1. Why do we need a new set of permissions for "Create
Instance" and "Instance Owner"? Aren't the VmCreator role and the
UserVmManager role enough in these use-cases?
ccing Andrew, he might know best
2. iiuc, the internal implementation of instance types and images
will be done using templates.
correct
However, I guess we plan to expose instance types and images as REST
resources, right?
yes, however the REST will be discussed more deeply once there
will be an agreement on FE and BE.
Tomas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Oved Ourfalli" <ovedo(a)redhat.com>
To: "Tomas Jelinek" <tjelinek(a)redhat.com>
Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:54:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Instance Types Feature
Some questions:
1. Why do we need a new set of permissions for "Create Instance" and
"Instance Owner"? Aren't the VmCreator role and the UserVmManager role
enough in these use-cases?
2. iiuc, the internal implementation of instance types and images will be done using
templates. However, I guess we plan to expose instance types and images as REST resources,
right?
Thank you,
Oved
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomas Jelinek" <tjelinek(a)redhat.com>
To: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 3:09:51 PM
Subject: [Engine-devel] Instance Types Feature
Hi All,
this is the proposed new feature called instance types:
http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Instance_Types
Long story short - it should basically split the VM template into:
- "hardware profile" called instance types
- "software profile" called image
This should enable to do something like: Create a new "small" VM and
attach a disk with "RHEL + Postgres" installed.
Any comments are more than welcome!
Tomas
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel