It's visible now. I'll try to review it asap. On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Sverker Abrahamsson < sverker@abrahamsson.com> wrote:
Ok, thank you. Done that now /Sverker Den 2017-01-18 kl. 10:14, skrev Fred Rolland:
Go to https://gerrit.ovirt.org/70588 and click on the publish button. Drafts are not visible to everybody. Or you can push to master directly.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Sverker Abrahamsson < sverker@abrahamsson.com> wrote:
I still had the window open where I did that step. This is how it looked like:
[root@h2 ovirt-provider-ovn]# git push origin HEAD:refs/drafts/master Counting objects: 9, done. Delta compression using up to 8 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (5/5), done. Writing objects: 100% (6/6), 1.79 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done. Total 6 (delta 2), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (2/2) remote: Processing changes: new: 1, refs: 1, done remote: (W) 16d5be4: commit subject >65 characters; use shorter first paragraph remote: remote: New Changes: remote: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/70588 Properly handle to set id when interface already has a virtualport element ... [DRAFT] remote: To gerrit.ovirt.org:ovirt-provider-ovn * [new branch] HEAD -> refs/drafts/master
I see the difference is that I pushed to HEAD:refs/drafts/master as instructed at http://www.ovirt.org/develop/d ev-process/working-with-gerrit/
Should I push it to HEAD:refs/for/master instead?
/Sverker Den 2017-01-17 kl. 12:09, skrev Marcin Mirecki:
Sverker, I can see you as a user in gerrit (sverker@abrahamsson.com), but there are no patches for your name. Please check for any errors after you issue: git push gerrit.ovirt.org:ovirt-provider-ovn HEAD:refs/for/master
Also, please let me know if you need any other help on with gerrit.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Sverker Abrahamsson < sverker@abrahamsson.com> wrote:
I've followed the instructions to best effort, so hopefully it's right..
Den 2017-01-13 kl. 10:31, skrev Marcin Mirecki:
Please push the patch into: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/ovirt-provider-ovn (let me know if you need some directions)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sverker Abrahamsson" <sverker@abrahamsson.com> To: "Marcin Mirecki" <mmirecki@redhat.com> Cc: "Ovirt Users" <users@ovirt.org> Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 1:45:37 PM Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Issue with OVN/OVS and mandatory ovirtmgmt network
Ok, found it. The issue is right here:
<interface type="bridge"> <mac address="00:1a:4a:16:01:54" /> <model type="virtio" /> <source bridge="br-int" /> <virtualport type="openvswitch" /> <link state="up" /> <boot order="2" /> <bandwidth /> <virtualport type="openvswitch"> <parameters interfaceid="912cba79-982e-4a87-868e-241fedccb59a" /> </virtualport> </interface>
There are two elements for virtualport, the first without id and the second with. On h2 I had fixed this which was the patch I posted earlier although I switched back to use br-int after understanding that was the correct way. When that hook was copied to h1 the port gets attached fine.
Patch with updated testcase attached.
/Sverker
Den 2017-01-09 kl. 10:41, skrev Sverker Abrahamsson:
This is the content of vdsm.log on h1 at this time:
2017-01-06 20:54:12,636 INFO (jsonrpc/7) [jsonrpc.JsonRpcServer] RPC call VM.create succeeded in 0.01 seconds (__init__:515) 2017-01-06 20:54:12,636 INFO (vm/6dd5291e) [virt.vm] (vmId='6dd5291e-6556-4d29-8b4e-ea896e627645') VM wrapper has started (vm:1901) 2017-01-06 20:54:12,636 INFO (vm/6dd5291e) [vds] prepared volume path: /rhev/data-center/mnt/h2-int.limetransit.com:_var_lib_export s_iso/1d49c4bc-0fec-4503-a583-d476fa3a370d/images/11111111-1 111-1111-1111-111111111111/CentOS-7-x86_64-NetInstall-1611.iso (clientIF:374) 2017-01-06 20:54:12,743 INFO (vm/6dd5291e) [root] (hooks:108) 2017-01-06 20:54:12,847 INFO (vm/6dd5291e) [root] (hooks:108) 2017-01-06 20:54:12,863 INFO (vm/6dd5291e) [virt.vm] (vmId='6dd5291e-6556-4d29-8b4e-ea896e627645') <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <domain xmlns:ovirt="http://ovirt.org/vm/tune/1.0" type="kvm"> <name>CentOS7_3</name> <uuid>6dd5291e-6556-4d29-8b4e-ea896e627645</uuid> <memory>1048576</memory> <currentMemory>1048576</currentMemory> <maxMemory slots="16">4294967296</maxMemory> <vcpu current="1">16</vcpu> <devices> <channel type="unix"> <target name="com.redhat.rhevm.vdsm" type="virtio" /> <source mode="bind" path="/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/channels/6dd5291e-6556-4d29-8b4e -ea896e627645.com.redhat.rhevm.vdsm" /> </channel> <channel type="unix"> <target name="org.qemu.guest_agent.0" type="virtio" /> <source mode="bind" path="/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/channels/6dd5291e-6556-4d29-8b4e -ea896e627645.org.qemu.guest_agent.0" /> </channel> <input bus="ps2" type="mouse" /> <memballoon model="virtio" /> <controller index="0" model="virtio-scsi" type="scsi" /> <controller index="0" ports="16" type="virtio-serial" /> <video> <model heads="1" ram="65536" type="qxl" vgamem="16384" vram="32768" /> </video> <graphics autoport="yes" defaultMode="secure" passwd="*****" passwdValidTo="1970-01-01T00:00:01" port="-1" tlsPort="-1" type="spice"> <channel mode="secure" name="main" /> <channel mode="secure" name="inputs" /> <channel mode="secure" name="cursor" /> <channel mode="secure" name="playback" /> <channel mode="secure" name="record" /> <channel mode="secure" name="display" /> <channel mode="secure" name="smartcard" /> <channel mode="secure" name="usbredir" /> <listen network="vdsm-ovirtmgmt" type="network" /> </graphics> <interface type="bridge"> <mac address="00:1a:4a:16:01:54" /> <model type="virtio" /> <source bridge="br-int" /> <virtualport type="openvswitch" /> <link state="up" /> <boot order="2" /> <bandwidth /> <virtualport type="openvswitch"> <parameters interfaceid="912cba79-982e-4a87-868e-241fedccb59a" /> </virtualport> </interface> <disk device="cdrom" snapshot="no" type="file"> <source file="/rhev/data-center/mnt/h2-int.limetransit.com:_var_lib_ exports_iso/1d49c4bc-0fec-4503-a583-d476fa3a370d/images/1111 1111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111/CentOS-7-x86_64-NetInstall-1611.iso" startupPolicy="optional" /> <target bus="ide" dev="hdc" /> <readonly /> <boot order="1" /> </disk> <channel type="spicevmc"> <target name="com.redhat.spice.0" type="virtio" /> </channel> </devices> <metadata> <ovirt:qos /> </metadata> <os> <type arch="x86_64" machine="pc-i440fx-rhel7.2.0">hvm</type> <smbios mode="sysinfo" /> <bootmenu enable="yes" timeout="10000" /> </os> <sysinfo type="smbios"> <system> <entry name="manufacturer">oVirt</entry> <entry name="product">oVirt Node</entry> <entry name="version">7-3.1611.el7.centos</entry> <entry name="serial">62f1adff-b29e-4a7c-abba-c2c4c73248c6</entry> <entry name="uuid">6dd5291e-6556-4d29-8b4e-ea896e627645</entry> </system> </sysinfo> <clock adjustment="0" offset="variable"> <timer name="rtc" tickpolicy="catchup" /> <timer name="pit" tickpolicy="delay" /> <timer name="hpet" present="no" /> </clock> <features> <acpi /> </features> <cpu match="exact"> <model>SandyBridge</model> <topology cores="1" sockets="16" threads="1" /> <numa> <cell cpus="0" memory="1048576" /> </numa> </cpu> </domain> (vm:1988) 2017-01-06 20:54:13,046 INFO (libvirt/events) [virt.vm] (vmId='6dd5291e-6556-4d29-8b4e-ea896e627645') CPU running: onResume (vm:4863) 2017-01-06 20:54:13,058 INFO (vm/6dd5291e) [virt.vm] (vmId='6dd5291e-6556-4d29-8b4e-ea896e627645') Starting connection (guestagent:245) 2017-01-06 20:54:13,060 INFO (vm/6dd5291e) [virt.vm] (vmId='6dd5291e-6556-4d29-8b4e-ea896e627645') CPU running: domain initialization (vm:4863) 2017-01-06 20:54:15,154 INFO (jsonrpc/6) [jsonrpc.JsonRpcServer] RPC call Host.getVMFullList succeeded in 0.01 seconds (__init__:515) 2017-01-06 20:54:17,571 INFO (periodic/2) [dispatcher] Run and protect: getVolumeSize(sdUUID=u'2ee54fb8-48f2-4576-8cff-f2346504b08b' , spUUID=u'584ebd64-0268-0193-025b-00000000038e', imgUUID=u'5a3aae57-ffe0-4a3b-aa87-8461669db7f9', volUUID=u'b6a88789-fcb1-4d3e-911b-2a4d3b6c69c7', options=None) (logUtils:49) 2017-01-06 20:54:17,573 INFO (periodic/2) [dispatcher] Run and protect: getVolumeSize, Return response: {'truesize': '1859723264', 'apparentsize': '21474836480'} (logUtils:52) 2017-01-06 20:54:21,211 INFO (periodic/2) [dispatcher] Run and protect: repoStats(options=None) (logUtils:49) 2017-01-06 20:54:21,212 INFO (periodic/2) [dispatcher] Run and protect: repoStats, Return response: {u'2ee54fb8-48f2-4576-8cff-f2346504b08b': {'code': 0, 'actual': True, 'version': 3, 'acquired': True, 'delay': '0.000936552', 'lastCheck': '1.4', 'valid': True}, u'1d49c4bc-0fec-4503-a583-d476fa3a370d': {'code': 0, 'actual': True, 'version': 0, 'acquired': True, 'delay': '0.000960248', 'lastCheck': '1.4', 'valid': True}} (logUtils:52) 2017-01-06 20:54:23,543 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [jsonrpc.JsonRpcServer] RPC call Host.getAllVmStats succeeded in 0.00 seconds (__init__:515) 2017-01-06 20:54:23,641 INFO (jsonrpc/1) [jsonrpc.JsonRpcServer] RPC call Host.getAllVmIoTunePolicies succeeded in 0.00 seconds (__init__:515) 2017-01-06 20:54:24,918 INFO (jsonrpc/0) [dispatcher] Run and protect: repoStats(options=None) (logUtils:49) 2017-01-06 20:54:24,918 INFO (jsonrpc/0) [dispatcher] Run and protect: repoStats, Return response: {u'2ee54fb8-48f2-4576-8cff-f2346504b08b': {'code': 0, 'actual': True, 'version': 3, 'acquired': True, 'delay': '0.000936552', 'lastCheck': '5.1', 'valid': True}, u'1d49c4bc-0fec-4503-a583-d476fa3a370d': {'code': 0, 'actual': True, 'version': 0, 'acquired': True, 'delay': '0.000960248', 'lastCheck': '2.1', 'valid': True}} (logUtils:52) 2017-01-06 20:54:24,924 INFO (jsonrpc/0) [jsonrpc.JsonRpcServer] RPC call Host.getStats succeeded in 0.01 seconds (__init__:515)
Vdsm and the OVN driver must have been called as the port IS created, but with the wrong id. I don't find the faulty id in vdsm.log neither, the xml above have the correct id. /Sverker
Den 2017-01-09 kl. 10:06, skrev Marcin Mirecki:
> The port is set up on the host by the ovirt-provider-ovn-driver. > The driver is invoked by the vdsm hook whenever any operation on > the port is done. > Please ensure that this is installed properly. > You can check the vdsm log (/var/log/vdsm/vdsm.log) to see if the > hook was executed properly. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Sverker Abrahamsson" <sverker@abrahamsson.com> >> To: "Marcin Mirecki" <mmirecki@redhat.com> >> Cc: "Ovirt Users" <users@ovirt.org> >> Sent: Friday, January 6, 2017 9:00:26 PM >> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Issue with OVN/OVS and mandatory >> ovirtmgmt network >> >> I created a new VM in the ui and assigned it to host h1. In >> /var/log/ovirt-provider-ovn.log I get the following: >> >> 2017-01-06 20:54:11,940 Request: GET : /v2.0/ports >> 2017-01-06 20:54:11,940 Connecting to remote ovn database: >> tcp:127.0.0.1:6641 >> 2017-01-06 20:54:12,157 Connected (number of retries: 2) >> 2017-01-06 20:54:12,158 Response code: 200 >> 2017-01-06 20:54:12,158 Response body: {"ports": [{"name": >> "4981ee5f-6e15-4bd5-a1cf-7ead9bdd5873", "network_id": >> "e53554cf-e553-40a1-8d22-9c8d95ec0601", "device_owner": "oVirt", >> "mac_address": "00:1a:4a:16:01:51", "id": >> "4981ee5f-6e15-4bd5-a1cf-7ead9bdd5873", "device_id": >> "40cd7328-d575-4c3d-b656-9ef9bacc0078"}, {"name": >> "92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5", "network_id": >> "e53554cf-e553-40a1-8d22-9c8d95ec0601", "device_owner": "oVirt", >> "mac_address": "00:1a:4a:16:01:52", "id": >> "92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5", "device_id": >> "4baefa8c-3822-4de0-9cd0-1d025bab7844"}]} >> 2017-01-06 20:54:12,160 Request: SHOW : >> /v2.0/networks/e53554cf-e553-40a1-8d22-9c8d95ec0601 >> 2017-01-06 20:54:12,160 Connecting to remote ovn database: >> tcp:127.0.0.1:6641 >> 2017-01-06 20:54:12,377 Connected (number of retries: 2) >> 2017-01-06 20:54:12,378 Response code: 200 >> 2017-01-06 20:54:12,378 Response body: {"network": {"id": >> "e53554cf-e553-40a1-8d22-9c8d95ec0601", "name": "ovirtbridge"}} >> 2017-01-06 20:54:12,380 Request: POST : /v2.0/ports >> 2017-01-06 20:54:12,380 Request body: >> { >> "port" : { >> "name" : "nic1", >> "binding:host_id" : "h1.limetransit.com", >> "admin_state_up" : true, >> "device_id" : "e8553a88-05f0-401d-8b9b-5fff77f7bbbe", >> "device_owner" : "oVirt", >> "mac_address" : "00:1a:4a:16:01:54", >> "network_id" : "e53554cf-e553-40a1-8d22-9c8d95ec0601" >> } >> } >> 2017-01-06 20:54:12,380 Connecting to remote ovn database: >> tcp:127.0.0.1:6641 >> 2017-01-06 20:54:12,610 Connected (number of retries: 2) >> 2017-01-06 20:54:12,614 Response code: 200 >> 2017-01-06 20:54:12,614 Response body: {"port": {"name": >> "912cba79-982e-4a87-868e-241fedccb59a", "network_id": >> "e53554cf-e553-40a1-8d22-9c8d95ec0601", "device_owner": "oVirt", >> "mac_address": "00:1a:4a:16:01:54", "id": >> "912cba79-982e-4a87-868e-241fedccb59a", "device_id": >> "e8553a88-05f0-401d-8b9b-5fff77f7bbbe"}} >> >> h1:/var/log/messages >> Jan 6 20:54:12 h1 ovs-vsctl: ovs|00001|vsctl|INFO|Called as >> ovs-vsctl >> --timeout=5 -- --if-exists del-port vnet1 -- add-port br-int vnet1 >> -- >> set Interface vnet1 >> "external-ids:attached-mac=\"00:1a:4a:16:01:54\"" -- >> set Interface vnet1 >> "external-ids:iface-id=\"20388407-0f76-41d8-97aa-8e2b5978f908\"" >> -- set >> Interface vnet1 >> "external-ids:vm-id=\"6dd5291e-6556-4d29-8b4e-ea896e627645\"" -- >> set >> Interface vnet1 external-ids:iface-status=active >> >> [root@h2 ~]# ovn-nbctl show >> switch e53554cf-e553-40a1-8d22-9c8d95ec0601 (ovirtbridge) >> port 4981ee5f-6e15-4bd5-a1cf-7ead9bdd5873 >> addresses: ["00:1a:4a:16:01:51"] >> port 912cba79-982e-4a87-868e-241fedccb59a >> addresses: ["00:1a:4a:16:01:54"] >> port 92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5 >> addresses: ["00:1a:4a:16:01:52"] >> port ovirtbridge-port2 >> addresses: ["unknown"] >> port ovirtbridge-port1 >> addresses: ["unknown"] >> [root@h2 ~]# ovn-sbctl show >> Chassis "6e4dd29f-7607-48d7-8e5a-eef4c6aeefb5" >> hostname: "h2.limetransit.com" >> Encap geneve >> ip: "148.251.126.50" >> options: {csum="true"} >> Port_Binding "4981ee5f-6e15-4bd5-a1cf-7ead9bdd5873" >> Port_Binding "ovirtbridge-port1" >> Chassis "4f10fb04-8fb2-48d7-8a3f-ea6444c02cf9" >> hostname: "h1.limetransit.com" >> Encap geneve >> ip: "144.76.84.73" >> options: {csum="true"} >> Port_Binding "ovirtbridge-port2" >> Port_Binding "92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5" >> >> I.e. same issue >> /Sverker >> >> Den 2017-01-06 kl. 20:49, skrev Sverker Abrahamsson: >> >>> The port is created from Ovirt UI, the ovs-vsctl command below is >>> executed when VM is started. In /var/log/ovirt-provider-ovn.log >>> on h2 >>> I get the following: >>> >>> 2017-01-06 20:19:25,452 Request: GET : /v2.0/ports >>> 2017-01-06 20:19:25,452 Connecting to remote ovn database: >>> tcp:127.0.0.1:6641 >>> 2017-01-06 20:19:25,670 Connected (number of retries: 2) >>> 2017-01-06 20:19:25,670 Response code: 200 >>> 2017-01-06 20:19:25,670 Response body: {"ports": [{"name": >>> "4981ee5f-6e15-4bd5-a1cf-7ead9bdd5873", "network_id": >>> "e53554cf-e553-40a1-8d22-9c8d95ec0601", "device_owner": "oVirt", >>> "mac_address": "00:1a:4a:16:01:51", "id": >>> "4981ee5f-6e15-4bd5-a1cf-7ead9bdd5873", "device_id": >>> "40cd7328-d575-4c3d-b656-9ef9bacc0078"}, {"name": >>> "92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5", "network_id": >>> "e53554cf-e553-40a1-8d22-9c8d95ec0601", "device_owner": "oVirt", >>> "mac_address": "00:1a:4a:16:01:52", "id": >>> "92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5", "device_id": >>> "4baefa8c-3822-4de0-9cd0-1d025bab7844"}]} >>> 2017-01-06 20:19:25,673 Request: PUT : >>> /v2.0/ports/92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5 >>> 2017-01-06 20:19:25,673 Request body: >>> { >>> "port" : { >>> "binding:host_id" : "h1.limetransit.com", >>> "security_groups" : null >>> } >>> } >>> 2017-01-06 20:19:25,673 Connecting to remote ovn database: >>> tcp:127.0.0.1:6641 >>> 2017-01-06 20:19:25,890 Connected (number of retries: 2) >>> 2017-01-06 20:19:25,891 Response code: 200 >>> 2017-01-06 20:19:25,891 Response body: {"port": {"name": >>> "92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5", "network_id": >>> "e53554cf-e553-40a1-8d22-9c8d95ec0601", "device_owner": "oVirt", >>> "mac_address": "00:1a:4a:16:01:52", "id": >>> "92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5", "device_id": >>> "4baefa8c-3822-4de0-9cd0-1d025bab7844"}} >>> >>> In /var/log/messages on h1 I get the following: >>> >>> Jan 6 20:18:56 h1 dbus-daemon: dbus[1339]: [system] Successfully >>> activated service 'org.freedesktop.problems' >>> Jan 6 20:19:26 h1 ovs-vsctl: ovs|00001|vsctl|INFO|Called as >>> ovs-vsctl >>> --timeout=5 -- --if-exists del-port vnet0 -- add-port br-int vnet0 >>> -- >>> set Interface vnet0 "external-ids:attached-mac=\"0 >>> 0:1a:4a:16:01:52\"" >>> -- set Interface vnet0 >>> "external-ids:iface-id=\"72dafda5-03c2-4bb6-bcb6-241fa5c0a1f3\"" >>> -- >>> set Interface vnet0 >>> "external-ids:vm-id=\"4d0c134a-11a0-40f4-b2fb-c13c17c7251c\"" -- >>> set >>> Interface vnet0 external-ids:iface-status=active >>> Jan 6 20:19:26 h1 kernel: device vnet0 entered promiscuous mode >>> Jan 6 20:19:26 h1 avahi-daemon[1391]: Registering new address >>> record >>> for fe80::fc1a:4aff:fe16:152 on vnet0.*. >>> Jan 6 20:19:26 h1 systemd-machined: New machine qemu-4-CentOS72. >>> Jan 6 20:19:26 h1 systemd: Started Virtual Machine >>> qemu-4-CentOS72. >>> Jan 6 20:19:26 h1 systemd: Starting Virtual Machine >>> qemu-4-CentOS72. >>> >>> [root@h2 ~]# ovn-nbctl show >>> switch e53554cf-e553-40a1-8d22-9c8d95ec0601 (ovirtbridge) >>> port 4981ee5f-6e15-4bd5-a1cf-7ead9bdd5873 >>> addresses: ["00:1a:4a:16:01:51"] >>> port 92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5 >>> addresses: ["00:1a:4a:16:01:52"] >>> port ovirtbridge-port2 >>> addresses: ["unknown"] >>> port ovirtbridge-port1 >>> addresses: ["unknown"] >>> [root@h2 ~]# ovn-sbctl show >>> Chassis "6e4dd29f-7607-48d7-8e5a-eef4c6aeefb5" >>> hostname: "h2.limetransit.com" >>> Encap geneve >>> ip: "148.251.126.50" >>> options: {csum="true"} >>> Port_Binding "4981ee5f-6e15-4bd5-a1cf-7ead9bdd5873" >>> Port_Binding "ovirtbridge-port1" >>> Chassis "4f10fb04-8fb2-48d7-8a3f-ea6444c02cf9" >>> hostname: "h1.limetransit.com" >>> Encap geneve >>> ip: "144.76.84.73" >>> options: {csum="true"} >>> Port_Binding "ovirtbridge-port2" >>> >>> I.e. the port is set up with the wrong ID and not attached to OVN. >>> >>> If I correct external-ids:iface-id like this: >>> [root@h1 ~]# ovs-vsctl set Interface vnet0 >>> "external-ids:iface-id=\"92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5\"" >>> >>> then sb is correct: >>> [root@h2 ~]# ovn-sbctl show >>> Chassis "6e4dd29f-7607-48d7-8e5a-eef4c6aeefb5" >>> hostname: "h2.limetransit.com" >>> Encap geneve >>> ip: "148.251.126.50" >>> options: {csum="true"} >>> Port_Binding "4981ee5f-6e15-4bd5-a1cf-7ead9bdd5873" >>> Port_Binding "ovirtbridge-port1" >>> Chassis "4f10fb04-8fb2-48d7-8a3f-ea6444c02cf9" >>> hostname: "h1.limetransit.com" >>> Encap geneve >>> ip: "144.76.84.73" >>> options: {csum="true"} >>> Port_Binding "ovirtbridge-port2" >>> Port_Binding "92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5" >>> >>> I don't know from where the ID 72dafda5-03c2-4bb6-bcb6-241fa5 >>> c0a1f3 >>> comes from, doesn't show in any log other than /var/log/messages. >>> >>> If I do the same exercise on the same host as engine is running on >>> then the port for the VM gets the right id and is working from >>> beginning. >>> /Sverker >>> >>> Den 2017-01-03 kl. 10:23, skrev Marcin Mirecki: >>> >>>> How did you create this port? >>>> From the oVirt engine UI? >>>> The OVN provider creates the port when you add the port in the >>>> engine UI, >>>> it is then plugged into the ovs bridge by the VIF driver. >>>> Please attach /var/log/ovirt-provider-ovn.log >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> >>>>> From: "Sverker Abrahamsson"<sverker@abrahamsson.com> >>>>> To: "Marcin Mirecki"<mmirecki@redhat.com> >>>>> Cc: "Ovirt Users"<users@ovirt.org> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 2:06:22 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Issue with OVN/OVS and mandatory >>>>> ovirtmgmt >>>>> network >>>>> >>>>> Found an issue with Ovirt - OVN integration. >>>>> >>>>> Engine and OVN central db running on host h2. Created VM to run >>>>> on host >>>>> h1, which is started. Ovn db state: >>>>> >>>>> [root@h2 env3]# ovn-nbctl show >>>>> switch e53554cf-e553-40a1-8d22-9c8d95ec0601 >>>>> (ovirtbridge) >>>>> port 4981ee5f-6e15-4bd5-a1cf-7ead9bdd5873 >>>>> addresses: ["00:1a:4a:16:01:51"] >>>>> port 92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5 >>>>> addresses: ["00:1a:4a:16:01:52"] >>>>> port ovirtbridge-port2 >>>>> addresses: ["unknown"] >>>>> port ovirtbridge-port1 >>>>> addresses: ["unknown"] >>>>> [root@h2 env3]# ovn-sbctl show >>>>> Chassis "6e4dd29f-7607-48d7-8e5a-eef4c6aeefb5" >>>>> hostname: "h2.limetransit.com" >>>>> Encap geneve >>>>> ip: "148.251.126.50" >>>>> options: {csum="true"} >>>>> Port_Binding "4981ee5f-6e15-4bd5-a1cf-7ead9bdd5873" >>>>> Port_Binding "ovirtbridge-port1" >>>>> Chassis "4f10fb04-8fb2-48d7-8a3f-ea6444c02cf9" >>>>> hostname: "h1.limetransit.com" >>>>> Encap geneve >>>>> ip: "144.76.84.73" >>>>> options: {csum="true"} >>>>> Port_Binding "ovirtbridge-port2" >>>>> >>>>> Port 92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5 is for the new VM >>>>> which is >>>>> started on h1, but it is not assigned to that chassis. The >>>>> reason is >>>>> that on h1 the port on br-int is created like this: >>>>> >>>>> ovs-vsctl --timeout=5 -- --if-exists del-port vnet0 -- add-port >>>>> br-int >>>>> vnet0 -- set Interface vnet0 >>>>> "external-ids:attached-mac=\"00:1a:4a:16:01:52\"" -- set >>>>> Interface vnet0 >>>>> "external-ids:iface-id=\"35bcbe31-2c7e-4d97-add9-ce150eeb2f11\"" >>>>> -- set >>>>> Interface vnet0 >>>>> "external-ids:vm-id=\"4d0c134a-11a0-40f4-b2fb-c13c17c7251c\"" >>>>> -- set >>>>> Interface vnet0 external-ids:iface-status=active >>>>> >>>>> I.e. the extrernal id of interface is wrong. When I manually >>>>> change to >>>>> the right id like this the port works fine: >>>>> >>>>> ovs-vsctl --timeout=5 -- --if-exists del-port vnet0 -- add-port >>>>> br-int >>>>> vnet0 -- set Interface vnet0 >>>>> "external-ids:attached-mac=\"00:1a:4a:16:01:52\"" -- set >>>>> Interface vnet0 >>>>> "external-ids:iface-id=\"92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5\"" >>>>> -- set >>>>> Interface vnet0 >>>>> "external-ids:vm-id=\"4d0c134a-11a0-40f4-b2fb-c13c17c7251c\"" >>>>> -- set >>>>> Interface vnet0 external-ids:iface-status=active >>>>> >>>>> sb db after correcting the port: >>>>> >>>>> Chassis "6e4dd29f-7607-48d7-8e5a-eef4c6aeefb5" >>>>> hostname: "h2.limetransit.com" >>>>> Encap geneve >>>>> ip: "148.251.126.50" >>>>> options: {csum="true"} >>>>> Port_Binding "4981ee5f-6e15-4bd5-a1cf-7ead9bdd5873" >>>>> Port_Binding "ovirtbridge-port1" >>>>> Chassis "4f10fb04-8fb2-48d7-8a3f-ea6444c02cf9" >>>>> hostname: "h1.limetransit.com" >>>>> Encap geneve >>>>> ip: "144.76.84.73" >>>>> options: {csum="true"} >>>>> Port_Binding "ovirtbridge-port2" >>>>> Port_Binding "92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5" >>>>> >>>>> I don't know from where the faulty id comes from, it's not in any >>>>> logs. >>>>> In the domain xml as printed in vdsm.log the id is correct: >>>>> >>>>> <interface type="bridge"> >>>>> <mac address="00:1a:4a:16:01:52" /> >>>>> <model type="virtio" /> >>>>> <source bridge="br-int" /> >>>>> <virtualport type="openvswitch" /> >>>>> <link state="up" /> >>>>> <boot order="2" /> >>>>> <bandwidth /> >>>>> <virtualport type="openvswitch"> >>>>> <parameters >>>>> interfaceid="92f6d3c8-68b3-4986-9c09-60bee04644b5" /> >>>>> </virtualport> >>>>> </interface> >>>>> >>>>> Where is the ovs-vsctl command line built for this call? >>>>> >>>>> /Sverker >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Den 2017-01-02 kl. 13:40, skrev Sverker Abrahamsson: >>>>> >>>>>> Got it to work now by following the env8 example in OVN >>>>>> tutorial, >>>>>> where a port is added with type l2gateway. Not sure how that is >>>>>> different from the localnet variant, but didn't suceed in >>>>>> getting that >>>>>> one working. Now I'm able to ping and telnet over the tunnel, >>>>>> but not >>>>>> ssh even when the port is answering on telnet. Neither does nfs >>>>>> traffic work even though mount did. Suspecting MTU issue. I did >>>>>> notice >>>>>> that ovn-controller starts too early, before network interfaces >>>>>> are >>>>>> established and hence can't reach the db. As these is a purely >>>>>> OVS/OVN >>>>>> issue I'll ask about it on their mailing list. >>>>>> >>>>>> Getting back to the original issue with Ovirt, I've now added >>>>>> the >>>>>> second host h1 to ovirt-engine. Had to do the same as with h2 to >>>>>> create a dummy ovirtmgmt network but configured access via the >>>>>> public >>>>>> IP. My firewall settings was replaced with iptables config and >>>>>> vdsm.conf was overwritten when engine was set up, so those had >>>>>> to be >>>>>> manually restored. It would be preferable if it would be >>>>>> possible to >>>>>> configure ovirt-engine that it does not "own" the host and >>>>>> instead >>>>>> comply with the settings it has instead of enforcing it's own >>>>>> view.. >>>>>> >>>>>> Apart from that it seems the second host works, although I need >>>>>> to >>>>>> resolve the traffic issue over the OVS tunnel. >>>>>> /Sverker >>>>>> >>>>>> Den 2017-01-02 kl. 01:13, skrev Sverker Abrahamsson: >>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. That is not possible as ovirt (or vdsm) will rewrite the >>>>>>> network >>>>>>> configuration to a non-working state. That is why I've set that >>>>>>> if as >>>>>>> hidden to vdsm and is why I'm keen on getting OVS/OVN to work >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2. I've been reading the doc for OVN and starting to connect >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> dots, which is not trivial as it is complex. Some insights >>>>>>> reached: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> First step is the OVN database, installed by >>>>>>> openvswitch-ovn-central, >>>>>>> which I currently have running on h2 host. The 'ovn-nbctl' and >>>>>>> 'ovn-sbctl' commands are only possible to execute on a database >>>>>>> node. >>>>>>> Two ip's are given to 'vdsm-tool ovn-config <ip to database> >>>>>>> <tunnel >>>>>>> ip>' as arguments, where <ip to database> is how this OVN node >>>>>>> reaches the database and <tunnel ip> is the ip to which other >>>>>>> OVN >>>>>>> nodes sets up a tunnel to this node. I.e. it is not for >>>>>>> creating a >>>>>>> tunnel to the database which I thought first from the >>>>>>> description in >>>>>>> blog post. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The tunnel between OVN nodes is of type geneve which is a UDP >>>>>>> based >>>>>>> protocol but I have not been able to find anywhere which port >>>>>>> is used >>>>>>> so that I can open it in firewalld. I have added OVN on another >>>>>>> host, >>>>>>> called h1, and connected it to the db. I see there is traffic >>>>>>> to the >>>>>>> db port, but I don't see any geneve traffic between the nodes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ovirt is now able to create it's vnet0 interface on the br-int >>>>>>> ovs >>>>>>> bridge, but then I run into the next issue. How do I create a >>>>>>> connection from the logical switch to the physical host? I need >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> to a) get a connection out to the internet through a >>>>>>> masqueraded if >>>>>>> or ipv6 and b) be able to run a dhcp server to give ip's to the >>>>>>> VM's. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /Sverker >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Den 2016-12-30 kl. 18:05, skrev Marcin Mirecki: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1. Why not use your physical nic for ovirtmgmt then? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2. "ovn-nbctl ls-add" does not add a bridge, but a logical >>>>>>>> switch. >>>>>>>> br-int is an internal OVN implementation detail, which >>>>>>>> the user >>>>>>>> should not care about. What you see in the ovirt UI are >>>>>>>> logical >>>>>>>> networks. They are implemented as OVN logical switches >>>>>>>> in case >>>>>>>> of the OVN provider. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please look at: >>>>>>>> http://www.ovirt.org/blog/2016/11/ovirt-provider-ovn/ >>>>>>>> You can get the latest rpms from here: >>>>>>>> http://resources.ovirt.org/repos/ovirt/experimental/master/o >>>>>>>> virt-provider-ovn_fc24_46/rpm/fc24/noarch/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From: "Sverker Abrahamsson"<sverker@abrahamsson.com> >>>>>>>>> To: "Marcin Mirecki"<mmirecki@redhat.com> >>>>>>>>> Cc: "Ovirt Users"<users@ovirt.org> >>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 4:25:58 PM >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Issue with OVN/OVS and mandatory >>>>>>>>> ovirtmgmt network >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1. No, I did not want to put the ovirtmgmt bridge on my >>>>>>>>> physical >>>>>>>>> nic as >>>>>>>>> it always messed up the network config making the host >>>>>>>>> unreachable. I >>>>>>>>> have put a ovs bridge on this nic which I will use to make >>>>>>>>> tunnels >>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>> I add other hosts. Maybe br-int will be used for that >>>>>>>>> instead, will >>>>>>>>> see >>>>>>>>> when I get that far. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As it is now I have a dummy if for ovirtmgmt bridge but this >>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>> probably not work when I add other hosts as that bridge >>>>>>>>> cannot >>>>>>>>> connect >>>>>>>>> to the other hosts. I'm considering keeping this just as a >>>>>>>>> dummy to >>>>>>>>> keep >>>>>>>>> ovirt engine satisfied while the actual communication will >>>>>>>>> happen >>>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>>> OVN/OVS bridges and tunnels. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2. On >>>>>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org//develop/release-management/features/o >>>>>>>>> virt-ovn-provider/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> there is instructions how to add an OVS bridge to OVN with >>>>>>>>> |ovn-nbctl >>>>>>>>> ls-add <network name>|. If you want to use br-int then it >>>>>>>>> makes >>>>>>>>> sense to >>>>>>>>> make that bridge visible in ovirt webui under networks so >>>>>>>>> that it >>>>>>>>> can be >>>>>>>>> selected for VM's. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It quite doesn't make sense to me that I can select other >>>>>>>>> network >>>>>>>>> for my >>>>>>>>> VM but then that setting is not used when setting up the >>>>>>>>> network. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> /Sverker >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Den 2016-12-30 kl. 15:34, skrev Marcin Mirecki: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The OVN provider does not require you to add any bridges >>>>>>>>>> manually. >>>>>>>>>> As I understand we were dealing with two problems: >>>>>>>>>> 1. You only had one physical nic and wanted to put a bridge >>>>>>>>>> on it, >>>>>>>>>> attaching the management network to the bridge. This >>>>>>>>>> was the >>>>>>>>>> reason for >>>>>>>>>> creating the bridge (the recommended setup would be >>>>>>>>>> to used a >>>>>>>>>> separate >>>>>>>>>> physical nic for the management network). This >>>>>>>>>> bridge >>>>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>>> nothing to >>>>>>>>>> do with the OVN bridge. >>>>>>>>>> 2. OVN - you want to use OVN on this system. For this you >>>>>>>>>> have to >>>>>>>>>> install >>>>>>>>>> OVN on your hosts. This should create the br-int >>>>>>>>>> bridge, >>>>>>>>>> which are >>>>>>>>>> then used by the OVN provider. This br-int bridge >>>>>>>>>> must be >>>>>>>>>> configured >>>>>>>>>> to connect to other hosts using the geneve tunnels. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In both cases the systems will not be aware of any bridges >>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>> create. >>>>>>>>>> They need a nic (be it physical or virtual) to connect to >>>>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>>>> system. >>>>>>>>>> Usually this is the physical nic. In your case you decided >>>>>>>>>> to put >>>>>>>>>> a bridge >>>>>>>>>> on the physical nic, and give oVirt a virtual nic attached >>>>>>>>>> to this >>>>>>>>>> bridge. >>>>>>>>>> This works, but keep in mind that the bridge you have >>>>>>>>>> introduced >>>>>>>>>> is outside >>>>>>>>>> of oVirt's (and OVN) control (and as such is not supported). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What is the purpose of >>>>>>>>>>> adding my bridges to Ovirt through the external provider >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> configure >>>>>>>>>>> them on my VM >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am not quite sure I understand. >>>>>>>>>> The external provider (OVN provider to be specific), does >>>>>>>>>> not add >>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>> bridges >>>>>>>>>> to the system. It is using the br-int bridge created by OVN. >>>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>>> networks >>>>>>>>>> created by the OVN provider are purely logical entities, >>>>>>>>>> implemented using >>>>>>>>>> the OVN br-int bridge. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Marcin >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> From: "Sverker Abrahamsson"<sverker@abrahamsson.com> >>>>>>>>>>> To: "Marcin Mirecki"<mmirecki@redhat.com> >>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "Ovirt Users"<users@ovirt.org> >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 12:15:43 PM >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Issue with OVN/OVS and mandatory >>>>>>>>>>> ovirtmgmt >>>>>>>>>>> network >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>> That is the logic I quite don't understand. What is the >>>>>>>>>>> purpose of >>>>>>>>>>> adding my bridges to Ovirt through the external provider >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> configure >>>>>>>>>>> them on my VM if you are disregarding that and using br-int >>>>>>>>>>> anyway? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> /Sverker >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Den 2016-12-30 kl. 10:53, skrev Marcin Mirecki: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sverker, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> br-int is the integration bridge created by default in >>>>>>>>>>>> OVN. This >>>>>>>>>>>> is the >>>>>>>>>>>> bridge we use for the OVN provider. As OVN is required to >>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>> installed, >>>>>>>>>>>> we assume that this bridge is present. >>>>>>>>>>>> Using any other ovs bridge is not supported, and will >>>>>>>>>>>> require >>>>>>>>>>>> custom code >>>>>>>>>>>> changes (such as the ones you created). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The proper setup in your case would probably be to create >>>>>>>>>>>> br-int >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> connect >>>>>>>>>>>> this to your ovirtbridge, although I don't know the >>>>>>>>>>>> details of >>>>>>>>>>>> your env, >>>>>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>>>>> this is just my best guess. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Marcin >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Sverker Abrahamsson"<sverker@abrahamsson.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: "Marcin Mirecki"<mmirecki@redhat.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "Ovirt Users"<users@ovirt.org>, "Numan Siddique" >>>>>>>>>>>>> <nusiddiq@redhat.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 1:14:50 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Issue with OVN/OVS and >>>>>>>>>>>>> mandatory >>>>>>>>>>>>> ovirtmgmt >>>>>>>>>>>>> network >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Even better, if the value is not hardcoded then the >>>>>>>>>>>>> configured >>>>>>>>>>>>> value is >>>>>>>>>>>>> used. Might be that I'm missunderstanding something but >>>>>>>>>>>>> this is >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> behaviour I expected instead of that it is using br-int. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Attached is a patch which properly sets up the xml, in >>>>>>>>>>>>> case >>>>>>>>>>>>> there is >>>>>>>>>>>>> already a virtual port there + testcode of some variants >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> /Sverker >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Den 2016-12-29 kl. 22:55, skrev Sverker Abrahamsson: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> When I change >>>>>>>>>>>>>> /usr/libexec/vdsm/hooks/before >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _device_create/ovirt_provider_ovn_hook >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to instead of hardcoded to br-int use BRIDGE_NAME = >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'ovirtbridge' then >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I get the expected behaviour and I get a working network >>>>>>>>>>>>>> connectivity >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in my VM with IP provided by dhcp. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Sverker >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Den 2016-12-29 kl. 22:07, skrev Sverker Abrahamsson: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By default the vNic profile of my OVN bridge >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ovirtbridge gets a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Network filter named vdsm-no-mac-spoofing. If I instead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No filter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then I don't get those ebtables / iptables messages. It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is some issue between ovirt/vdsm and firewalld, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put to the side for now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is not clear for me why the port is added on br-int >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bridge I've assigned to the VM, which is ovirtbridge?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Sverker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Den 2016-12-29 kl. 14:20, skrev Sverker Abrahamsson: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The specific command most likely fails because there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chain >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named libvirt-J-vnet0, but when should that have been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Sverker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------- Vidarebefordrat meddelande -------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ämne: Re: [ovirt-users] Issue with OVN/OVS and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mandatory >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ovirtmgmt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> network >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Datum: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 08:06:29 -0500 (EST) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Från: Marcin Mirecki<mmirecki@redhat.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till: Sverker Abrahamsson<sverker@abrahamsson.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kopia: Ovirt Users<users@ovirt.org>, Lance >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richardson >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lrichard@redhat.com>, Numan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Siddique<nusiddiq@redhat.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me add the OVN team. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lance, Numan, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please look at this? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trying to plug a vNIC results in: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dec 28 23:31:35 h2 ovs-vsctl: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ovs|00001|vsctl|INFO|Called as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ovs-vsctl >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --timeout=5 -- --if-exists del-port vnet0 -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add-port >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> br-int >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vnet0 -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set Interface vnet0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "external-ids:attached-mac=\"0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0:1a:4a:16:01:51\"" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- set Interface vnet0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "external-ids:iface-id=\"e8853 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aac-8a75-41b0-8010-e630017dcdd8\"" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set Interface vnet0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "external-ids:vm-id=\"b9440d60 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -ef5a-4e2b-83cf-081df7c09e6f\"" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interface vnet0 external-ids:iface-status=acti >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ve >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dec 28 23:31:35 h2 kernel: device vnet0 entered >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> promiscuous >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dec 28 23:31:35 h2 firewalld: WARNING: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> COMMAND_FAILED: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> '/usr/sbin/ebtables --concurrent -t nat -D >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PREROUTING >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -i vnet0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -j >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> libvirt-J-vnet0' failed: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dec 28 23:31:35 h2 firewalld: WARNING: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> COMMAND_FAILED: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More details below >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Sverker Abrahamsson"<sverker@abrahamsson.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: "Marcin Mirecki"<mmirecki@redhat.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "Ovirt Users"<users@ovirt.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 1:42:11 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Issue with OVN/OVS and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mandatory >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ovirtmgmt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> network >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Same problem still.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Sverker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Den 2016-12-29 kl. 13:34, skrev Marcin Mirecki: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The tunnels are created to connect multiple OVN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> controllers. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there is only one, there is no need for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tunnels, so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> none >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be created, this is the correct behavior. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does the problem still occur after setting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuring the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OVN-controller? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marcin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Sverker Abrahamsson"<sverker@abrahamss >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: "Marcin Mirecki"<mmirecki@redhat.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "Ovirt Users"<users@ovirt.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 11:44:32 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Iss >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
[Message clipped] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users