Please send mails to the list next time.
can you please do rpm -qa |grep qemu.
also, can you try a different windows image?
On 07/14/2014 02:03 PM, lucas castro wrote:
> On the host there I've tried to run the vm, I use a centOS 6.5
> and checked, no update for qemu, libvirt or related package.
Upcoming in 3.6 is enhancement for managing the hosted engine VM.
In short, we want to:
* Allow editing the Hosted engine VM, storage domain, disks, networks etc
* Have a shared configuration for the hosted engine VM
* Have a backup for the hosted engine VM configuration
please review and comment on the wiki below:
OK thanks! I saw that after upgrading to 4.0.5 from 4.0.4 the DB
already dropped with around 500MB directly and is now at 2GB smaller.
Does this sounds familiar to you with other settings in 4.0.5 ?
2017-01-08 10:45 GMT+01:00 Shirly Radco <sradco(a)redhat.com>:
> No. That will corrupt your database.
> Are you using the full dwh or the smaller version for the dashboards?
> Please set the delete thresholds to save less data and the data older then
> the time you set will be deleted.
> Add a file to /ovirt-engine-dwhd.conf.d/
> Add these lines with the new configurations. The numbers represent the hours
> to keep the data.
> These are the configurations for a full dwh.
> The smaller version configurations are:
> The delete process by default at 3am every day (DWH_DELETE_JOB_HOUR=3)
> Best regards,
> Shirly Radco
> BI Software Engineer
> Red Hat Israel Ltd.
> 34 Jerusalem Road
> Building A, 4th floor
> Ra'anana, Israel 4350109
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Matt . <yamakasi.014(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> I seem to have some large database for the DWH logging and I wonder
>> how I can empty it safely.
>> Can I just simply empty the database ?
>> Have a good weekend!
>> Users mailing list
vdsClient will be removed from master branch today.
It is using XMLRPC protocol which has been deprecated and replaced by
A new client for vdsm was introduced in 4.1: vdsm-client.
This is a simple client that uses JSON-RPC protocol which was introduced in
The client is not aware of the available methods and parameters, and you
the schema  in order to construct the desired command.
Future version should parse the schema and provide online help.
If you're using vdsClient, we will be happy to assist you in migrating to
the new vdsm client.
vdsm-client [-h] [-a ADDRESS] [-p PORT] [--unsecure] [--timeout TIMEOUT]
[-f FILE] namespace method [name=value [name=value] ...]
Invoking simple methods:
# vdsm-client Host getVMList
For invoking methods with many or complex parameters, you can read
the parameters from a JSON format file:
# vdsm-client Lease info -f lease.json
where lease.json file content is:
It is also possible to read parameters from standard input, creating
complex parameters interactively:
# cat <<EOF | vdsm-client Lease info -f -
*Constructing a command from vdsm schema:*
Let's take VM.getStats as an example.
This is the entry in the schema:
description: Get statistics about a running virtual machine.
- description: The UUID of the VM
description: An array containing a single VmStats record
method name: getStats
The vdsm-client command is:
# vdsm-client VM getStats vmID=b3f6fa00-b315-4ad4-8108-f73da817b5c5
*Invoking getVdsCaps command:*
# vdsm-client Host getCapabilities
Please consult vdsm-client help and man page for further details and
Red Hat Israel Ltd.
Is it possible to pass multiple VLANs to a VM (pfSense) using a single
virtual NIC? All my existing oVirt networks are setup as a single tagged
VLAN. I know this didn't used to be supported but wondered if this has
changed. My other option is to pass each VLAN as a separate NIC to the VM
however if I needed to add a new VLAN I would have to add a new interface
and reboot the VM as hot-add of NICs is not supported by pfSense.
I have one cluster with two hosts with power management correctly
configured and one virtual machine with HostedEngine over shared
storage with FiberChannel.
When i shutdown the network of host with HostedEngine VM, it should be
possible the HostedEngine VM migrate automatically to another host?
What is the expected behaviour on this HA scenario?
Engenheiro de Software Sénior
Eurotux Informática, S.A. | www.eurotux.com
(t) +351 253 680 300 (m) +351 911 926 110
Hi All - Is that a way to mark hosted_storage somehow so that it’s not available to add new VMs to? Right now it’s the default storage domain when adding a VM. At the least, I’d like to make another storage domain the default.
Is there a way to do this?
Just wondering if we have an updated manual or whats the current
procedure for upgrading the nodes in a hyperconverged ovirt gluster pool?
Ie Nodes run 4.0 oVirt, as well as GlusterFS, and hosted-engine running
in a gluster storage domain.
Put node in maintenance mode and disable glusterfs from ovirt gui, run