On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul(a)redhat.com> wrote:
is a graph that shows gwt-rpc performing slightly better than de-rpc.
> Memory consumption is about the same -- gwt-rpc is just a faster rpc
> implementation.
>
I'm wondering if we have any data about de-rpc vs. gwt-rpc under WAN
conditions. With latency (say, 70ms, based on [1]) and possibly some packet
loss (0.5% should suffice).
Y.
[1]
http://www.internettrafficreport.com/30day.htm
We did WAN testing for the memory leaks, but not for the rpc change. (The
ask got misinterpreted by me -- my bad.)
I'll get you some results for this this week.
Greg