Error Java SDK Issue??
by Geschwentner, Patrick
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen!
I am currently working with the java-sdk and I encountered a problem.
If I would like to retrieve the disk details, I get the following error:
Disk currDisk = ovirtConnection.followLink(diskAttachment.disk());
The Error is occurring in this line:
[cid:image001.png@01D44537.AF127FD0]
The getResponst looks quiet ok. (I inspected: [cid:image002.png@01D44537.AF127FD0] and it looks ok).
Error:
wrong number of arguments
The code is quiet similar to what you published on github (https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-engine-sdk-java/blob/master/sdk/src/test/j... ).
Can you confirm the defect?
Best regards
Patrick
2 years, 8 months
OST's basic suite UI sanity tests optimization
by Marcin Sobczyk
Hi,
_TL; DR_ Let's cut the running time of '008_basic_ui_sanity.py' by more
than 3 minutes by sacrificing Firefox and Chrome screenshots in favor of
Chromium.
During the OST hackathon in Brno this year, I saw an opportunity to
optimize basic UI sanity tests from basic suite.
The way we currently run them, is by setting up a Selenium grid using 3
docker containers, with a dedicated network... that's insanity! (pun
intended).
Let's a look at the running time of '008_basic_ui_sanity.py' scenario
(https://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/oVirt%20system%20tests/job/ovirt-system-te...):
01:31:50 @ Run test: 008_basic_ui_sanity.py:
01:31:50 nose.config: INFO: Ignoring files matching ['^\\.', '^_',
'^setup\\.py$']
01:31:50 # init:
01:31:50 # init: Success (in 0:00:00)
01:31:50 # start_grid:
01:34:05 # start_grid: Success (in 0:02:15)
01:34:05 # initialize_chrome:
01:34:18 # initialize_chrome: Success (in 0:00:13)
01:34:18 # login:
01:34:27 # login: Success (in 0:00:08)
01:34:27 # left_nav:
01:34:45 # left_nav: Success (in 0:00:18)
01:34:45 # close_driver:
01:34:46 # close_driver: Success (in 0:00:00)
01:34:46 # initialize_firefox:
01:35:02 # initialize_firefox: Success (in 0:00:16)
01:35:02 # login:
01:35:11 # login: Success (in 0:00:08)
01:35:11 # left_nav:
01:35:29 # left_nav: Success (in 0:00:18)
01:35:29 # cleanup:
01:35:36 # cleanup: Success (in 0:00:06)
01:35:36 # Results located at
/dev/shm/ost/deployment-basic-suite-master/008_basic_ui_sanity.py.junit.xml
01:35:36 @ Run test: 008_basic_ui_sanity.py: Success (in 0:03:45)
Starting the Selenium grid takes 2:15 out of 3:35 of total running time!
I've investigated a lot of approaches and came up with something like this:
* install 'chromium-headless' package on engine VM
* download 'chromedriver' and 'selenium hub' jar and deploy them in
'/var/opt/' on engine's VM
* run 'selenium.jar' on engine VM from '008_basic_ui_sanity.py' by
using Lago's ssh
* connect to the Selenium instance running on the engine in
'008_basic_ui_sanity.py'
* make screenshots
This series of patches represent the changes:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/topic:selenium-on-engine+(status:open+OR+sta....
This is the new running time (https://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/oVirt
system tests/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/4195/):
20:13:26 @ Run test: 008_basic_ui_sanity.py:
20:13:26 nose.config: INFO: Ignoring files matching ['^\\.', '^_',
'^setup\\.py$']
20:13:26 # init:
20:13:26 # init: Success (in 0:00:00)
20:13:26 # make_screenshots:
20:13:27 * Retrying (Retry(total=2, connect=None, read=None,
redirect=None, status=None)) after connection broken by
'NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection object at
0x7fdb6004f8d0>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111]
Connection refused',)': /wd/hub
20:13:27 * Retrying (Retry(total=1, connect=None, read=None,
redirect=None, status=None)) after connection broken by
'NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection object at
0x7fdb6004fa10>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111]
Connection refused',)': /wd/hub
20:13:27 * Retrying (Retry(total=0, connect=None, read=None,
redirect=None, status=None)) after connection broken by
'NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection object at
0x7fdb6004fb50>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111]
Connection refused',)': /wd/hub
20:13:28 * Redirecting http://192.168.201.4:4444/wd/hub ->
http://192.168.201.4:4444/wd/hub/static/resource/hub.html
20:14:02 # make_screenshots: Success (in 0:00:35)
20:14:02 # Results located at
/dev/shm/ost/deployment-basic-suite-master/008_basic_ui_sanity.py.junit.xml
20:14:02 @ Run test: 008_basic_ui_sanity.py: Success (in 0:00:35)
(The 'NewConnectionErrors' is waiting for Selenium hub to be up and
running, I can silence these later).
And the screenshots are here:
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/oVirt%20system%20tests/job/ovirt-system-te...
_The pros:_
* we cut the running time by more than 3 minutes
_The cons:_
* we don't get Firefox or Chrome screenshots - we get Chromium
screenshots (although AFAIK, QE has much more Selenium tests which
cover both Firefox and Chrome)
* we polute the engine VM with 'chromium-headless' package and deps
(in total: 'chromium-headless', 'chromium-common', 'flac-libs' and
'minizip'), although we can remove these after the tests
_Some design choices explained:_
Q: Why engine VM?
A: Because the engine VM already has 'X11' libs. We could install
'chromium-headless' (and even other browsers) on our Jenkins executors,
but that would mess them up a lot.
Q: Why Chromium?
A: Because it has a separate 'headless' package.
Q: Why not use 'chromedriver' RPM in favor of
https://chromedriver.storage.googleapis.com Chromedriver builds?
A: Because the RPM version pulls a lot of extra dependencies even on the
engine VM ('gtk3', 'cairo' etc.). Builds from the URL are the offical
Google Chromedriver builds, they contain a single binary, and they work
for us.
_What still needs to be polished with the patches:_
* Currently 'setup_engine_selenium.sh' script downloads each time
'selenium.jar' and 'chromedriver.zip' (even with these downloads we
get much faster set-up times) - we should bake these into the engine
VM image template.
* 'selenium_hub_running' function in 'selenium_on_engine.py' is
hackish - an ability to run an ssh command with a context manager
(and auto-terminate on it exits) should be part of Lago. Can be
refactored.
Questions, comments, reviews are welcome.
Regards, Marcin
4 years, 4 months
Fedora 29 support?
by Nir Soffer
Fedora 28 will be EOL in few month, and at this point people are migration
to Fedora 29.
I tried yesterday to build engine development setup on Fedora 29 VM, and
found that it does
not work:
- some packages are missing on engine side
- after hacking the ovirt.repo files, pointing to "28" instead of
"$releasever", I got the packages...
- but then adding a host fail with "Python is missing" on the host, which
is working Fedora 28 host
used with engine before.
What are our plans for supporting Fedora 29 on engine and host?
I hope that the work we did for Fedora 28 will make it easier to port to
Fedora 29.
Nir
4 years, 7 months
Some feedback of an upgrade from 4.2 to 4.3 (EPYC Cluster)
by Tobias Scheinert
Hi,
1) Thank you all for the official support of the AMD EPYC processors in
version 4.3! :-)
2) During the upgrade process I removed the old guest ISO file and
replaced it with the new one (different filename of course). As I moved
a virtual machine with the old ISO file mounted, the vm crashed.
"Migration failed: Lost connection with qemu process (VM: <vmname>,
Source: <ovirt-node-host>)."
Yes I know this is not real bug (dumb user), but maybe it is good
preventing the users for doing something stupid ;-)
3) The log contains following messages after upgrading the node:
"VDSM <ovirt-node-host> command Get Host Statistics failed: Internal
JSON-RPC error: {'reason': '[Errno 19] genev_sys_6081 is not present in
the system'}"
This stops after some time ~20-30 minutes, but comes back after a
restart of a node. And disappears again after some time. At the moment
we have no problems and not taking this as a real issue.
4) If we are running Windows 10 guests newer than build version 1709,
the vm crashes on our EPYC cluster, on the SandyBridge cluster the issue
doesn't exists. The reason is the wrong CPU model of QEMU, see:
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593190>
We fixed this problem with a line in "/etc/modprobe.d/kvm.conf"
"options kvm ignore_msrs=1".
Thank you all for this great piece of software :-)
Regard Tobias
4 years, 7 months
Nominating Miguel Barosso as ovirt-provider-ovn maintainer
by Marcin Mirecki
I would like to propose Miguel Barosso as a maintainer for
ovirt-provider-ovn.
Miguel is now working on the project for almost a year, and for the last
few month is practically the only active contributor to the project.
He has successfully implemented new features right up from the design
stage, added a new integration test framework, fixed an endless amount of
bugs and contributed over 200 patches to the project.
Currently the only maintainer (me) is no longer actively working on the
project, which is a cause of a review bottleneck.
Thanks,
Marcin
4 years, 7 months
