February 2022 - Users - oVirt List Archives

vm seal
by Nathanaël Blanchet 14 Feb '22

14 Feb '22

Hello, I noticed that a vm created from a "sealed" template is initially mount on one host with libguestfs, with a virt-sysprep process, before getting ready to be used. This should be unuseful given that the template is already sealed. Is there a reason to that? -- Nathanaël Blanchet Supervision réseau SIRE 227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala 34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5 Tél. 33 (0)4 67 54 84 55 Fax 33 (0)4 67 54 84 14 blanchet(a)abes.fr

2 3

Re: Backup prozess
by marcel d'heureuse 14 Feb '22

14 Feb '22

Sure: https://github.com/vacosta94/VirtBKP Br Marcel Am 14. Februar 2022 20:29:47 MEZ schrieb Jonas Liechti <jonas(a)rabe.ch>: >Would you mind sharing a link to this script? I would be interested in how it works.Am 14.02.2022 19:45 schrieb marcel d'heureuse <marcel(a)deheureu.se>: >> >> Moin, >> >> We have in our Environment 12 servers managed by one self hosted engine. It is ovirt 4.3.9. We are Freizeit on that Version. >> >> How did you make Backups? We use a github Script which generate via api a snapshot and Mount this disk into the vm where the backup Script is running. The backup Script Export this additional Hard disk to a storage and disconnect the disk and remove the snapshot. >> >> This works on Linux vm fine if they have Medium load. If we try this with a Windows 10 vm or Windows Server vm or a Linux vm with high load or with a very big Hard drive this will not work. Disk can't Export and snapshot will not delete. >> >> I have found winchin and bareos but I have not start to check this first I want to have some more possible options. >> >> Thanks >> >> Marcel

1 0

Re: Backup prozess
by Jonas Liechti 14 Feb '22

14 Feb '22

Would you mind sharing a link to this script? I would be interested in how it works.Am 14.02.2022 19:45 schrieb marcel d'heureuse <marcel(a)deheureu.se>: > > Moin, > > We have in our Environment 12 servers managed by one self hosted engine. It is ovirt 4.3.9. We are Freizeit on that Version. > > How did you make Backups? We use a github Script which generate via api a snapshot and Mount this disk into the vm where the backup Script is running. The backup Script Export this additional Hard disk to a storage and disconnect the disk and remove the snapshot. > > This works on Linux vm fine if they have Medium load. If we try this with a Windows 10 vm or Windows Server vm or a Linux vm with high load or with a very big Hard drive this will not work. Disk can't Export and snapshot will not delete. > > I have found winchin and bareos but I have not start to check this first I want to have some more possible options. > > Thanks > > Marcel

1 0

Backup prozess
by marcel d'heureuse 14 Feb '22

14 Feb '22

Moin, We have in our Environment 12 servers managed by one self hosted engine. It is ovirt 4.3.9. We are Freizeit on that Version. How did you make Backups? We use a github Script which generate via api a snapshot and Mount this disk into the vm where the backup Script is running. The backup Script Export this additional Hard disk to a storage and disconnect the disk and remove the snapshot. This works on Linux vm fine if they have Medium load. If we try this with a Windows 10 vm or Windows Server vm or a Linux vm with high load or with a very big Hard drive this will not work. Disk can't Export and snapshot will not delete. I have found winchin and bareos but I have not start to check this first I want to have some more possible options. Thanks Marcel

2 1

Remove obsolete Gluster hyperconverged doc
by Strahil Nikolov 14 Feb '22

14 Feb '22

Hi Sandro, It seems that with https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/commit/f3286b2e1f2871978d054250556f1b4f… all refference to Gluster & Hyperconverged is removed from the website. Can you clarify the situation with Hyperconverged deployments ? Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov

9 12

VDSM KVM2 command SpmStatusVDS failed: Message timeout which can be caused by communication issues
by Chafik Hammami 14 Feb '22

14 Feb '22

Hello, Can you please help us to find a solution for this error VDSM KVM2 command SpmStatusVDS failed: Message timeout which can be caused by communication issues [cid:image001.jpg@01D821CF.F8705D50]

1 0

VDSM KVM2 command SpmStatusVDS failed: Message timeout which can be caused by communication issues
by c.hammami＠nextstep-it.com 14 Feb '22

14 Feb '22

can you please help us. i have 2 KVM with this error VDSM KVM2 command SpmStatusVDS failed: Message timeout which can be caused by communication issues

1 0

Re: oVirt 4.3 - Fibre Channel Data Domain as ISO dump.
by Nir Soffer 14 Feb '22

14 Feb '22

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 4:31 PM Angus Clarke <angus(a)charworth.com> wrote: > > Hello > > RE: oVirt 4.3 - Fibre Channel Data Domain as ISO dump. > > Thanks for letting me join the list. Welcome! > I added a fibre channel Data domain with a view to using it as an ISO dump however I cannot mount CDs to VMs with this error: > > "Error while executing action Change CD: Drive image file could not be found" > > A bit of reading suggests there is no way around this when using fibre channel data domains - is this the case? This works since 4.4.6, but was broken in 4.3. You should upgrade to 4.4 at this point. > I guess I could present the LUN to a VM and run NFS from there as an alternative option. Yes NFS works for ISO on data domain in 4.3. Nir

1 0

oVirt 4.3 - Fibre Channel Data Domain as ISO dump.
by Angus Clarke 14 Feb '22

14 Feb '22

Hello RE: oVirt 4.3 - Fibre Channel Data Domain as ISO dump. Thanks for letting me join the list. I added a fibre channel Data domain with a view to using it as an ISO dump however I cannot mount CDs to VMs with this error: "Error while executing action Change CD: Drive image file could not be found" A bit of reading suggests there is no way around this when using fibre channel data domains - is this the case? I guess I could present the LUN to a VM and run NFS from there as an alternative option. Thanks a lot Angus

1 0

RHGS and RHV closing down: could you please put that on the home page?
by Thomas Hoberg 14 Feb '22

14 Feb '22

I just read this message: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016359 I am shocked but not surprised. And very, very sad. But I believe this decision needs to be communicated more prominently, as people should not get aboard a project already axed.

14 27