Hi, I'm currently writing a little howto for people who use debian based systems so they can benefit from ovirt-shell. after installing all dependencies easy_install ovirt-shell seemed to work. However I got one error which I'd like to get fixed: Building against libxml2/libxslt in the following directory: /usr/lib /usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py:267: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'bugtrack_url' warnings.warn(msg) Adding lxml 3.3.4 to easy-install.pth file Maybe someone could assist me with that?

In general it would be cool especially for development tools like sdks and the cli if they are available prepackaged not just for RHEL derivatives as it would pretty much speed up the distribution of oVirt itself and attract more devs if they can use their environment without needing to setup fedora/centos. I'll therefore try to forge a deb package in my very little spare time. any help would be appreciated.

On 04/15/2014 11:03 AM, Juan Hernandez wrote: > On 04/15/2014 03:40 PM, Sven Kieske wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm currently writing a little >> howto for people who use >> debian based systems so they >> can benefit from ovirt-shell. >> >> after installing all dependencies >> easy_install ovirt-shell >> seemed to work. >> However I got one error >> which I'd like to get fixed: >> >> Building against libxml2/libxslt in the following directory: /usr/lib >> /usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py:267: UserWarning: Unknown >> distribution option: 'bugtrack_url' >> warnings.warn(msg) >> Adding lxml 3.3.4 to easy-install.pth file >> >> >> Maybe someone could assist me with that? >> > > This looks like a problem in lxml itself, not in ovirt-shell. That > "bugtrack_url" option isn't supported by the Python setup tools, only by > PyPI, but the setup.py file in lxml 3.3.4 does contain it. Anyhow it is > just a warning, it shouldn't cause any real problem. I'd suggest to > install the python-lxml package instead of letting easy_install install > it, this should eliminate that warning. > >> In general it would be cool especially >> for development tools like sdks and the cli >> if they are available prepackaged not just >> for RHEL derivatives as it would pretty >> much speed up the distribution of oVirt >> itself and attract more devs if they >> can use their environment without >> needing to setup fedora/centos. >> >> I'll therefore try to forge a deb package >> in my very little spare time. >> any help would be appreciated. >> > > I completely agree, let me know how I can help. > Sven - was this resolved?