotExist(sdUUID) StorageDomainDoesNotExist: Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [storage.TaskManager.Task] (Task='51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8') aborting: Task is aborted: "Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',)" - code 358 (task:1181) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 ERROR (jsonrpc/2) [storage.Dispatcher] FINISH activateStorageDomain error=Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) (dispatcher:83) I need help getting this storage domain back online. Can anyone here help me? If you need any additional information, please let me know! It appears the VG metadata is corrupt: /dev/mapper/23536316636393463: Checksum error at offset 2748693688832 Couldn't read volume group metadata from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463. Metadata location on /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 at 2748693688832 has invalid summary for VG. Failed to read metadata summary from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 Failed to scan VG from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 Is this fixable? If so, how? So, I have found some information online, that suggests that PV metadata can be fixed by recreating the PV label using the correct PVID and a backup of the LVM metadata, like so: pvcreate -u <pv_uuid> --restorefile <lvm_metadata_backup> /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 Now I have the following two files: * An LVM metadata backup of yesterday 10:35, about 6 hours before the problem occurred. * The actual metadata found on the PV at offset 2748693688832 (obtained with hexedit on the block device). These are largely the same, but there are differences: * seqno = 1854 in the backup and 1865 in the actual metadata. * 3 logical volumes that are not present in the backup, but are in the actual metadata. I suspect that these are related to snapshots that were created for live storage migration, but I am not sure. In any case, I did NOT create any new disk images on this domain, so that can't be it. Now, support I wanted to try the 'pvcreate' route, then: * what would be the chances of success? Is this procedure at all advisable, or is there an alternative? * which restore file (1854 or 1865) should I use for the restore? * can I do this while the VG is in use? I tried running the command without --force, and it said 'Can't open /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 exclusively. Mounted filesystem?'. I didn't dare to try it with '--force'. I could really use some advice on how to proceed. This are about 36 VMs that have one or more disks on this domain. I could bring them down, although doing so for extended amounts of time would be problematic. I want to be careful, obviously, especially since the actual storage doesn't seem to be impacted at this time. The VMs are all still running without issue, and if I'm about to embark on a dangerous journey that could cause data loss, I need a contingency / recovery plan. Hoping someone can help... Best regards, Martijn Grendelman _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org<mailto:users@ovirt.org> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org<mailto:users-leave@ovirt.org> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/AKWOTMY6MKDEQ… -- Met vriendelijke groet, Kind regards, [Martijn]<mailto:martijn.grendelman@isaac.nl> Martijn Grendelman Infrastructure Architect T: +31 (0)40 264 94 44 [ISAAC]<https://www.isaac.nl> ISAAC Marconilaan 16 5621 AA Eindhoven The Netherlands T: +31 (0)40 290 89 79 www.isaac.nl<https://www.isaac.nl> [ISAAC #1 Again!]<https://www.isaac.nl/nl/over-ons/nieuws/isaac-news/ISAAC-voor-tweede-keer-n…> Dit e-mail bericht is alleen bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Indien dit bericht niet voor u is bedoeld wordt u verzocht de afzender hiervan op de hoogte te stellen door het bericht te retourneren en de inhoud niet te gebruiken. Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.

2 1

Doubt regarding ovirt api
by midhun raj 19 Jul '19

19 Jul '19

following the step 3 of api This is the response i got for GET /api/vms/4ef8b995-ae58-49d6-8980-ef0fa6688d92/snapshots/1b94ca4e-8c03-4166-8d29-2b831e24b90e/disks HTTP/1.1 Accept: application/xml Content-type: application/xml Identify disk id "Array ( [disk] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [actual_size] => 0 [alias] => GlanceDisk-8700235 [format] => cow [image_id] => a42bda58-7556-4ebe-a54d-03dc0a3b1f54 [propagate_errors] => false [provisioned_size] => 8589934592 [read_only] => false [shareable] => false [sparse] => true [status] => ok [storage_type] => image [wipe_after_delete] => false [snapshot] => Array ( [id] => 1b94ca4e-8c03-4166-8d29-2b831e24b90e ) [storage_domains] => Array ( [storage_domain] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [id] => ad6aea6d-ff90-457f-98eb-99380949e23a ) ) ) [name] => GlanceDisk-8700235 [description] => CentOS 7 Generic Cloud Image v1711 for x86_64 (8700235) [id] => dded245b-4a73-48b4-a1b4-ba98c37490ad ) ) ) " What is the values that i have to give to the POST request in this api POST /api/vms/22222222-2222-2222-2222-222222222222/disks/ HTTP/1.1 Accept: application/xml Content-type: application/xml <disk id="11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111"> <snapshot id="11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111"/> <active>true</active> </disk> to replace 1)vms ===>> 22222222-2222-2222-2222-222222222222 2)disk id 11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111 3)snapshot id 11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111

1 0

Storage domain 'Inactive' but still functional
by Martijn Grendelman 18 Jul '19

18 Jul '19

Hi, For the first time in many months I have run into some trouble with oVirt (4.3.4.3) and I need some help. Yesterday, I noticed one of my iSCSI storage domains was almost full, and tried to move a disk image off of it, to another domain. This failed, and somewhere in the process, the whole storage domain went to status 'Inactive'. From engine.log: 2019-07-17 16:30:35,319+02 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsProxy] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1836383) [] starting processDomainRecovery for domain '875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429:HQST0_ISCSI02'. 2019-07-17 16:30:35,337+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsProxy] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1836383) [] Domain '875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429:HQST0_ISCSI02' was reported by all hosts in status UP as problematic. Moving the domain to NonOperational. 2019-07-17 16:30:35,410+02 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1836383) [5f6fd35e] EVENT_ID: SYSTEM_DEACTIVATED_STORAGE_DOMAIN(970), Storage Domain HQST0_ISCSI02 (Data Center ISAAC01) was deactivated by system because it's not visible by any of the hosts. The thing is, the domain is still functional on all my hosts. It carries over 50 disks, and all involved VMs are up and running, and don't seem to have any problems. Also, 'iscsiadm' on all hosts seems to indiciate that everything is fine with this specific target and reading from the device with dd, or getting its size with 'blockdev' all works without issue. When I try to reactivate the domain, these errors are logged: 2019-07-18 09:34:53,631+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43475) [79e386e] EVENT_ID: IRS_BROKER_COMMAND_FAILURE(10,803), VDSM command ActivateStorageDomainVDS failed: Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) 2019-07-18 09:34:53,631+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsBrokerCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43475) [79e386e] IrsBroker::Failed::ActivateStorageDomainVDS: IRSGenericException: IRSErrorException: Failed to ActivateStorageDomainVDS, error = Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',), code = 358 2019-07-18 09:34:53,648+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43475) [79e386e] EVENT_ID: USER_ACTIVATE_STORAGE_DOMAIN_FAILED(967), Failed to activate Storage Domain HQST0_ISCSI02 (Data Center ISAAC01) by martijn@-authz On the SPM host, there are errors that indicate problems with the LVM volume group: 2019-07-18 09:34:50,462+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [vdsm.api] START activateStorageDomain(sdUUID=u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429', spUUID=u'aefd5844-6e01-4070-b3b9-c0d73cc40c78', options=None) from=::ffff:172.17.1.140,56570, flow_id=197dadec, task_id=51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8 (api:48) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,464+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [storage.StoragePool] sdUUID=875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429 spUUID=aefd5844-6e01-4070-b3b9-c0d73cc40c78 (sp:1125) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 WARN (jsonrpc/2) [storage.LVM] Reloading VGs failed (vgs=[u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429'] rc=5 out=[] err=[' /dev/mapper/23536316636393463: Checksum error at offset 2748693688832', " Couldn't read volume group metadata from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463.", ' Metadata location on /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 at 2748693688832 has invalid summary for VG.', ' Failed to read metadata summary from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463', ' Failed to scan VG from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463', ' Volume group "875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429" not found', ' Cannot process volume group 875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429']) (lvm:442) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [vdsm.api] FINISH activateStorageDomain error=Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) from=::ffff:172.17.1.140,56570, flow_id=197dadec, task_id=51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8 (api:52) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 ERROR (jsonrpc/2) [storage.TaskManager.Task] (Task='51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8') Unexpected error (task:875) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 882, in _run return fn(*args, **kargs) File "<string>", line 2, in activateStorageDomain File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/common/api.py", line 50, in method ret = func(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 1262, in activateStorageDomain pool.activateSD(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/securable.py", line 79, in wrapper return method(self, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sp.py", line 1127, in activateSD dom = sdCache.produce(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 110, in produce domain.getRealDomain() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 51, in getRealDomain return self._cache._realProduce(self._sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 134, in _realProduce domain = self._findDomain(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 151, in _findDomain return findMethod(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/blockSD.py", line 1807, in findDomain return BlockStorageDomain(BlockStorageDomain.findDomainPath(sdUUID)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/blockSD.py", line 1665, in findDomainPath raise se.StorageDomainDoesNotExist(sdUUID) StorageDomainDoesNotExist: Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [storage.TaskManager.Task] (Task='51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8') aborting: Task is aborted: "Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',)" - code 358 (task:1181) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 ERROR (jsonrpc/2) [storage.Dispatcher] FINISH activateStorageDomain error=Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) (dispatcher:83) I need help getting this storage domain back online. Can anyone here help me? If you need any additional information, please let me know! Best regards, Martijn Grendelman ISAAC

3 3

assign vm traffic to a physical NIC and Storage traffic to another NIC
by Erick Perez 18 Jul '19

18 Jul '19

Hi, fresh install I have created a network called "storage" and another called "vms" and both have vlan 102 tag. Only the "vms" network have the check on "vm network". then on Compute---Hosts---hvm001---setup_host_network physical nic enp3s0f0 has ovirtmgmt and vms networks defined physical nic enp3s0f1 has storage network defined Question is how do I tell ovirt that I want the STORAGE traffic to use enp3s0f1 ? I am using NFS data domains and I cannot find a place to tell the network/physical nic my NFS traffic should use. thanks,

2 1

LDAP Group issue with rfc2307bis
by Timmi 18 Jul '19

18 Jul '19

Hi oVirt List, I'm currently working on my new oVirt setup and want to integrate it into our LDAP server. Accounts are working fine but I have problems to get the groups working correctly. The LDAP server is base on ClearOS which is using the rfc2307bis setup. Means I don't have MemberOf inside my users. The user DN is as Member inside the group. I manage that oVirt is able to read the groups while overwriting: search.rfc2307-resolve-groups-memberUid.search-request.filter = &(objectClass=posixGroup)(memberUid=${seq:_rfc2307_uid_encoded}) with search.rfc2307-resolve-groups-memberUid.search-request.filter = &(objectClass=posixGroup)(member=${seq:_rfc2307_dn}) This is working absolutely fine for my admin group in "Administrator Portal". I can asign the group to the system permission "SuperUser" and everything is working great. My problem is with the "VM Portal" I have assigned "PowerUser" rights to a quota and it is possible to login but I receive the following error in the engine.log. 2019-07-18 07:38:12,317+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.GetPermissionsForObjectQuery] (default task-5) [a6828f8b-8ded-422f-a216-5e5406d7bf20] Query execution failed due to insufficient permissions. 2019-07-18 07:38:12,319+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.api.restapi.resource.AbstractBackendResource] (default task-5) [] Operation Failed: query execution failed due to insufficient permissions. I'm able to see the group permission in the user details. So I guess that something is already working. But I guess the error is preventing me to have the "create VM" button on the "VM Portal". Would be great if someone could help me out. I'm running the latest 4.3.4 version. Best regards Christoph

1 0

Support and suggestions for 10/25 GbE cards
by Gianluca Merlo 17 Jul '19

17 Jul '19

Hello everyone, I am in the hardware selection phase for an oVirt cluster which has a requirement for 10/25 GbE connectivity. Does anyone have any advice on which adapters are better supported and working on oVirt Node? The choice I have is between: - Intel XXV710 - Mellanox ConnectX-4 It is my first foray into this tier of connectivity, so pardon the naivety of the question. I would just like to hear suggesions from the experience any of you may have had in the field, so I can be better prepared and know which kind of problems I may run into, and if choosing a specific card over the other can spare me some. Thank you in advance for your help Gianluca

1 0

hosted engine, Hyperconverged recovery
by William Kwan 17 Jul '19

17 Jul '19

Hi, I need some direction to make sure we won't make more mistake in recovering a 3-node self hosted engine with Gluster. Someone carelessly, very, wiped out the first few MB of the LVM PV on one node. We changed the quorum and brought up the Gluster and oVirt. We ran vgcfgrestore on the 'bad node' and we can run pvscan, vgscan and lvscan to see the LV's. What should I do next to prevent more damage or corrupt the glusterfs on the other two nodes? Will this work? mkfs the LV's bring up gluster run gluster sync <goodNode>? ThanksWill

3 2

VM says paused, but does not appear to be.
by Jacob Green 17 Jul '19

17 Jul '19

I have a Fibre Channel back end for my oVirt cluster, and one of my VMS is saying "paused due to lack of storage space", however I can confirm that the back end storage has plenty of space and the VM itself does not appear to be paused. I can SSH the VM and perform tasks on the VM. So I am trying to figure out why it would say that, and how to clear it. Also have 20 something other VMS on this cluster and no errors like this on those. I am running engine 4.3.3.7-1.el7 Also I do not fully understand this chart, what I can tell you is that the top storage domain is my Fibre Channel storage, and it has plenty of available space, 35%-40% free And lastly this is what a df -h looks like on the given VM. If anyone has some insight on to what might cause this let me know and ill chase it down. Thank you

1 0