March 2022 - Users - oVirt List Archives

Invitation: oVirt 4.5.0 Beta release test day @ Thu Mar 31, 2022 (users@ovirt.org)
by sbonazzo＠redhat.com 21 Mar '22

21 Mar '22

You have been invited to the following event. Title: oVirt 4.5.0 Beta release test day If you're willing to help testing the release during the test daysplease join the oVirt development mailing list athttps://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/ and report yourfeedback there.Instructions for installing oVirt 4.5.0 Beta fortesting have been added to the release pagehttps://www.ovirt.org/release/4.5.0/  When: Thu Mar 31, 2022 Calendar: users(a)ovirt.org Who: (Guest list has been hidden at organizer's request) Event details: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=MXZpZGdobjViaHQz… Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this courtesy email at the account users(a)ovirt.org because you are an attendee of this event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Alternatively you can sign up for a Google account at https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ and control your notification settings for your entire calendar. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer and be added to the guest list, or invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or to modify your RSVP. Learn more at https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 0

Enroll engine certificate
by Mikhail Po 21 Mar '22

21 Mar '22

When we perform point 6 of section "Replacing All Signed Certificates with SHA-256" https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.4/ht… an error occurs: Ignoring -days; not generating a certificate Using configuration from openssl.conf Check that the request matches the signature Signature ok name is expected to be in the format /type0=value0/type1=value1/type2=... where characters may be escaped by \. This name is not in that format: 'subject=C = US, O = domain.com, CN = ovirt01.domain.com' Cannot sign certificate Cannot sign request ...

2 1

The connection between the Engine and the hosts has been broken
by porsevm＠gmail.com 20 Mar '22

20 Mar '22

The connection between the Engine and the hosts has been broken. On the Engine side, all hosts are in the "NonResponsive" state, and on the hosts "ERROR ssl handshake". oVirt 4.4.4.7-1.el8

4 5

all hosts lost scenario - restore engine from backup file - LOCKED HOST 4.3 version
by goosesk blabla 20 Mar '22

20 Mar '22

Hi, I have problem with LOCKED host after restore of engine. i am trying many disaster scenarios and one from them is loosing of all hosts with self hosted engine included with backup file of engine only. When all hosts and engine VM were destroyed at the same time, i installed new self hosted engine on hardware from one lost host. Then tried restore engine engine-backup --mode=restore --scope=all --file=backup/file/ovirt-engine-backup --log=backup/log/ovirt-engine-backup.log --no-restore-permissions --provision-db --provision-dwh-db –provision-reports-db After this, lost engine was restored successfully. I had offline Datacentrer, dead hosts and VM. I added new hosts, which were able to connect to domain storage automatically and I was able to start VM. New host cannot has the same IP as already dead host or hardware UID. This can be solved by setup old dead host to maintenance mode and then delete host. Then the same hardware and IP can be reused. But, host where old engine was running is LOCKED. You cannot migrate engine VM, cannot start hosted engine from new engine GUI, cannot setup host to maintenance mode and delete.. This is problem when your hardware for hosts is limited. I would like to ask how to solve this situation, Is there any way how to “reinstall” old hosts? I see that SSL certificates were changed with new installation of new hosts, but I don’t know if there is way how to enable old dead hosts. Is there any way how to destroy old engine VM to add host back to work ? Thank you

2 1

Hosted engine deployment fails with storage domaine error
by Eugène Ngontang 19 Mar '22

19 Mar '22

Hi, Hope you are well on your end. I'm still trying to setup a brand new hosted engine but I'm having "Hosted engine deployment fails with storage domaine error" issue, like shown in the screenshot. I can't figure out what's going on, I have checked the NFS server and everything seems to be working fine, as well as the nfs mount point on the client side (RHV host). Please can one here help moving fast with this troubleshooting? Any idea? Regards, Eugène NG -- LesCDN <http://lescdn.com> engontang(a)lescdn.com ------------------------------------------------------------ *Aux hommes il faut un chef, et au* * chef il faut des hommes!L'habit ne fait pas le moine, mais lorsqu'on te voit on te juge!*

2 14

Re: mdadm vs. JBOD
by jonas＠rabe.ch 19 Mar '22

19 Mar '22

Thanks to Nikolov and Strahil for the valuable input! I was off for a few weeks, so I would like to apologize if I'm potentially reviving a zombie thread. I am a bit confused about where to go with this environment after the discontinuation of the hyperconverged setup. What alternative options are there for us? Or do you think going the Gluster way would still be advisable, even though it seems as it is being discontinued over time? Thanks for any input on this! Best regards, Jonas On 1/22/22 14:31, Strahil Nikolov via Users wrote: > Using the wizzard is utilizing the Gluster Andible roles. > I would highly recommend using it, unless you know what you are doing (for example storage alignment when using Hardware raid). > > Keep in mind that the DHT xlator (the logic in distributed volumes) is shard aware, so your shards are spread between subvolumes and additional performance can be gained.So using replicated-distributed volumes have their benefits. > > If you decide to avoid the software raid, use only replica3 volumes as with SSDs/NVMEs usually the failures are not physical, but logical (maximum writes reached -> predictive failure -> total failure). > > Also, consider mounting via noatime/relatime and context="system_u:object_r:glusterd_brick_t:s0" for your gluster bricks. > > Best Regards, > Strahil Nikolov > > > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:00, Gilboa Davara > > <gilboad(a)gmail.com> mailto:gilboad@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org mailto:users@ovirt.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org mailto:users-leave@ovirt.org > > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html > > oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > > List Archives: > > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/U2ZEWLRF5D6FE… > > > > >

4 4

querying which LUNs are associated to a specific VM disks
by Sandro Bonazzola 18 Mar '22

18 Mar '22

I got a question on oVirt Itala Telegram group about how to get which LUNs are used by the disks attached to a specific VMs. This information doesn't seem to be exposed in API or within the engine DB. Has anybody ever tried something like this? Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/> *Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours.*

3 2

Reported Devices - Shows all interfaces
by Jean-Louis Dupond 18 Mar '22

18 Mar '22

Hi, To find out which guest nic is mapped to which ovirt nic you can do the following API call: /ovirt-engine/api/vms/4c1d50b2-4eee-46d6-a1b1-e4d9e21edaa6/nics/76ff8008-ae2e-46da-aaf4-8cc589dd0c12/reporteddevices But I would expect the reporteddevices to only show the one from the specified NIC, but it's not the case as all of them are displayed. Is this a bug? Or was this done by design? Thanks Jean-Louis

1 0

OVIRT INSTALLATION IN SAS RAID
by muhammad.riyaz＠ajex.ae 18 Mar '22

18 Mar '22

I have a Dell PowerEdge 710 server with SAS RAID 1 PERC 6/i, I am trying to install ovirt 4.4 but I could not find the destination disk. in the destination disk page, it is only showing my USB bootable device only. probably this might be SAS RAID diver error, if so how can i load driver during the installation.

5 18

So - no updates nor mentions about CVE-2022-0847 (Dirty Pipe)?
by jasonmicron＠gmail.com 18 Mar '22

18 Mar '22

Sorry if I missed this, but oVirt Engine is impacted. I was hoping to see some sort of release or announcement about this. If there was one, apologies. RHV has mitigated this: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0841

2 2