Hi Sandro
Thanks for sharing, probably the stand out question to the uninitiated would be; why not
integrate oVirt as OpenShift's virtualization stack?
Thanks
Angus
________________________________
From: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2022, 8:31 am
To: Nathanaël Blanchet
Cc: users
Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: oVirt alternatives
Il giorno dom 20 feb 2022 alle ore 22:47 Nathanaël Blanchet
<blanchet@abes.fr<mailto:blanchet@abes.fr>> ha scritto:
Hello, Is okd/openshift virtualization designed to be a full replacement of ovirt/redhat
by embedding the same level of advanced
oVirt is a very mature project, integrated with most of the Red Hat ecosystem, mostly
being maintained without any new big features.
It has live-snapshot, live-storage-migration, memory overcommit management, passthrough of
a very specific PCI device on a particular host, a VM portal, OpenShift IPI.
It lacks integrated container management.
OKD Virtualization is being very actively developed quickly closing gaps.
It has integrated container management, ability to leverage the k8s distributed
architecture/infrastructure and to leverage k8s assets like exclusive CPU placements.
It currently lacks live-snapshot, live-storage-migration, memory overcommit management,
passthrough of a very specific PCI device on a particular host, VM portal (OKD UI is more
similar to Admin portal), thin-provisioning (of VMs on top of templates), hot (un)plug
(disk/memory/NIC), high availability with VM leases, incremental backup, VDI features like
template versions, sealing (virt-sysprep).
So OKD is not feature complete replacement for oVirt yet.
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat
EMEA<https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%...
sbonazzo@redhat.com<mailto:sbonazzo@redhat.com>
[
https://static.redhat.com/libs/redhat/brand-assets/2/corp/logo--200.png]&...
Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email
out of your office hours.